What is the radius of the circle made by Ana’s sister in the green car? Use 3.14 for pi and round your answer to the nearest tenth. Show your work.

Answer:

bowl a: 11/8 pounds of chili

bowl b: 11/24 pounds of chili

bowl c: 33/48

Answer:

4 2 5 6

Ones : 6

Tens : 5

Hundreds : 2

Thousands : 4

Step-by-step explanation:

hope I'm right

Answer:

[tex]A=745.06[/tex]

[tex]C=96.76[/tex]

Answer: B

Step-by-step explanation:

JUST DID A QUIZ WITH IT

Answer:

Coordinates switch, and the new y-coordinate changes sign

Explanation:

We have point A with the coordinates (-1,2), when we rotate it c90º it becomes (2,1).

What happened? The coordinates switched and the x-coordinate of A (-1) became the y-coordinate of A' (1) and it changed its sign.

Answer:

A. The coordinates switch and the new x-coordinate changes sign

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helps! ✌️

Answer:

a. IH and JK

b. IK and HJ

c. HK

Step-by-step explanation:

IH and JK are the minor arcs because the other arcs (IJ and HK) are major arcs. They (IH and JK) are minor arcs because they are acute angle and the other arcs are Obtuse.

IK and HJ are semicircles because they are two points that is forming a line between the circle. two points that are connected, is already a semicircle.

HK is a major arc because it's central angle is obtuse.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

16

Step-by-step explanation:

Edit: Lol I learned this a while ago but imagine a ladder 5 or more goes up for sure 4 or less let it rest. Meaning anything over 5 goes up to the next digit and anything lower like 4 stays on that number

Answer:

16.

15.74 is closer to 16 than 15

Answer:

3.14

Step-by-step explanation:

The answer is going to be 3.14

Hope it helps!

Answer:

1: 14z+2

2: 7z/4 + 5x

3: y²/3z

Answer:

The length that separates the bottom 5% is of 4.87 centimeters.

The length that separates the top 5% is of 5.03 centimeters.

Step-by-step explanation:

Normal Probability Distribution:

Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the z-score of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

Mean of 4.95 centimeters and a standard deviation of 0.05 centimeters.

This means that [tex]\mu = 4.95, \sigma = 0.05[/tex]

Bottom 5%:

The 5th percentile, which is X when Z has a pvalue of 0.05. So X when Z = -1.645.

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]-1.645 = \frac{X - 4.95}{0.05}[/tex]

[tex]X - 4.95 = -1.645*0.05[/tex]

[tex]X = 4.87[/tex]

The length that separates the bottom 5% is of 4.87 centimeters.

Top 5%:

The 100 - 5 = 95th percentile, which is X when Z has a pvalue of 0.95. So X when Z = 1.645.

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]1.645 = \frac{X - 4.95}{0.05}[/tex]

[tex]X - 4.95 = 1.645*0.05[/tex]

[tex]X = 5.03[/tex]

The length that separates the top 5% is of 5.03 centimeters.

Answer:

The 99% confidence interval for average weekly earnings in the entire population is between $416.42 and $452.66. This means that we are 99% sure that the true population mean weekly earnings is between these two values.

Due to the smaller margin of error, the confidence interval would be smaller, that is, less likely to contain the true population mean.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have that to find our [tex]\alpha[/tex] level, that is the subtraction of 1 by the confidence interval divided by 2. So:

[tex]\alpha = \frac{1 - 0.99}{2} = 0.005[/tex]

Now, we have to find z in the Ztable as such z has a pvalue of [tex]1 - \alpha[/tex].

That is z with a pvalue of [tex]1 - 0.005 = 0.995[/tex], so Z = 2.575.

Now, find the margin of error M as such

[tex]M = z\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]

In which [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the standard deviation of the population and n is the size of the sample.

[tex]M = 2.575\frac{294.67}{\sqrt{1744}} = 18.17[/tex]

The lower end of the interval is the sample mean subtracted by M. So it is 434.49 - 18.17 = $416.42

The upper end of the interval is the sample mean added to M. So it is 434.49 + 18.17 = $452.66

The 99% confidence interval for average weekly earnings in the entire population is between $416.42 and $452.66. This means that we are 99% sure that the true population mean weekly earnings is between these two values.

If you constructed a 90% confidence interval instead, would it be smaller or larger? What is the intuition?

For a 90% confidence interval, we would have z = 1.645.

Looking at the margin of error formula, M and z are direct proportional, that is, as z decreases so does M. Due to the smaller margin of error, the confidence interval would be smaller, that is, less likely to contain the true population mean.

The linear relationship is proportional

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

Using the above as a guide, we have the following:

Unit rate = Cost of banana/Number of banans

substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation

Unit rate = 9/1

Evaluate

Unit rate = 9 cent per banana

This means that the linear relationship is proportional

Read more about proportional relationship at

https://brainly.com/question/28651666

#SPJ1

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

What you do on one side of the equation, you do to the other. She added 10x on the right side and subtracted 10x on the left when she should have added 10x on both sides.

Answer:

Black Fur: 100%    White Fur: 0%

Step-by-step explanation:

    B     B

b  Bb  Bb              (all dominant)

b  Bb  Bb

Black Fur: 100%  White Fur: 0%

Answer:

B B

______

b | Bb | Bb |

b | Bb | Bb |

_____

Phenotype Probability (%):

Black Fur: 100%

White Fur: 0%

_____________________

Answer:

15 using the Pythagorean theorem.

hope it helps, plz mark me as brainliest.

Answer:

15 units is the answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

points are (-3,-4) and (6,8)

Pythagorean theorem can be written as,

[tex]d=\sqrt{(x_2-x_1)^2 + (y_2-y_1)^2} \\\\d=\sqrt{(6-(-3))^2 + (8-(-4))^2}\\\\d=\sqrt{(9)^2+(12)^2} \\\\d=\sqrt{81+144} \\\\d=\sqrt{225} \\\\d=15[/tex]

∴ d = 15 units is the distance between the points.

Answer:

16days

Step-by-step explanation:

This is an inverse proportionality

Let the number of men be m

Let the time taken in days be d

Hence m ∝ 1/d

m = k/d

If 8 men can complete the project in 24 days, then;

8 = k/24

k = 8*24

k = 192

To determine the time it will take 12 men to complete the same job, we will say;

m = k/d

12 = 192/d

d = 192/12

d = 16

Hence it will take 12men 16days to finish the same job

Answer:

$86.75 i think

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

33-21=9

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

8 Dozen eggs would mean, 8 X 12 = 96 eggs

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]\frac{2}{3}[/tex]

or

0.67

Step-by-step explanation:

a dozen is 12

12/4 = 3

8/4 = 2

8 is 2/3 of a dozen(12)

2/ 3 = 0.66666666666667 which is about 0.67

Answer:

1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

Probability of getting an odd number on a die = 3/6 = 1/2

Probability of getting tails on a coin = 1/2

Now you multiply both probabilities since the question says "and". If it says "or", then you add the probabilities.

1/2 × 1/2 = 1/4

Answer:

11 cups

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

11 us cups are in 5 1/2 pints

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps

Answer:

C. =

Step-by-step explanation:

Two ways to think about this problem:

1st way: 100% and 1 are all a whole, therefore, they are equal.

2nd way: 1=1/1. Multiply the denominator and the numerator by 100, 1/1=100/100=100%

Answer:

Decreases, decreases, increases

Just took the test

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The answer is A

Step-by-step explanation:

A: ay=sin(x +c)+d  I got a 100 on the test

Answer:

2y + 367

Step-by-step explanation:

8(2y - 1) - 14y + 375

16y - 8 - 14y + 375

2y + 367

Answer:

H₀ should be rejected at CI 95% .

Then the proportion of adults with 95 % CI is bigger than the proportion of teen

Step-by-step explanation:

From adult sample:

n₂ = 2323

x₂ = 1601

p₂ = 1601 / 2323         p₂  = 0,689       or    p₂ = 68,9%

From teen sample:

n₁ = 875

x₁ = 555

p₁ = 555/ 875           p₁  = 0,634          or    p₁  = 63,4

Values of p₁  and  p₂   suggest that the proportion of adults consuming at least one meat free meal per week is bigger than teen proportion.

To either prove or reject the above statement we have to develop a difference of proportion test according to:

Hypothesis test:

Null Hypothesis                   H₀             p₁  =  p₂

Alternative Hypothesis       Hₐ             p₂  > p₁

So is a one-tail test to the right

We can establish a confidence interval of 95 % then  α = 5 %

or    α = 0,05

As the samples are big enough we will develop a z test

Then  z(c)  for α = 0,05   from z table is     z(c) = 1,64

To calculate z(s)

z(s) = ( p₂  -  p₁ ) / √p*q* ( 1/n₁  + 1/n₂ )

where p = ( x₁ + x₂ ) / n₁ + n₂       p = 555 + 1601 / 875 + 2323

p = 2156/3198       p = 0,674

and   q = 1 - 0,674        q = 0,326

z(s) = ( 0,689 - 0,634 ) / √0,674*0,326 ( 1/875 + 1 / 2323

z(s) = 0,055/ √ 0,2197 ( 0,00114 + 0,00043)

z(s) = 0,055/ √0,2197* 0,00157

z(s) = 0,055/ √ 3,45*10⁻⁴

z(s) = 0,055 / 1,85*10⁻²

z(s) = 5,5/1,85

z(s) = 2,97

Comparing  z(s) and z(c)     z(s) > z(c)

Then z(s) is in the rejection region we reject H₀.

We can claim that the proportion of adult eating at least one meat-free meal is bigger than the proportion of teen