The theme of the passage relates to the theme from "Ode on a Grecian Urn" by supporting it. Contradicting it. Summarizing it. Illustrating it.

Answer:

b) A story that often tells a lesson and explains the creation of something

Explanation:

a

a true story of gods from long ago

Option B is the answer.

Look at the state of the gate. It needs repairing as soon as possible.

Answer:

to repair

Explanation:

D can also be right if we add to before the 'D' statement

Answer:

C consider

Explanation:

Answer:

OB

Explanation:

Answer:

In general, Deception is not acceptable in human studies. Occasionally, it is necessary to mislead the participants who are subjects of a study in order to obtain unbiased information. The Institute Review Board (IRB) must review very carefully the proposals that use deception or misrepresentation.

Answer:

B is the correct answer

Explanation:

squealer gives the animals a replacement song, written by Minimus the poet pig

Answer:

Struggle, struggle, struggle! We live in a time of conflict, external and internal. External conflict is a struggle between man and an outside force. Internal conflict is a struggle between man and self. Dealing with each conflict can be difficult, but there’s always a way to deal with it nonetheless. Dealing with internal conflict can be more difficult because you’re dealing with your own emotions and it can sometimes lead to depression. Don’t push away your thoughts if you are dealing. Pushing away your thoughts would make the situation more intense. Think about ways you can manage it instead of pushing the thoughts away. It can help if you write the conflict down or don’t let your mind fight itself. Dealing with external conflict is sometimes more simple. Effective listening is a way to deal with external conflict. It’s important to listen and understand the other person’s point of view. Effective listening doesn’t always work out which is why communication is key.

It’s important to clearly communicate your own feelings without putting the other person on the defensive.

The conflicts I have dealt with in my life are mostly internal. I try my best to keep my problems within myself so that the conflict I’m dealing with doesn’t become another person’s problem. I wouldn’t want an internal conflict to become an external conflict, so I manage my problems myself. Growing up, I’ve always found it difficult to choose between one choice and the other.

My most common line I’ve used is “It doesn’t matter”. I have always been scared of choosing one thing and having it become the wrong choice. Even up to now, I still use that line. I know it’s going to become a problem. Real soon, I would have to stop using that line and start making choices myself. The choices I have to choose from could be as little as which flavor of ice cream I want to as big as choosing when I want to start driving classes. I have to stop having other people choose for me and start choosing for myself because one day, it’s going to become an even bigger problem.

Other than that, if something personal were really hitting me hard, I would draw or read just to get through the problem. I would most likely read to escape reality because being in the book’s world is a place I would rather be in at that moment. I rarely deal with external conflict. When I do, I take it really hard because I haven’t dealt with much external conflict in my life. I try my best to be a good person and prevent myself into getting into situations with another person. If I were ever dealing with external conflict, it would most likely be a disagreement with another person. I’m that person who stands their ground. If I had an opinion or a chance to prove someone wrong, I would. It’s not about being right; it’s about preventing another person into believing something else when it’s wrong. Yes, everyone is entitled to his or her own opinion, but sometimes that opinion of something is not right.

I have a lot of patience, so I wouldn’t snap at someone right when there’s a disagreement. If someone were really getting on my nerves, I would stand my ground. I would say what I have to say then stop and walk away because sometimes, it’s just not worth it. One external conflict I always have to deal with is plain and simple, my brother. I have three older brothers, but one specific brother of mine is a complete nuisance. We fight on a daily basis and sometimes standing my ground isn’t even worth it. One night, we had a disagreement on school. My brother believes that school is a waste of time and being book smart is not as beneficial as having common sense. He says that being book smart isn’t going to get you anywhere in life and that common sense will make you more successful. I disagree with him completely because nowadays, you need an education to have a successful life.

I just want to prove to him that I’m not going to be a failure and striving to do my best is going to pay off. Everyone is going to have to encounter a conflict in his or her life. Nobody’s perfect and everyone’s different so there’s always going to be problems. Conflict isn’t a bad thing. The only kind of bad conflict is unresolved conflict. Getting through a conflict will make you stronger and you’ll be able to conquer life more successfully. Internal conflict is harder to deal with in my own opinion because with internal conflict, no one can help you but yourself. You can get help to deal with an internal conflict, but at the end of the day, it’s up to yourself to get through the problem.

Answer:

The answer is allusion

Explanation:

its the allusion of a “sleeping beauty“ there

Answer:

Gender is an example of a linguistic system of categorization that is inadequately connected. In many Indo-European languages, men' names denote their gender as "masculine," whereas female names indicate theirs.

It varies from language to language whether or not a difference is drawn between "animate" and "inanimate" entities. In this case, we are concerned with assigning meaning to new products. Even if the referent is abstract or inanimate, the implications of gender difference should presumably apply to all members of the masculine and feminine classes.

The answer choice which would be added to the introduction if you wanted to strengthen the idea that the audience can save money is:

According to the given question, we are asked to state the answer choice which would be added to the introduction if you wanted to strengthen the idea that the audience can save money.

As a result of this, we can see that from the complete text, there is the use of speech component headings which are used to show the introduction, main points, etc and if the narrator wants to strengthen the idea that the audience can save money, then he would make use of questions.

Therefore, the correct answer is option B

Read more about speech component here:

https://brainly.com/question/15096365

Answer:

it is C

Explanation:

Answer:

One thing that should be included in your conclusion is, you restate your thesis and give your finial thoughts on the central idea.

One thing that should not be included is a new idea or thought.

Answer:

i think u know wat to include

Explanation:

Six Things to AVOID in Your Conclusion

1: AVOID summarizing. ...

2: AVOID repeating your thesis or intro material verbatim. ...

3: AVOID bringing up minor points. ...

4: AVOID introducing new information. ...

5: AVOID selling yourself short. ...

6: AVOID the phrases “in summary” and “in conclusion.”

The main conflict in this sentence is:  "she picked up a leatherette case with lipstick in it"

The conflict in a literary work is the struggle between two forces. It is the problem that must be overcome before a resolution is reached.

In this sentence, picking up a case with lipstick in it is portrayed as abnormal. It represents a problem that must be sorted in the story.

Learn more about conflicts here:

https://brainly.com/question/24769299

Answer:

Sharply defined easy to perceive or understand

Answer:

OMG!!!! YOUR DOG IS SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO CUTE!!!!!!

Explanation:

A 10!!!

Answer:

for me its a 10 :)

nice dog btw!

It is not correct for your cousin to apply for both types of credit, as this could put her into debt.

We can arrive at this answer because:

About the need to buy a car, your cousin can buy a used and cheaper car, for as long as she doesn't have enough money to buy the car she wants.

More information:

https://brainly.com/question/25782019

Answer:

Every cloud has a silver lining

Explanation:

Good things come after bad things

Answer:

Every cloud has a silver lining

Explanation:

Good things come after bad things

"El Avión" is a Spanish word.

It means The Airplane.

Therefore, option A is correct.

El is an article in Spanish that is translated "The" in English.

The Helicopter in Spanish would translate El Helicóptero.

Both Avión and Aviation share the same Latin root word which is Avis.

Read more about the Airplane at the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/5546637

Answer:

Hello! And i would say Drugs most people start really early.

Explanation:

Hope dis helps!

Answer:

It is impossible not to be tainted by the evil of slavery.

Explanation:

It Is impossible to not be tainted by the evil of slavery.

The phrase that best describes the tone of this passage is "And, touching hers, make blessèd my rude hand. Did my heart love till now? Forswear it, sight".

The attitude you use when writing determines your tone. The tone of writing provides much more context than the words used, similar to the tone of voice. It can make an intention clear or hidden.

A written piece's tone reflects the author's perspective on a subject or target audience. It can be formal, casual, depressing, joyful, humorous, serious, etc. In general, it is communicated by the choice of certain words or the author's perspective on a particular topic.

The tone of this passage is one of wonder and awe. The speaker, Romeo, is marveling at the beauty of a woman and comparing her to various beautiful things. He seems to be struck by her beauty and is expressing his feelings in an elevated, poetic manner.

Learn more about tone on:

https://brainly.com/question/12176973

#SPJ1

Answer:

plates

Explanation:

The previous sentence mentions Rami going to the basement to get mugs and plates. This means "them" could refer to either mugs or plates. However, it makes the most sense for "them" to mean plates as this is what we eat food off of.

Therefore, plates is the correct answer choice.

Answer:

Fortunato is hesitant to follow Montresor into the vaults. Why do you think Poe included this detail? Fortunato follows Montresor down a long, winding staircase to the Montresor family catacombs. Fortunato then hesitates for a few minutes before entering into the vaults because the niter on the walls gives him a coughing fit.

Explanation:

The correct resposne is - Fortunato is apprehensive to enter the vaults after Montresor. What justifies Poe's inclusion of this information? Fortunato adheres to Montresor as he descends a steep, serpentine stairway to the family catacombs. The nighttime lighting on the walls causes Fortunato to cough, so he waits a few minutes before going into the vaults.

Our narrator, Montresor (assuming that's his true name), is Mr. Sinister. You don't want to run across him anyplace, not even in a subterranean cemetery. He is a cold-blooded, merciless murderer. In addition, to their like to murder, he also considers it vital.

He is narrating the tale fifty years after the event took place. This brings up a plethora of challenging issues. The major ones will be discussed under "Bragging of Confessing" but let's first look at some other facets of his personality.

Montresor is "a typical example of an unreliable narrator," according to any reviewer. And it's probably true that we shouldn't trust him if he can plaster Fortunato into a vault. We still can't believe him if he's lying and Fortunato wasn't killed by him.

To read more about Montresor, refer to - https://brainly.com/question/1285815

#SPJ2

Charges of media bias have been flying like a bloody banner on the campaign trail. Newt Gingrich excoriated the “elite media” in a richly applauded moment during one of the Republican debates. Rick Santorum chewed out a New York Times reporter. Mitt Romney said this month that he faces “an uphill battle” against the press in the general election.

Meanwhile, just about every new poll of public sentiment shows that confidence in the news media has hit a new low. Seventy-seven percent of those surveyed by the Pew Research Center in the fall said the media “tend to favor one side” compared with 53 percent who said so in 1985.

But have the media really become more biased? Or is this a case of perception trumping reality?

In fact, there’s little to suggest that over the past few decades news reporting has become more favorable to one party. That’s not to say researchers haven’t found bias in reporting. They have, but they don’t agree that one side is consistently favored or that this favoritism has been growing like a pernicious weed.  

Style

How biased are the media, really?

By Paul FarhiApril 27, 2012

Charges of media bias have been flying like a bloody banner on the campaign trail. Newt Gingrich excoriated the “elite media” in a richly applauded moment during one of the Republican debates. Rick Santorum chewed out a New York Times reporter. Mitt Romney said this month that he faces “an uphill battle” against the press in the general election.

Meanwhile, just about every new poll of public sentiment shows that confidence in the news media has hit a new low. Seventy-seven percent of those surveyed by the Pew Research Center in the fall said the media “tend to favor one side” compared with 53 percent who said so in 1985.

But have the media really become more biased? Or is this a case of perception trumping reality?

In fact, there’s little to suggest that over the past few decades news reporting has become more favorable to one party. That’s not to say researchers haven’t found bias in reporting. They have, but they don’t agree that one side is consistently favored or that this favoritism has been growing like a pernicious weed.

On the conservative side, the strongest case might have been made by Tim Groseclose, a political science and economics professor at the University of California at Los Angeles. Groseclose used a three-pronged test to quantify the “slant quotient” of news stories reported by dozens of media sources. He compared these ratings with a statistical analysis of the voting records of various national politicians. In his 2011 book, “Left Turn: How Liberal Bias Distorts the American Mind,” Groseclose concluded that most media organizations aligned with the views of liberal politicians. (Groseclose determined that The Washington Post’s “slant quotient” was less liberal than news coverage in the New York Times and Wall Street Journal.)

Even with conservative-leaning sources such as the Drudge Report and the Washington Times factored in, “the aggregate slant is leftward,” said Groseclose, who describes himself as a conservative.

But that’s not the end of the story. A “meta-analysis” of bias studies — that is, a study of studies — shows something different: When all is said and done, left-leaning reporting is balanced by reporting more favorable to conservatives. “The net effect is zero,” said David D’Alessio, a communications sciences professor at the University of Connecticut at Stamford.