The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The major similarities and differences between the idea of "Kingship" in England, France, and Iberia were the following.
The similarities between the three were that these kingdoms ambitioned too much power and control by exploring, conquering, and colonizing new colonies that could get their respective kings more richness.
These kingdoms sent explorers to navigate and discover new routes and places to conquer. That is how, for instance, Christopher Columbus was sponsored by the King of Spain Ferdinand de Aragon and Queen Isabelle del Castille, to sail and discover the Americans on October 12, 1492.
These monarchies were violent and tried to conquer and took possession of territories no matter what.
The main difference between these three monarchies was the approach they had when conquering and colonizing new territories.
The kingdom of Spain conquered native tribes in Mesoamerica, the Caribbean, and South America, but did not destroy the native Indians. The Spaniards conquered great empires of the time such as the Great Aztec Empire or the Inca Empire, but they sent Catholic missioners to evangelize the Indians into the Catholic church principles. The Indians under Spanish rule were servants.
In the case of the English, the first colony that was founded was Jamestown, Virginia, in 1607, in the North American territory. The white English colonists were very interested in settle the land to exploit the many raw materials and natural resources. To do that they had to fight and remove the Native American Indians that already lived there. The whites are were only interested in work the land to be rich.
In the case of France, the French were not really interested in settle the land or took it away from the Native Indians. The French were interested in getting rich through the fur trade to sell the beautiful and expensive animal fur in the European markets. That is why the French had a much better relationship with the Native American Indian tribes.
If you compared a 1914 map of Europe and a 1919 map of Europe, which statement would be true?
The Caribbean Sea was now connected to the Pacific Ocean
There were more countries in Europe after WWI
There were more countries in Europe before WWI
Answer:
There were more countries in Europe after WWI
Explanation:
The former empire of Austria-Hungary was dissolved, and new nations were created from its land: Austria, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and Yugoslavia.
Also to mention the nine new nations that were created by the treaty of Versailles?(rementioned few but here) Austria, Yugoslavia, Lithuania, Latvia, Czechoslovakia, Estonia, Poland, Hungary, and Finland. (Ottoman Empire changed its name to Turkey.
Could people colonize places nowadays?
Answer: It is very unlikely to colonize nowadays because now we have better forces and protection.
Define art and culture.
Culture - A group of people that share attitudes, goals values etc.
Art - A product done by people, something that shows an idea, or an emotion or, experiences.
Answer:
Culture – set of shared attitudes, values, goals, and practices that define a group of people, such as the people of a particular region. ... The arts – vast subdivision of culture, composed of many creative endeavors and disciplines. The arts encompasses visual arts, literary arts and the performing arts.
How did the Maori survive in New Zealand? Select all correct options.
fishing
farming
mining
banking
Why are the Californios still important today?
Answer: Because they are the Californios
Explanation:
Who is the petition written for?
Help, please
A government ruled by one, or a few, _____ God is seen as the ultimate leader, the leader on earth is a “stand-in ” for him
possible answers
religious
citizens
People
Answer:
Religious
Explanation:
People god doesn't make sense, and the Citizens may worship their leader, but religion makes more sense in general. I think that given the context of "leader on Earth standing in", you can piece together that it is a religious figure.
Answer:
religious
Explanation:
Which of the following was the first action taken by the federal government to
protect the environment?
A. Establishing a national park system
B. Limiting the amount of waste dumped in the nation's waterways
C. Creating a new agency to oversee polluting industries
D. Setting limits on the emission of greenhouse gases
Answer:
C - Creating a new agency to oversee polluting industries
Explanation:
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the first major U.S. environmental law. Enacted in 1969 and signed into law in 1970 by President Richard M. Nixon, NEPA requires all federal agencies to go through a formal process before taking any action anticipated to have a substantial impact on the environment.
Establishing a national park system is considered to be the first major action taken by the federal government to protect the environment. Hence option A is correct .
In 1872, President Ulysses S. Grant signed a bill that established Yellowstone National Park as the first national park in the world. This marked a significant turning point in American history as it demonstrated the country's commitment to preserving its natural wonders for future generations.
The establishment of the national park system was a response to the increasing exploitation of natural resources and the destruction of wildlife habitats in the late 19th century. It signaled a shift in public attitudes towards the environment, which until then had been viewed as a resource to be exploited for economic gain.
Since then, the federal government has taken many other actions to protect the environment, including the creation of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1970 to oversee environmental regulations, the passage of the Clean Water Act in 1972 to limit pollution in the nation's waterways, and the establishment of regulations to limit greenhouse gas emissions from various industries in recent years.
However, the establishment of the national park system remains a significant milestone in the history of environmental protection in the United States .
Learn more about Federal government here
https://brainly.com/question/17131004
#SPJ7
whats a good example of the 3rd amendment
Answer:
the third amendment has to do with the quartering of soldiers so a good example would be that during peacetime soldiers demand to stay in your house by order of the government but you decline because of your rights listed in the third amendment which state that the government can't force you to house soldiers during peacetime.
Answer:
The 3rd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution concerns the housing of soldiers during wartime. A example, the 3rd Amendment forbids soldiers from taking up any residence space in citizens' houses or buildings during peace time, unless they have the consent from the building/houseowner to do such.
Hope this helps
Yours Trul, TheAnimeCatUwU
PLEASE HELP ME ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I'M BEING TIMED, HURRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The chronological progression of technological innovations for the mass production of textiles were:
A. The Jenny, Water Frame, Spinning Mule, Power Loom
B. The Water Frame, the Jenny, Spinning Mule, Power Loom
C. The Power Loom, Water Frame, the Jenny, Spinning Mule
D. None of the Above
a or d
re
re
re
er
ere
raerawer
In the Antebellum era, abolitionists grew in influence in the United Sates, and even in
some parts of the South. In US History, the term abolitionist refers to which of
these?
Answer:
People that wanted to put an end to slavery
Explanation:
In United States history, the term "abolitionist" refers to a group of people who actively agitated for the ending of slavery.
There were some famous abolitionists such as Harriet Tubman, Malcolm X, etc.
PLEASE HELP THIS IS DUE IN AN HOUR!!!
Answer: A conglomerate merger. Conglomerate mergers are divided into pure conglomerate mergers and mixed conglomerate mergers. is a merger between companies that are totally unrelated. ... A pure conglomerate merger involves companies that are totally unrelated and that operate in distinct markets.
Explanation:
How did the Erie Canal transform New York State?
It led to an economic depression across upstate New York that the region has yet to recover from
It caused massive environmental damage to beaver dams across upstate New York
It made railroad travel faster than ship travel between the the Great Lakes and Hudson River
It linked New York State to trade across the Great Lakes and concentrated goods from across America into New York City
Answer:
The answer is C "It made railroad travel faster than ship travel between the Great Lakes and Hudson River
Explanation:
This is because while it did cost a lot, it did not lead to an economic depression.
While it may have caused minor damage to beaver dams, it is not the most correct and proven answer
It actually linked the city with the Great Lakes, but it did not concentrate the goods, only helped transport them
I hope this helps!!!
:)
Bye bye have a great day <3
How do you suppose Grant's stand at Shiloh affected his military career?
OA) He lost so many men he was demoted.
B) He was given more responsibility as a military leader.
C) It affected his political career, but not his military career.
D) It did not affect his career either way.
It can be supposed that Grant's stand at Shiloh did not affect his military career, as it affected his political career, but not the military career. Therefore, option C holds true.
What is the significance of the Grant's stand at Shiloh?After taking his stand at the Battle of Shiloh, General Grant of the Army of Tennessee had gained an extreme amount of criticism for the acts that were undertaken under his authority. Despite the win at the Battle of Shiloh, he had been criticized by the society.
Due to such acts, the public started to show a sign of mistrust in his abilities. As a result, the political career of General Grant was heavily influenced, leaving the least amount of impact over his career in serving the military of Tennessee.
Therefore, the option C holds true regarding the significance of General Grant's stand at Shiloh.
Learn more about Grant's stand at Shiloh here:
https://brainly.com/question/16048077
#SPJ2
PLEASE HELP!!!
In the space below, construct a claim as to the effect television has had on politics. Your claim should be at least 250 words and follow these directions:
Research on your own and find a primary source on the impact of television on the U.S. government
A primary source is an original document or artifact that comes from the period of time being studied.
Someone from that time period actually wrote, created, or used the object the historian is studying.
Using the information from your primary source, and the information from the lesson, develop a claim concerning television’s effect on U.S. politics.
Fulfill the following concerning your claim:
Your claim should clearly state the effect of television on U.S. politics. Be specific.
Your claim must have supporting statements that are original ideas, as well as facts and evidence from your source and information from the lesson that supports it.
A counterclaim that refutes your claim. Your writing will identify the stance and prove that it is false.
Write an informative essay that meets the following expectations:
Establishes and maintains formal and objective tone.
Uses words, phrases, and clauses to link each section of writing together and creates cohesion between claims and evidence.
Follows expectations of conventions.
Provide a concluding paragraph that:
Synthesizes your original claim
Summarizes your key points
Adds concluding thoughts
Cite your primary source and this lesson as a secondary source at the bottom of your essay.
Television has had an immense effect on politics as it has given candidates and parties the ability to convey their messages and policies direct to the masses in the comfort of their own homes. It gives the government of the day the ability to showcase their achievements and for the opposition to oppose. It is a tool that has a wide array of uses that can aide but also destabilise.
Hope This Help :)
Answer:
They stated purpose of the operation was to degrade Saddam Hussein's weapons capabilities, to diminish Iraq's ability to attack it's or the US, to demonstrate the consequences of not cooperating with the U.N. The Invasion of Iraq was an unjust criminal operation ordered by George w bush for the intentions to get oil and money. Television has had an immense effect on politics as it has given candidates and parties the ability to convey their messages and policies direct to the masses in the comfort of their own homes. It gives the government of the day the ability to showcase their achievements and for the opposition to oppose. It is a tool that has a wide array of uses that can aide but also destabilized.
The Iraq war should have been avoided because contrary to the claims of the Bush administration there were no weapons of mass destruction only the capability to make nukes, chemical weapons, hydrogen bombs, etc. Another reason why the war should have been avoided was because the lose of life, with around one thousand American and allied troops being killed and a few thousand more injured and an estimated hundred thousand Iraqi citizens being killed with at least seven thousand having been killed by US air strikes, and the last reason is because the war destabilized the middle east even more and the invasion of Iraq made the locals more anti American and when the US pulled out this animosity toward the Americans stayed and helped give terrorist groups like the Taliban, Al Qaeda, and ISIS flourish in Iraq and it could be argued that the terrorist groups are now stronger then back in 2003 when the campaigns began.
In conclusion, I personally hate Saddam Hussein, however, The U.S has completely destroyed Iraq. The operation was an illegal war and many war crimes were committed since the beginning of the war. Saddam Hussein was a selfish, criminal, and George w bush is the exact same, only a bit smarter. Iraq's status right now can support everything I'm saying. Right now, with everyday that passes, Iraq is getting worse and worse, All thanks to Saddam Hussein and George W. Bush.
Explanation:
All of the explanations put together^
What does the author enumerate and describe in “respecting the flag”
Answer:
I really hope this helps!
Explanation:
The folding method described there shows disrespect to the flag. The folding method described there shows neither respect nor disrespect to the flag. The folding method described there shows less respect to the flag than drawing the flag up in folds.
In Nigeria, the literacy rate is 59.6%. How might improving the literacy rate affect Nigeria? A It would increase specialization. B It would lower domestic competition. C It would help raise the standard of living. D It would slow the growth rate of the economy.
Answer:
C. It would help raise the standard of living
Explanation:
Use the function rule f(x)= 3x-2. Find the output f(-1)
Answer:
since (-1) is (x)
f × (-1) = 3 × (-1) - 2
f × (-1) = (-3) - 2
f × (-1) = -1
therefore both are equal I guess?
-1 = -1 ??
Explanation:
look f.y.k.i, i.d.k the correct answer AND i.d.c if ma answer is right or wrong. just wanted the points ;)
what is the meaning of no armed force
Answer:
The armed forces are the combined military, naval, and air forces of a nation.
Explanation:
No armed force means that that country does not have those things or they are not as good as in other countries.
Other words for armed forces
-Military
-Troops
-Armament
-Armed services
-Defense forces
-Fighting machine
-Military service
-Service
only ethiopia and _____ remained free of european colonization by the start of WW1
-egypt
-south africa
-liberia
-the congo
Can one see traces of imperialism even in today's society?
Based on the article, why did the Great Migration end in the 1970s?
during Americans Westward Expansion what impact did buffalo hunting have on the American Indians of Texas
Answer:
By the 1700's the Native Americans tamed some of the buffalo, which made hunting easier. The Native Americans moved with the herds so they can have a good supply of food. ... The rest of the buffalo was used for clothing, shelter and weapons. Native American knew that their survival depended on the buffalo.
Explanation:
PLEASE HELP ASAP!!!
what topiclevents do you
know are involved in WWII? (Provide 3 examples)
Answer (Down Below)
Explanation:
November 11, 1918 WWl ends.
September 1, 1938 WWll begins.
December 13, 1939 UK Wins wars first sea battle
For every 9 pages of reading I complete 1.5 pages of notes. If I read 28 pages, how many notes will I have taken?
Explanation:
The Answer Is 42 I hope Brainliest plzAccording to the establishment clause, how would a court rule on this case?
as a direct violation of the clause because government institutions cannot support religious institutions for any reason
as a violation of the clause because the government gave more money to religious schools than public schools
as in compliance with the clause because the government’s action was for a secular purpose, did not advance a particular religion, and was unentangled
as in compliance with the clause because the government gave money to fewer religious schools than public schools
Answer:
C
Explanation:
edge
Answer:
C
Explanation:
as in compliance with the clause because the government’s action was for a secular purpose, did not advance a particular religion, and was unentangled
Which statement best describes democratic governments?
Answer:
you didn't post a picture
Answer:
The military owes allegiance to the country, not one person
How do you think Benjamin Hardin Helm felt about Abraham Lincoln’s offer? Why?
Please help i need it
Answer:
Helm felt indecisive about taking the deal/ offer.
Explanation:
Even though Lincoln's offer was generous, Helm struggled with his decision because, by accepting it, he would be turning against much of his family, including members who had already joined the Confederate army. However, by refusing it, he would cut himself off from other members of the family, such as the Lincolns. .
The way that Benjamin Hardy felt was that if he accepts Lincoln's offer some members of his family would be against him while refusing it would also turn some members of his family against him.
What was Lincoln offering Benjamin Hardy?President Lincoln was offering Benjamin the post of paymaster of the Union Army so that he would convince him to let Kentucky join the Union side.
Benjamin struggled with the decision because most of his family were fighting already on the Confederate side, while the Lincolns were also family, refusing it would turn them against him.
Read more on Lincoln here: https://brainly.com/question/26112254
#SPJ2
Who was in charge of the concentration camps
Answer:
Hitler was in charge of the concentration camps in ww2...
In Europe :D
HELP ILL GIVE CROWN THINGY!!!!!!!!!!!
2. The excerpt is best understood as a response to which of the following historical developments?
“That any attempts by congress to interfere with the institution of slavery in any of the territories of the United States would create just grounds of alarm in many of the States of the union; and that such interference is unnecessary, inexpedient, and in violation of good faith; since, when any such territory applies for admission in to the union as a state, the people thereof alone have the right, and should be left free and unrestrained, to decide such question for themselves.”
-Source: State Senator Broderick, Journal of the California Legislature, 1850
a the adoption of an antislavery platform by the Democratic Party
b the change in population in California following the discovery of gold
c the rise of debates in the federal government over the extension of slavery
d the emergence of the Free Soil Party as a major contender in the election of 1848
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The answer is A because the excerpt talks about how an interference with congress would alarm many states of the union. Thus further meaning if congress got between states and their right to own slaves it would become a bigger problem. The excerpt goes on further to say that it is well within ones rights to own a slave, further implying that Democrats are pushing anti-slavery.