What does the contest between Athena and Poseidon consist of?

Question 3 options:

Athena and Poseidon will race to the top of the hill


Athena and Poseidon will show off their strength in a tug-of-war match


Athena and Poseidon will offer a gift to the people of the city. Whoever offers the best gift wins.


Athena and Poseidon will have a swimming match to the furthest island and back

hes a hero obviously

Answer:

he is a villian

Explanation:

Answer:

the leader who won the Nobel prize for literature was Winston Churchill

Answer:

C

Explanation:

It was the law of the land.

Answer:

Montesquieu Influence. Montesquieu's views and studies of governments led to him to believe that government corruption was probable if a system of government didn't include balance of powers. He conceived the idea of separating government authority into the three major branches: executive, legislative and judicial.

Explanation:

Montesquieu was a French lawyer, man of letters, and one of the most influential political philosophers of the Age of Enlightenment. His political theory work, particularly the idea of separation of powers, shaped the modern democratic government.

Answer:

Considering what life was like back then, it would be the most logical to say that the correct answer is B

Explanation:

Generally speaking, women weren't given many rights to do anything outside of stay home and take care of the house and/or children, so it makes sense to say that they get additional status by taking on another challenge such as a job

The economic system which governed the colonisation of the Americas was mercantilism or merchant capitalism. To be effective, mercantilism had to operate in tandem with colonialism to ensure that the wealth of the subordinated country belonged to the dominant one. It was believed that if the mother country could control all goods in and out of the colony, ensuring that no other country could trade with it, then she would have total control of the wealth that derived from the settlement. Thus, all goods produced in the Spanish colonies had to be exported to Spain and settlers could only officially purchase goods from Spain. Bullion and agricultural products would profit Spanish citizens and expand her treasury as well as increase employment and industries such as shipbuilding.

Spain took several steps to effect her monopolisation of the Americas. In the first place, to solidify her ‘discovery’ and ensure that her claim was recognised, effectively monopolising the Americas in accordance with her mercantilist aspirations, Isabella and Ferdinand sought the ratification of Pope Alexander VI. The Pope divided the world outside of Europe in half. Lands to the west of the Azores belonged to Spain and those to the east belonged to Portugal. This was the Treaty of Tordesillas, ratified in 1494 wherein Portugal would receive Brazil and West Africa, while all 'discoveries' in the Americas belonged to Spain. Though Spain and Portugal, Roman Catholic countries, believed that the Pope’s authority would ensure that Christian Europe would recognise their American claims, the Reformation resulted in Protestant countries such as England and Holland to whom his endorsement of the Treaty of Tordesillas meant very little. In fact, they believed that the Pope should not be involved in secular affairs such as this. France was also interested in Spain's overseas colonies and ignored the Pope's endorsement.

Answer:

Despite her attempts, England, Holland and France managed to oppose Spain's monopoly in several ways; through exploration, piracy/privateering/buccaneering, smuggling (trading illegally with Spanish colonists) and settlement

Explanation: Please be more Specific Thanks

Answer:

In order to sustain it wealth base, Britain felt is was important to keep the goods and materials from the colonies to themselves

Answer:

Have any changes been made to the Treaty 3 to make right with the Indigenous Peoples in Canada?

yes because they wanted to make things right because back in the day when war was around the war that was between them to didnt do nothing for them so they just decided to end it

Explanation:

Answer:

The Supreme Court established that congressional power extends beyond the scope of the Constitution and that state governments cannot interfere with the federal government. McCulloch v. Maryland was a decision by the Supreme Court of the US in which the state of Maryland had attempted to form the second bank of the US by imposing a tax on all notes of banks not chartered in Maryland.  The court invoked the Necessary and Proper Clause of the Constitution, which allowed Federal government to pass laws not expressly provided in the Constitution's list of express powers, provided those laws are in useful.

Answer:

moses

Explanation:

bible

Answer:

St . Petersburg

Explanation:

The Russian ballet the nutcracker was first performed in St . Petersburg. The Nutcracker is a two-act ballet that was first choreographed by Marius Petipa and Lev Ivanov. It tells the story of a young girl named Clara.

A story is a narrative that conveys a sequence of events, either real or fictional, that are told or written to entertain, inform, or persuade an audience.

The purpose of a story can vary, from simply entertaining and engaging the audience to conveying important ideas or messages, exploring the human experience, or providing insight into a particular culture or society.

At St . Petersburg the Russian ballet the nutcracker was first performed. The Nutcracker has become one of the most popular ballets in the world and is often performed during the holiday season.

Learn more about story here:

https://brainly.com/question/9148951

#SPJ6

Answer:

I believe it's the last option

Explanation:

although all could be true, the last option seems like the most profound reason the author chose that headline :)

Answer:

C

Explanation:

The stegosaurus existed 156-144 MYA and the T rex existed 66 MYA, so doing math, we can see that the T rex and the stegosaurus were 78 MYA apart. Hope this helps!

I don't know I don't know I don't k ow

Answer:

The Columbine effect is the legacy and impact of the 1999 Columbine High School massacre. The shooting has inspired numerous copycat crimes, with many killers taking their inspiration from Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, by describing the two perpetrators as being martyrs. The shooting has also had a significant impact on popular culture.

Background:

On April 20, 1999, Columbine High School seniors, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, murdered 12 students and one teacher then injured 24 others. Around 50 minutes after the shooting began, Harris and Klebold took their own lives in the library, where the majority of their victims died.[1] It was at the time, the deadliest shooting at a high school in American history.[2] The shooting was the most covered news story of 1999, and third most followed by the American public of the entire decade.[3]

Effects on schools:

Following the Columbine shooting, schools across the United States instituted new security measures such as transparent backpacks, metal detectors, school uniforms, and security guards. Some schools implemented the numbering of school doors to improve public safety response. Several schools throughout the country resorted to requiring students to wear computer-generated IDs.[4]

Schools also adopted a zero tolerance approach to possession of weapons and threatening behavior by students.[5] Despite the effort, several social science experts feel the zero tolerance approach adopted in schools has been implemented too harshly, with unintended consequences creating other problems.[6] Despite the safety measures that were implemented in the wake of the tragedy at Columbine, school shootings continued to take place in the United States at an alarming rate. Virginia Tech, Sandy Hook, and Stoneman Douglas were three subsequent school shootings that far surpassed the casualties of the 1999 massacre, subsequently raising concern of gun violence in the United States.

Police tactics:

Police departments reassessed their tactics and since then train for Columbine-like situations after criticism over the slow response and progress of the SWAT teams during the shooting.[7][8] Sheriff Stone did not seek reelection.

Police followed a traditional tactic at Columbine: surround the building, set up a perimeter, and contain the damage. That approach has been replaced by a tactic known as the Immediate Action Rapid Deployment tactic. This tactic calls for a four-person team to advance into the site of any ongoing shooting, optimally a diamond-shaped wedge, but even with just a single officer if more are not available. Police officers using this tactic are trained to move toward the sound of gunfire and neutralize the shooter as quickly as possible.[9] Their goal is to stop the shooter at all costs; they are to walk past wounded victims, as the aim is to prevent the shooter from killing or wounding more. Dave Cullen has stated: "The active protocol has proved successful at numerous shootings...At Virginia Tech alone, it probably saved dozens of lives."[10]

Hope it helps, pls mark me as brainliest!

Answer:

Columbine is important because it got the most media attention and was the deadliest school shooting in America at the time. The fact that there were two perpetrators instead of one added to the infamy of the shooting.

Answer:

one is appointed based on state population

Explanation:

an the other is equal representation

Answer:

1759

Hit brainliest if this was helpful :)

What was America's public opinion on ww1?

On August 4, as World War I erupted across Europe, President Woodrow Wilson proclaimed America's neutrality, stating the nation “must be neutral in fact as well as in name during these days that are to try men's souls.” With no vital interests at stake, many Americans supported this position.

Answer:

moral principles that govern a person's behavior or the conducting of an activity.

Explanation:

Answer:

because

Explanation:

i know because

Answer:n modern political thought, there are two approaches to the justification of democracy as the best system of government: value-based and rationally utilitarian. Value justifications regard democracy as a value in itself, as a political system that most fully embodies the most important humanistic values: freedom, equality, justice, etc.

The value approach is criticized primarily for its appeal to a democratically minded person who is truly striving for freedom and political equality. However, in the modern world, very many people, if not most, prefer not freedom (which they often perceive even as anti-value), but material well-being, security, and order. Therefore, they put a non-political, social meaning in the most respected values ​​of equality and justice, linking them to ensuring equal opportunities in life or rewarding merit, to which real democracy has a very weak relationship. All this casts doubt on the value group of arguments in favor of democracy.

A rational-utilitarian approach does not deny the certain significance of the value justifications of democracy, but at the same time pushes them to the background. This approach interprets democracy primarily as the most rational, useful way for citizens to organize a political system, allowing them to articulate and harmoniously combine their interests. The most consistently rational-utilitarian group of arguments is expressed in the systemic justifications of democracy: Democracy helps to prevent the rule of dictators, curb power, guarantee the protection of citizens from state arbitrariness; Democracy provides a higher level of economic development and higher rates of economic growth.

Of course, democracy, like any other political system, is not free from serious shortcomings, which, in fact, represent a continuation of its merits. Usually attention is paid to the following weaknesses of democracy:

1. The threat of destabilization of the political system arising from the very principle of election.

2. Political competition can result in conflict ogenicity, confrontation, open clashes and, therefore, destabilization of the situation in society.

3. The danger of the tyranny of the majority, confident in its "rightness" and suppressing the will of those who remain in the minority.

4. Possible unprofessionalism of officials elected by an incompetent majority.

Explanation:

Explanation: answer is more to the bottom

Answer:

Here.

Explanation:

"Mom? Can I talk to you, please?"

"Sure, okay." They both sit down at the kitchen table, silent for a moment until Sophia speaks.

"I'm a bit upset because you were late to pick me up from practice. Practice ends at a certain time, and I would appreciate if you could pick me up earlier, please. Or come earlier to pick me up so that you won't be late anymore."

"I understand and I'm sorry. Thanks for telling me."

"Thanks for listening, mom."

The most important factor in Andrew Jackson’s successful bid for the presidency in 1828 was his:

Let's understand why this answer is correct by getting to know Andrew Jackson.

Thus, Jackson's reputation as a hero of the war in 1812 paved way for his successful bid for presidency.

Learn more about General Andrew Jackson on https://brainly.com/question/11704106

Answer:

Vice President Andrew John took over the presidency in 1865 due to the fact that the current president died and Andrew was in the line of succession.