Elijah McCoy, after inventing the "drip cup" faced challenges and discrimination in his professional life due to racial prejudice and attempts to undermine his invention.
Despite Elijah McCoy's invention of the "drip cup," which revolutionized the lubrication process in steam engines, he encountered significant obstacles and mistreatment. McCoy's African-American heritage likely played a role in the difficulties he faced. Textual evidence supports this conclusion. For instance, an article from the Detroit Free Press in 1884 stated, "He [McCoy] has had many imitators, but no equals... The growth of a negro inventor in the mechanical line is something unusual, if not remarkable." This quote suggests that McCoy's accomplishments were seen as remarkable due to his race, highlighting the racial prejudice prevalent during that time.
Moreover, another article from the Atlanta Daily World in 1920 described McCoy's experiences, stating, "White competitors tried to discourage his work, or steal his ideas." This statement indicates that McCoy not only encountered racial discrimination but also faced attempts by others to undermine his invention or claim credit for his ideas. These challenges and mistreatment demonstrate the racial bias and discrimination that McCoy had to overcome in his professional life, despite his significant contributions to technological advancements.
To learn more about Elijah McCoy.
Click here:brainly.com/question/26698246?
#SPJ11
To what river does Alexander continue his conquest?
Please i needd help and verry fast
I gave all my points
What are some effects of the concentration camp in Auschwitz to the Jews?
Which of the following is the most accurate example of President Taft's policy of "dollar diplomacy"?
A) maintaining a military force to discourage European colonization in Latin America
B) exerting economic influence rather than military force in Latin American countries
C) allowing for the nationalization of Latin American property owned by US citizens
D) using international trade organizations to stabilize Latin American economies
Answer:
B) exerting economic influence rather than military force in Latin American countries
Explanation:
Dollar diplomacy is an offshoot of the President Roosevelt intervention which was initiated by President Taft inorder to exert economic influence in most Latin America as well as stablise the American economy.
To him, it is better in substituting dollars for bullets as seen in the excerpts of his address to the congress on December 3, 1912. The phrase "Dollar deplomacy" was picked up by his critics after the address due to the fact that, he preferred to protect American enterprises abroad rather than engage in war
What resulted from the closing of the Bank of the United States?
Answer:
When its charter expired in 1836, the Second Bank ended its operations as a national institution. It was reestablished as a commercial bank under the laws of Pennsylvania, where it continued to operate until its failure in 1841.
the events that occurred as a result of the closing of the Second National Bank. After the Second National Bank closed, smaller state and private banks failed, land values decreased, people lost their jobs, and an economic depression began.
What term is used to refer to the land that the monarch awarded the noble within the feudal world?
Answer:
Classic feudalism
Explanation:
In broad terms a lord was a noble who held land, a vassal was a person who was granted possession of the land by the lord, and the land was known as a fief. In exchange for the use of the fief and protection by the lord, the vassal would provide some sort of service to the lord.
Why is fascism difficult to define?
apush leq three choices evaluate the extent to which ideas of self govemener influnceed americancolonical reaction to bri
The extent to which ideas of self-government influenced the American colonial reaction to British imperial authority during the period of 1763 to 1775 can be evaluated by examining the role of colonial assemblies, colonial resistance movements, and intellectual developments in colonial thought.
Firstly, colonial assemblies were a key vehicle for the expression of self-government. The colonial assemblies functioned as local governing bodies with the authority to make laws and regulations. By controlling taxation and other government functions, the colonial assemblies were able to exert a significant degree of self-government over the colonies. This influence was particularly evident in the Stamp Act crisis of 1765, when colonial assemblies throughout the colonies passed resolutions denouncing the tax and calling for its repeal.Secondly, colonial resistance movements played a critical role in the American colonial reaction to British imperial authority. From the non-importation agreements to the Boston Tea Party, these movements challenged British authority and demonstrated the extent to which colonists were willing to take action to defend their rights and liberties. These movements were often led by local elites, such as merchants and lawyers, who were influenced by Enlightenment ideas of natural rights and popular sovereignty.Finally, intellectual developments in colonial thought also played a key role in shaping American colonial reaction to British imperial authority. From the work of John Locke to the ideas of colonial leaders such as James Otis and Samuel Adams, Enlightenment ideas about the rights of individuals and the sovereignty of the people were central to colonial political thought. The influence of these ideas can be seen in documents such as the Declaration of Rights and Grievances, which was issued by the Stamp Act Congress in 1765.In conclusion, the ideas of self-government were central to the American colonial reaction to British imperial authority during the period of 1763 to 1775. Through their participation in colonial assemblies, resistance movements, and intellectual developments, colonists were able to assert their rights and liberties and challenge British authority.
To know more about government, visit ;
https://brainly.com/question/1078669
#SPJ11
Which of the following was not rationed during world war 2
Answer:
Explanation:
Fruit and vegetables were never rationed
what does truman mean by this quote? "the world is not static, and the status quo is not sacred."
The quote "the world is not static, and the status quo is not sacred" by Truman means that everything in the world changes and the established state of affairs is not necessarily sacred. In other words, Truman is saying that the status quo, or the current state of affairs, is not necessarily sacred or unchangeable. The world is not static refers to the idea that the world is always changing, and new things are coming into being while others are passing away.
This means that the status quo, or the current state of affairs, is not necessarily sacred or unchangeable. What was once considered a norm, in Truman's opinion, may not be suitable in the present day. Therefore, the status quo is not something that should be held onto as a matter of principle because it can be harmful to the people.
Know more about Truman here:
https://brainly.com/question/3449150
#SPJ11
1. What was the land South of Egypt referred to by the Ancient Greeks & Romans?
A. Ethiopia
B. Persia
C. Arabia
D. Libya
Which is not an accomplishment of King Ezana?
A. Issued coins that featured the cross
B. Spread Judaism in Africa
C. Written accounts of his conquests
D. Convertion to Christianity
King Caleb led a military campaign against:
A. Kingdom of Adulis
B. Kingdom of Himyar
C. Kingdom of Raydan
D. Kingdom of Marib
Answer:
A. EthiopiaB. Spread Judaism in AfricaB. Kingdom of HimyarExplanation:
The southern portion, which extended north to the southern end of the second cataract of the Nile was known as Upper Nubia; this was called Kush (Cush) under the 18th-dynasty pharaohs of ancient Egypt and was called Ethiopia by the ancient Greeks.Ezana (active early to middle 4th century) was an Ethiopian king during the Axumite period. His reign marked a turning point in Ethiopian history because Christianity became the state religion when he became the first Christian king.Procopius, John of Ephesus, and other contemporary historians recount Kaleb's invasion of Yemen around 520, against the Himyarite king, Yusuf Asar Yathar, known as Dhu Nuwas, a Jew who was persecuting the Christian community of Najran.The Gold Rush
12. How long after the Mexican-American War did they discover gold in California?
27:28 - 35:41
13. Give at least one example of a large price increase.
14. What was wrong with the graves?
35:55 - 44:01
Frontier Life
15. What was the cause of "milk sickness?"
A caused by eating white snakeroot, w which
contains a toric alcohol.
16. Who was the young man chopping wood?
17. What was Jackson's new American Indian policy?
18. How did people float their goods down the Mississippi?
19. Abraham Lincoln encounters a new invention on the Mississippi - what was it?
20. What was wrong with the first steamboats?
Answer: 12. January 24, 1848
thats all i know
Explanation:
true/false. the formal study of ethics goes back to at least 2,400 years, to the greek philospher socrates.
True. The formal study of ethics can be traced back at least 2,400 years to the Greek philosopher Socrates.
The statement is true. The formal study of ethics does indeed have its roots in ancient Greek philosophy, specifically with the philosopher Socrates. Socrates, who lived from 469 to 399 BCE, is considered one of the founding figures of Western philosophy and ethics. He engaged in dialogues and discussions with his contemporaries, examining questions of moral virtue, justice, and the nature of the good life.
His method of questioning and inquiry, known as the Socratic method, laid the groundwork for ethical inquiry and critical thinking. Socrates' teachings and influence on subsequent philosophers like Plato and Aristotle have shaped the development of ethical theories and the study of ethics over the course of history. Therefore, the formal study of ethics can indeed be traced back to at least 2,400 years, to the time of Socrates.
Learn more about Socratic method here: brainly.com/question/29054927
#SPJ11
You will create two "I AM" poems, one from the perspective of Eugene Talmadge and one from the perspective of a person who was against Eugene Talmadge. Once you have written the two "I AM" poems, you will then BE THE JUDGE and decide if you are pro or anti Talmadge and explain why. You will need to read the article "Eugene Talmadge" (Links to an external site.) from the New Georgia Encyclopedia to help you with the You Be the Judge assignment.
Answer:
Policies for the welfare of farmer and lowering taxes.
Explanation:
Eugene Talmadge takes good decision as a governor of Georgia by idealizing the small farmer and improves the economic conditions of the farmer due to its policies while on the other hand, I am also against of some polices of Eugene Talmadge which was taken in his government by lowering the taxes because these taxes provides huge capital to run the state so by lowering taxes decreases the economy of the state and leads to instability.
Before Guido d'Arezzo invented music staff notation, music was taught by rote. Which meant the teacher would ______ the song over and over until the student learned it. *
A). show
B). sing
C). clap
D). hum
What advantages did the South have for fighting the war?
Answer:
The South's greatest strength lay in the fact that it was fighting on the defensive in its own territory. Familiar with the landscape, Southerners could harass Northern invaders. The military and political objectives of the Union were much more difficult to accomplish.
Explanation:
Internet
The largest group of African American professionals in Texas in the early 1900s was ministers and teachers. Select one: True or False
What was the name of Charles Lindbergh's plane?
Atlantic Flyer
Atlantic Express
Spirit of Charleston
Spirit of St. Louis
Answer:
D. spirit of St. Louis. Hope that helps
How many years did the Persian Wars last?
Answer:
50 year the Persian war last that's the right answer
True or False: The Union did little to help the South rebuild during
Reconstruction
Answer:
true. the answer is TRUE
Answer:
false
Explanation:
look at the picture. please help me! :(
Answer:
the US millitary
Explanation:
The U.S military was first
Q: Who didn’t like the Missouri Compromise
PLEASE HELP FOR 20 POINTS
Answer:That Douglas didn't like that idea about the Missouri compromise
Explanation: answers.com
Answer:
Jefferson did not like the Missouri Compromise
Explanation:
Jefferson continued the argument against the Missouri Compromise in examining which part of government held the power to address slavery. He contended that the states should vote on the issue of slavery, not Congress.
What were the main 2 reasons for the American Civil War??
Answer:
1. The south wanted to keep slaves
2. The north wanted to outlaw slaves
Explanation:
Answer:
The two main reasons for the American Civil War were dependent upon which side you supported. The union wanted to free the slaves and economic and cultural differences aided in disagreements between free and slave states. The confederacy on the other hand mainly fought to protect their rights. While some fought to keep their slaves, the majority of southerners did not believe it was right for the northern states to push them around. Other issues such as taxes, tariffs, and southern loyalty to their states made this a complicated war.
Explanation:
A gives an inventor the sole legal right to an invention and its profits for a certain period of time.
Answer:
A patent gives an inventor the sole legal right to an invention and its profits for a certain period of time.
what does the map tell you about asokas commitment to his laws
Answer: Asoka's map tell you about Asoka level of commitment to this laws is it reveals by the number of rocks and pillars and their widespread distribution. Asoka's commitment is revealed by the number of rocks and pillars, their widespread distribution and, as the first teacher note says, their placement in strategic positions for travelers to see.
Explanation:
on tribal lands, the tribal constitution is more powerful than the united states constitution. please select the best answer from the choices provided
true or false
False. The United States Constitution holds supreme authority within the United States, including tribal lands.
The U.S. Constitution establishes the framework for the federal government and sets forth fundamental rights and principles that apply to all individuals within the country, regardless of their tribal affiliation. While tribal nations have their own constitutions, laws, and governing bodies, they operate within the framework established by the U.S. Constitution. Tribal governments have a degree of sovereignty and self-governance, but this sovereignty is subject to the overarching authority of the federal government and the U.S. Constitution.
In cases of conflict between tribal and federal law, the U.S. Constitution takes precedence.
To learn more about tribal constitution here brainly.com/question/32437336
#SPJ11
Why does Tojo say that it would be hard for Japan to pull their troops out of China
Answer:
Why does Tojo say that it would be hard for Japan to pull their troops out of China? He says it would be difficult because of the lives they've lost in the effort would have died in vain.
Explanation:
bosten tea party person
Answer:
samuel adams
Explanation:
Answer:
sammy boi
Explanation:
according to paul in romans, sanctification includes the imputation of god’s
According to Paul in Romans, sanctification includes the imputation of God's righteousness. Paul asserts in Romans that sanctification involves the attribution of God's righteousness to believers as a transformative process.
In the book of Romans, the apostle Paul explores the concept of sanctification, which refers to the process of being made holy or set apart for God's purposes. In this context, Paul emphasizes the imputation of God's righteousness as an essential aspect of sanctification. Imputation is the act of attributing or crediting something to someone.
Paul teaches that through faith in Jesus Christ, believers are justified before God, meaning they are declared righteous in His sight. This justification is not based on one's own merits or works, but it is a gift of God's grace. As part of the process of sanctification, believers receive the imputation of God's righteousness. This means that God, through His mercy and grace, credits the righteousness of Christ to believers, transforming them from a state of sinfulness to one of righteousness. It is through this imputed righteousness that believers are sanctified and enabled to live in accordance with God's will.
Paul's teachings on sanctification and the imputation of God's righteousness in Romans emphasize the central role of God's grace in the process of spiritual transformation. It underscores that sanctification is not merely a human effort or achievement, but it is a divine work accomplished through the imputation of God's righteousness to believers. This understanding of sanctification as a gift of God's grace serves to highlight the believer's dependence on God and the transformative power of His righteousness working within them.
Learn more about Jesus Christ : brainly.com/question/11881407
#SPJ11
Why did the influenza epidemic that is described in the pasage become a good to
A)
lack of knowledge about gems
as a result of increased air travel
due to creation of concentration camps
D)
due to soldiers returning home after World War I
Wich statement BEST explains why World War I can be called a true "world war?
Answer:
due to creation of concentration camps.
Explanation:
Influenza epidemic starts in the military and concentration camps which affected the soldiers and spreads to the local people when the soldiers return to their homes. This disease cause by the virus named H1N1 virus. The World War I can be called a true "world war'' because major countries of the world participated in this war. In this war, some countries are present in one group while on the other hand, other countries join the other group for mutual benefits and purpose.
Describe what life is really like under these totalitarian governments?