Answer:
I. Natural Rights of the Colonists as Men. Among the natural rights of the Colonists are these: First, a right to life; Secondly, to liberty; Thirdly, to property; together with the right to support and defend them in the best manner they can.
(3.03 MC)
Compare the emergence of advanced civilizations in Meso and South America with the
four early river valley civilizations.
Which of the following represents a major difference between the Incas and the
Phoenicians? (1 point)
The Incas relied heavily on trade, but the Phoenicians did not
The Phoenicians relied heavily on trade, but the Incas did not.
The Incas had a system of writing but the Phoenicians did not.
The Phoenicians had a system of writing, but the Incas did not
Answer:
gttttttttttttgtgtgtgatgatagtagatagtagagtagtagtagtagtagagagtgatagtagatgatgatfga
Explanation:
de, but the Phoenicians did not
The Phoenicians relied heavily on trade, but the Incas did not.
tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttThe Incas had a system of writing but the Phoenicians did not.
The Phoenicians had a system of writing, but the Incas did not
Hold on, our servers are swamped. Wait for your answer to fully load.
In Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl, Anne and her family hide in the Secret Annexe.
What is the meaning of annexe?
a cluster of small houses
a small and isolated neighborhood
a building or wing that is accessible from a main building
a building or wing that is only accessible from an outside entrance
Answer:
a building or wing that is accessible from a main building
Explanation:
plz done get mad if im wrong
the ancient egyptians did not have schools therefore they didn't think education was important true or false
Answer:
false education was important in egypt
Explanation:
The body of water that lies south of Cuba and east of Central America is the __________.
A.
Gulf of California
B.
Caribbean Sea
C.
Rio Grande
D.
Gulf of Mexico
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
A
B
C
D
Answer:
The answer is D: Rio Grande
(Also correct on Edge 2021)
Answer:
B
Explanation:
I was doing it on edge2021 and got it wrong it showed me the correct answer which is b :) Hope this helps yall!! yave a great day :D
If the United States was to ever be in the positioned as Cambodia (which involved mass-genocides and dictatorship), If it was to occur- what would be the reasons at to why. Or be possible reasons? This is in relation towards the Killing Fields from Cambodia.
Answer:
Every day for four years, I would drive to my job, and every day at the same time, on the same route, I would notice the city bus. It would pull up next to me, and I would see all the people on board. Some would be reading. Some would be sleeping. Some would stare back at me. Every day, at the same time, it would follow me right to work. As I pulled into my parking space at work, I would see it around the corner, about a block away from my job. Then, one day, my car broke down. I had no way to get to work, and then, I remembered the bus. I decided to take it since I knew it was on the same schedule as I was. Since then, I have never driven to work again. Taking the bus is a useful method with which to travel because you can save a lot of money by using public transportation. One reason public transportation is useful is because it saves money. My commute to work was long, and it required a lot of gas. When I drove to work, I was spending $30 a week on gas. There are 52 weeks in a year. That translates to $1,560.00 a year I was spending on gas to get to work. When I started taking the bus, it cost $2 ($1 to get to work and another $1 to get home). Another way to save money is to use the toll road. That translates to $10 a week. That means that it cost me $520 a year to get to work. That's less than a third of what it cost to drive. It saved me $1,040.00. The funny part is that the reason my car broke down in the first place was because I was driving it constantly. 6 What is the central idea of this passage?
Explanation:
Every day for four years, I would drive to my job, and every day at the same time, on the same route, I would notice the city bus. It would pull up next to me, and I would see all the people on board. Some would be reading. Some would be sleeping. Some would stare back at me. Every day, at the same time, it would follow me right to work. As I pulled into my parking space at work, I would see it around the corner, about a block away from my job. Then, one day, my car broke down. I had no way to get to work, and then, I remembered the bus. I decided to take it since I knew it was on the same schedule as I was. Since then, I have never driven to work again. Taking the bus is a useful method with which to travel because you can save a lot of money by using public transportation. One reason public transportation is useful is because it saves money. My commute to work was long, and it required a lot of gas. When I drove to work, I was spending $30 a week on gas. There are 52 weeks in a year. That translates to $1,560.00 a year I was spending on gas to get to work. When I started taking the bus, it cost $2 ($1 to get to work and another $1 to get home). Another way to save money is to use the toll road. That translates to $10 a week. That means that it cost me $520 a year to get to work. That's less than a third of what it cost to drive. It saved me $1,040.00. The funny part is that the reason my car broke down in the first place was because I was driving it constantly. 6 What is the central idea of this passage?Every day for four years, I would drive to my job, and every day at the same time, on the same route, I would notice the city bus. It would pull up next to me, and I would see all the people on board. Some would be reading. Some would be sleeping. Some would stare back at me. Every day, at the same time, it would follow me right to work. As I pulled into my parking space at work, I would see it around the corner, about a block away from my job. Then, one day, my car broke down. I had no way to get to work, and then, I remembered the bus. I decided to take it since I knew it was on the same schedule as I was. Since then, I have never driven to work again. Taking the bus is a useful method with which to travel because you can save a lot of money by using public transportation. One reason public transportation is useful is because it saves money. My commute to work was long, and it required a lot of gas. When I drove to work, I was spending $30 a week on gas. There are 52 weeks in a year. That translates to $1,560.00 a year I was spending on gas to get to work. When I started taking the bus, it cost $2 ($1 to get to work and another $1 to get home). Another way to save money is to use the toll road. That translates to $10 a week. That means that it cost me $520 a year to get to work. That's less than a third of what it cost to drive. It saved me $1,040.00. The funny part is that the reason my car broke down in the first place was because I was driving it constantly. 6 What is the central idea of this passage?
Should the US have entered WWI? Why or why not?
Answer:
please give brainliest
Explanation:
yes because we didn't want to look like we could be pushed around
The Northwest Ordinance of 1789, which effectively created the Northwest Territory, banned slavery in this newly created territory of the United States
What was a major long-lasting effect of the Northwest Ordinance.
A) established the Ohio River as the permanent boundary between free and slave states that lasted until the Civil war
B) U.S. Supreme Court recognized the authority of the Northwest Ordinance to extend to all states as the states entered the Union
C) prohibition of slavery within the territory and establishing the Ohio River as the border between free and slave states in the territory
D) creation of slavery within the territory and establishing the Ohio River as the border between the free and slave states in the territory
Answer:
I think it is C) prohibition of slavery within the territory and establishing the Ohio River as the border between free and slave states in the territory
Explanation:
Answer:
C: Did test lol.
Explanation:
Which of the following statement best expresses a reason for European imperialism in the 1800s
Answer:
European nations wanted to control lands that had raw materials for industry and manufacturing.
Explanation:
The Europeans focus on expanding their market and crave for more raw materials which are cheaper compared to other countries.The Africa became dependent to European imperialism.
dfdsdfsdfresdfrdsafvdsfsdwswaswdasd
Answer:
Explanation:
985
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
yes
NGOs, which have worked to solve environmental, social, and health problems, are largely funded by
0
A. taxes
B. foreign governments.
0
C. the United Nations.
O
D. private individuals and organizations.
Answer:
c i think
Explanation:
I know this is a lot, but its worth a lot or points
Use Jack’s story in the Finding Freedom Interactive and The Memorial of Sundry of the Inhabitants of Botetourt County, 1781 to answer the following questions.
1. When and where does Jack’s story take place?
2. In what ways does Jack resist his status as an enslaved person? Provide at least 3 examples.
3. What were the risks and possible repercussions of Jack’s resistance?
4. How does the community in which Jack lives respond to Jack’s behavior? Does everybody in the community share the same opinion about Jack?
5. The Museum interprets Jack’s location on the western frontier of Virginia as impacting the ways he chose to resist his enslavement. Do you agree with this interpretation? Why or why not?
6. Why do you think Jack resisted his enslavement? What might he have had to gain, despite the risks?
Answer:
it says the question is not used on brainly
Explanation:
can you help me please
Answer:
Its the second one, you are correct
Explanation:
Describe two features of the attempts to colonise Virginia in the 1580s.
Answer:
The famous Sir Walter Raleigh was given permission by Queen Elizabeth the first to establish colonies in the Americas. Naming the land 'Virginia', after the virgin queen, the colony was set to challenge Spanish Imperial interests. However, the settlers had disputes with their indigenous neighbours, and the disappearance of many of the settlers of the second attempt is attributed to the conflict.
What kind of moral obligation (responsibility) do people have, if any, to fight injustice (unfairness) when they see it?
What is one difference between Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton
Answer:
Thomas Jefferson was a Democratic Republic and Alexzander was a Federalist
Explanation: Is this what you are looking for or more specific?
How did the outcome of the Spanish-American War change US foreign policy? *
1 point
It shifted US Policy towards neutrality.
It shifted US Policy towards imperialism.
It shifted US policy towards unilateralism.
It shifted US policy toward noncolonialism.
Answer:
Correct answer is It shifted US Policy towards imperialism.
Explanation:
Second option is the only correct as it marked the expansion of United States. United States decided to spread their influence outside American continent, which put them in the line of great imperial forces.
All other answers are therefore wrong, as they are not expressing the attitudes of the American government at the time.
Something that is left out or that does not fit the general pattern is a(n): protection immunity anticipation exception
Answer:
Exception
Explanation:
An exception is something that is left out
All social services organizations maintain a set of ethical standards for similar reasons, which include providing structured principles to
guide behavior, practice, and
O employee incentives
decision making
O policy-making
O conduct codes
Answer: policy-making
Helps me pls! Brainliest and 5 points!
Which examples represent social changes that occurred on the home front? Select two options.
using savings stamps
growing victory gardens
employing new technologies
creating propaganda posters
having anti-German feelings
Answer:
using savings stampsemploying new technologies
What group of clergy members belong in the black row
A- Archbishop
B- Monks
C- Parishes
D- Diocese
Answer:
diocese is the group that missing
Letter from Birmingham Jail Assignment
Answer the following questions after reading the letter.
1. Who is he writing the letter to?
2. Why is he responding to this particular criticism?
3. What reasons does he give for being in Birmingham? Which do you believe to be
the most important and why?
4. What does he feel clergyman should have criticized in Birmingham?
6. Explain the steps taken by local civil rights leaders to end the unfair treatment of African Americans in Birmingham prior to King’s arrival and demonstrations. What was the purpose of the demonstration?
7. Evaluate King’s arguments on “timing” in his experiences.
8. How does King differentiate between just and unjust laws? Provide examples.
9. What role does King feel white moderates have in the struggle for equal rights?
10. Why does King argue that demonstrators should be allowed to express themselves?
11. Why do you think King in particular has been disappointed with white religious leaders?
12. Paraphrase King’s feelings about the Birmingham police department’s treatment of African Americans.
Answer:
Considering the context of its creation, the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is remarkably restrained in tone. Throughout his career, many critics of Dr. King argued that he was too deferential to the white authorities that facilitated segregation and other racist policies, but the tone here seems to serve several purposes. First, it conforms to his ultimate purpose of justifying his cause as being in the name of justice. He does not wish to validate his audience’s deep-seeded fears - that the black movement is an extremist set that will engender violence. Therefore, by utilizing restraint, he earns a sympathetic ear to which he then declares his proud embrace of extremism and tension. His difficult arguments end up practically unimpeachable precisely because he has presented them through logos as well as through pathos. However, the restraint also allows him to reinforce one of the letter’s central themes, the interconnectedness of man. There are times when he distinguishes himself and his cause from that of his opponents, particularly in terms of race. However, he for the most part suggests that all men are responsible for all others, an idea that would not be as effective if the tone of the argument was too fiery and confrontational.
Explanation:
Considering it was written in a situation so infused with racial issues, the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is often strangely divorced from explicitly racial issues. Obviously, Dr. King cannot avoid the topic, but much of his argument, especially in the letter’s first half, is presented in universalist terms and through abstractions like “justice” and the interrelatedness of man. He argues that the clergymen, and his larger audience, should support his cause not because the victims are black but because it is the right thing to do. However, this passionate but restrained argument ultimately sets the stage for a declaration of what scholar Jonathan Rieder calls “a proclamation of black self-sufficiency” (94). Once he establishes the definitions of justice and morality, Dr. King argues that the black man will succeed with or without the help of white moderates because they operate with the just ideals of both secular America and divine guidance. Further, he implicitly suggests that by continuing to facilitate the oppression of the black man through moderation, his audience is operating in sin and will ultimately be on the losing side.
In Dr. King’s argument, moderation is a reflection of the moderate’s ignorant and unwitting sinfulness. In terms of the former, the white moderate operates under an illusion that patience will be more effective towards ending segregation than tension will be. Through a variety of legally-structured arguments, Dr. King illustrates the fallacy of both these assumptions. He argues that moderation is but a handy disguise for cowards who fear upsetting the status quo more than desire to pursue justice. However, because he stipulates that his audience is ostensibly interested in the virtue of justice, he argues that moderation allows them license to live in a sinfulness of inaction. To view the suffering of others but to remain silent facilitates a world where men are “separate,” which he equates with sinfulness. Through a variety of unambiguous comparisons – the just crusader to Jesus, and the moderates to those who did not protect the Jews of Nazi Germany – Dr. King decries moderation as the largest obstacle towards equal rights in America at the time.
One recurring idea that supports Dr. King’s arguments is that group mentality supports and enables immorality, and that the individual must therefore act for justice even when the group does not share that goal. He makes this point explicitly in the early part of the “Letter.” This argument supports his defense of civil disobedience, allows him to criticize the church for supporting the status quo rather than empowering crusaders for change, and supports the idea that law must reflect morality since it might otherwise be designed solely for the comfort of the majority. Overall, the discussion of group immorality supports his purpose of encouraging individual action in the face of injustice, and criticizing those who do not support such individual action for fear of upsetting the status quo.
The tone of the "Letter from Birmingham Prison" is astonishingly subdued when you consider the circumstances surrounding its creation. Many people criticized Dr. King throughout his career for being too submissive to white officials
Who wrote the letter from Birmingham jail?Dr. King's "Letter from Birmingham Jail" is a proclamation of black self-sufficiency. He argues that the clergymen and his audience should support his cause not because they are black, but because it is the right thing to do.
He also suggests that moderation is a reflection of the moderate's ignorant and unwitting sinfulness, and that patience is more effective than tension. Dr. King argues that moderation is the biggest obstacle towards equal rights in America, and that group mentality supports and enables immorality. This argument supports his defense of civil disobedience, criticism of the church for supporting the status quo, and criticism of those who do not support individual action for fear of upsetting the status quo.
Therefore, we can conclude that these were the points Mr. King included in his letter,
Learn more about Dr King's letter here?
https://brainly.com/question/28768925
#SPJ3
Which of the following landmarks can be found in San Antonio, Texas?
Answer:
The alamo.
Explanation:
What was the result of the Mexican-American War?
3. Which country was divided into European spheres of influence in the nineteenth century?
A. Japan
B. India
C. South Africa
D. China
Answer:
The answer is D, China was divided
Which crop saved James town by making money for the settlements investor
Answer: Tabacco
Explanation: No explanation lol
Answer:
Tobacco
Explanation:
Harvest tobacco
Who were the men who caused Jamestown to be successful? John Smith saved the colony from starvation. He told colonists that they must work in order to eat. John Rolfe had the colony plant and harvest tobacco, which became a cash crop and was sold to Europe.
Hope this helps! :D
Please please help me
Answer: b
Explanation:
hope its right good luck
A group of former indentured servants led by a wealthy frontier farmer began an uprising called _______________________________. A, Bacon breakfast, B, Bacon rebillion. C, Homestead act. D, Pullmans strike
A group of former indentured servants led by a wealthy frontier farmer began an uprising called Bacon rebillion
As Islam and Christianity spread through Africa, whích of the following were examples of
their imnpact? Select all that apply.
Answer:
i dont see the select but Christian concepts dominated the educational institutions of many african kingdoms
Calligraphy _________________
Calligraphy is a type of handwriting.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Dictators came to power in Europe and elsewhere even though most of the world was experiencing prosperous economic times and stable political conditions. T or F
Answer:
The statement is false.
Explanation:
Most of the dictators of modern history, contrary to what the statement says, do not usually take power in favorable economic contexts but, on the contrary, when there is a certain social unrest due to political, economic conflicts or a combination of both. Thus, for example, Hitler came to power after the hyperinflation suffered during the Weimar Republic and the economic crisis caused as a result of the First World War; and Mussolini did the same in Italy as a result of the discontent generated after the First World War, when Italy did not obtain the economic benefits that the other nations of the allied side did.