• Reread the story and focus on details about the culture or setting.
• Learn more about the culture or setting of the story by doing research. Gather information from at least three electronic sources.
• For your search terms, use specific cultural or local details that you find in the story, as well as the name of the culture or setting. For example, if the setting is the Iditarod dogsled race in Alaska, search for “Iditarod” or “dogsled race” rather than just “Alaska.”
• Integrate information from your research smoothly to create a clear and cohesive text that readers will appreciate.
• Paraphrase, summarize or quote content from your sources.
• At the end of your assignment, include a list of the URLs of the websites from which you gathered information.
When you have finished, submit this document to your teacher for grading.

Answer:

Future robots

past just do the lord of the rings

Explanation:

Answer:

the expression means that you will keep an eye on your future think kindly about the past and live in the present

Explanation:

Answer:

Lines 65-75 Identify details in the paragraph of how Lincoln and Davis were similar. ... Davis believed in enslavement, he felt superior to blacks. On the other hand, Lincoln thought slavery was wrong. He thought slavery should not be spread, but abolished.

Answer:

1. Collide

2. possession

3. introduce

4. discuss

5. estimate

6.  instruct

7. estimation

8. possess

9. introduction

10. collision

Explanation:

Answer:

rhyme scheme.

Explanation:

The given lines are an example of rhyme scheme.

A rhyme scheme can be defined as the sound at the end of each verse in a poem. This is a repetitive sound that occurs at the end of each verse in a song or poem. There are various types of rhyme schemes in literature such as internal rhyme, slant rhyme, etc.

In the given lines, the end of each verse rhyme with each other, that is sky and high. Therefore, the correct answer is option A.

Answer: (sorry if this isn't good enough, I know so little of Greek and Roma old history)

Hercules, a roman and Greek god from roman mythology and past, Hercules a man that was and still is one of the most famous Greco-Roman legendary heroes. Son of Zeus, and a slayer of beats,

this man has dozen and more stories about him, to slaying the The Nemean lion. The Nemean lion was a vicious monster to the Greeks, slay and scarified to Zeus by The famous Hercules

and the well known story of the The Capture of Cerberus  

or known as the Three-headed dog, a short tempted mammal, All through He, Hercules, didn't slay such a beast, he returned the beast the king, Hera at his palace but turns out Zeus was there, and he grants Hercules immortality. He was very proud of his son, and Then was access to go the heavens.

but these characters Hercules, Athena, Helen of Troy, many beasts and etc. are all going around the character Zeus, his son, and these other godly beings

Answer:

the answer is and,so,yet, or

Answer:

if it were me i would say A

Explanation:

Answer:

The correct answer is A.

Explanation:

Answer:

dum

Explanation:

Answer:

c. Government oversight to uphold agreement and prevent unfair practices in farming industry and the workers employed in these sectors.

Explanation:

In his "Fi re side Ch ats", President R o os e v el t used the opportunity to address and discuss the numerous problems faced by the country. And in addressing the fears and concerns of the American people, he also used the platform to inform and re-assure them of the numerous works and solutions that his administration had done to get such problems solved.

In the given excerpt from his May 7 1933 address, President Roosevelt used the term "partnership" in describing the role of the government in taking control over "farming and industry and transportation". The use of this particular word is to show the agreement and oversight of the government in trying to prevent unfair practices in the farming industry and that the workers are given employment too. He stated that "[it is] not a partnership in profits, for the profits would still go to the citizens, but rather a partnership in planning and partnership to see that the plans are carried out."

Thus, the correct answer is option c.

Answer: C. Government oversight to uphold agreements and prevent unfair practices in farming, industry, and the workers employed in these sectors.

Explanation:

Answer:

One of my biggest fears.... are apple trees. It all started a few years back, when my house burnt down. The detectives said it was from a light sparking, but I knew better. I saw that look on the apple tree in my front yard. The apple tree had a suspicious look to him. Another time, I was walking in my front yard, and an apple fell on my head. Again, the apple tree had that same suspicious look. I looked for a new house, but every house had an apple tree! I couldn't stay in a world filled with apple trees. Who knew what they would do next! I had to move planets. I said goodbye to my family, and I started flying around the universe, looking for a planet without apple trees. But, as I was flying, the motor on my flying saucer stopped. I looked in the motor, and there was an apple stuck in it! It must have been the apple tree. My flying saucer began to fly out of control, and I crash landed onto Earth. That's how I ended up here.

Explanation:

Answer:

The birds and the trees

Explanation:

I knew the Earth was strange when I arrived here. Never in my 80 years had I found a planet as chaotic as this one. There were humans everywhere and they were all being watched. I arrived at a apple tree park and in it was full of birds.

The birds seemed different. I looked closer and found cameras in the bird's eye. Shocked as I was, I ran to warn a human, but suddenly I was tied up. The birds had caught me! I was dragged to one of the apple tree that turned into a secret tunnel.

The tunnel led me to the Area 51 base and here we are.

I'll get my Oscar now. :D

Answer:

It's 9

Explanation:

Answer:

haa

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

3 or 4 one

i read all summer in a day and those two make most sense to me

sorry if it wrong

Answer:

"They stood looking at the door"

Explanation:

If this is not correct I am sorry I have not read the book.

Answer:

Or is simply the word you use to give either a choice or to talk about two different things.

Explanation:

The first way to use "or"

"Hey, would you like to eat pizza OR tacos?"

A second way

"Ann said that she never took it. OR she could be lying to you so that she can keep it."

Does that make sense?

Answer:

She uses dialogue that is true to the time period.

Explanation:

To complete this exercise, you have to read the story "A friend in need" and then select the correct answer, which is "she uses dialogue that is true to the time period" because when she starts telling the story about this man that she met once, she says the dialogues in a way that you feel like you are there although it was years ago.

For example:

"Do you know Turner?" said Burton as I nodded a greeting.

"I've met him at the club. I'm told he's a remittance man."

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Answer: Yes and it should.

Explanation: If the elephants have no safe enviornment to inhabit, there is no point in protecting the elephants. The elephants need just as much protection as their enviornment.

Answer:

A the answer is a.

Explanation:

They are both in SD

Wind caves allows camping.

they are both national parks.

Badlands national park and wind cave are tourist attractions. The false statement is option D.

Badlands has more cliffs and wildflower when compared to wind cave. Badlands park also has a wide variety of wildflowers, which add to the beauty of the place. Wind cave does not have camping, while badlands has great options for camping overnight. Also, Badlands national park is a properly defined national park while wind cave is a national park unit.

The only false statement in the above question is that both are situated in different states. Both of these are situated in South Dakota.

Therefore, in the above question, the false statement is option D.

Learn more about national parks here:

https://brainly.com/question/32120992

#SPJ6

The correct question is:

How are Badlands National Park and Wind Cave different? Find the incorrect statement.

A. Badlands has more cliffs and wildflowers.

B. Wind Cave does not allow camping.

C. Only Badlands is a national park.

D. They are in different states.

Answer:

it might be A... try that

Explanation:

Answer:

1. Therefore, However and Then  

2. Refer to it, Paraphrase it, Summarize it, Use someone else's ideas

Explanation:

1. "Therefore", "However" and "Then" are words that indicate that you are finalizing a thought by concluding on all the facts, evidence and arguments addressed in relation to a given subject. These words should always be used in an essay or speech at the time the author's position is being finalized and a resolution is being applied.

2. You must cite the sources of research in an article whenever you use elements written by other authors or even mention those elements or the author. This prevents you from committing plagiarism and allows your work to be considered correct and legal. In summary, you should cite the sources whenever you refer to it, paraphrase it, summarize it or use someone else's ideas

Answer:

outsiders tend to be misjudged and misunderstood because of the way they dress, the things they take interest in, and the way they act, and is "different" from others.

Explanation:

hope this help and can i get brainlyest if possible

Answer:

lightweight fabric

Explanation: What is organdy made of?

A lightweight, sheer, stiff fabric, usually made of cotton, and used for collars, cuffs, aprons and on the inside of garments to stiffen them.

Answer:

A cotton fabric

Explanation:

the answer to your question is stressful

Answer:

Anne Frank is a story that shows how cruel a person can truly be. It shows the evil that was preformed by the Hitler was towards Jewish people, even a little girl like Anne was taught she was less than Germans because of her heritage. She knew and had to live with how awful other Jewish people, even people she knew, were treated. How they were killed and abused, though that may be an understatement. Though her story shows the of cruelty, it also shows how good and generous a person can be. Miep Gies put her own safety on the line to help protect not only the Frank family, but also the Van Pel family and Fritz Pfeffer. She kept them safe as best as she could for as long as she could. Even in a time where most people would turn their backs on people in need and only think about themselves. Not only that, but Anne and her famil remained good and loving people which seems almost impossible given the circumstances they were living in. On two very different sides of the spectrum, a person can be truly evil and vile. On the other end, a person can be good and loving and generous.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

Mayella Ewell lies on the witness stand out of fear for her father Bob Ewell and embarrassment over her attraction to Tom Robinson. She claims to the jury that Tom beat and assaulted her, but her father actually beat her after he caught her cuddling and kissing an African American.

The term "attraction" refers to an emotional, romantic, physical, or aesthetic interest, desire, or affinity. A lot of individuals think that attraction is only romantic. But many emotions—including being interested in someone, praising their attractiveness, and having sexual feelings—qualify as an attraction.

The majority of people are primarily impacted by someone's physical appearance before becoming more or less attracted to someone over time depending on other criteria, such as likeness, personality, and reciprocal interest.

She was aware of the horrendous treatment that other Jews, including individuals she knew, received and had to live with it. Though it might be an understatement, how they were murdered and mistreated. Her tale demonstrates harshness, but it also demonstrates the goodness and generosity of others.

Therefore, Ewell and embarrassed over her attraction to Tom Robinson.

Learn more about the attraction here:

https://brainly.com/question/497462

#SPJ2

Answer:  This is an example of an IDIOM

Answer: the first person?

I’m not 100% sure what the questions asking

Explanation:

Answer:B

Mark me brainliest if this helps,

Until the past decade, scientists, research institutions, and government agencies relied solely on a system of self-regulation based on shared ethical principles and generally accepted research practices to ensure integrity in the research process. Among the very basic principles that guide scientists, as well as many other scholars, are those expressed as respect for the integrity of knowledge, collegiality, honesty, objectivity, and openness. These principles are at work in the fundamental elements of the scientific method, such as formulating a hypothesis, designing an experiment to test the hypothesis, and collecting and interpreting data. In addition, more particular principles characteristic of specific scientific disciplines influence the methods of observation; the acquisition, storage, management, and sharing of data; the communication of scientific knowledge and information; and the training of younger scientists.1 How these principles are applied varies considerably among the several scientific disciplines, different research organizations, and individual investigators.

The basic and particular principles that guide scientific research practices exist primarily in an unwritten code of ethics. Although some have proposed that these principles should be written down and formalized,2 the principles and traditions of science are, for the most part, conveyed to successive generations of scientists through example, discussion, and informal education. As was pointed out in an early Academy report on responsible conduct of research in the Suggested Citation:"2 SCIENTIFIC PRINCIPLES AND RESEARCH PRACTICES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.×

Add a note to your bookmark

health sciences, “a variety of informal and formal practices and procedures currently exist in the academic research environment to assure and maintain the high quality of research conduct” (IOM, 1989a, p. 18).

Physicist Richard Feynman invoked the informal approach to communicating the basic principles of science in his 1974 commencement address at the California Institute of Technology (Feynman, 1985):

[There is an] idea that we all hope you have learned in studying science in school—we never explicitly say what this is, but just hope that you catch on by all the examples of scientific investigation. It's a kind of scientific integrity, a principle of scientific thought that corresponds to a kind of utter honesty—a kind of leaning over backwards. For example, if you're doing an experiment, you should report everything that you think might make it invalid—not only what you think is right about it; other causes that could possibly explain your results; and things you thought of that you've eliminated by some other experiment, and how they worked—to make sure the other fellow can tell they have been eliminated.

Details that could throw doubt on your interpretation must be given, if you know them. You must do the best you can—if you know anything at all wrong, or possibly wrong—to explain it. If you make a theory, for example, and advertise it, or put it out, then you must also put down all the facts that disagree with it, as well as those that agree with it. In summary, the idea is to try to give all the information to help others to judge the value of your contribution, not just the information that leads to judgment in one particular direction or another. (pp. 311-312)

Many scholars have noted the implicit nature and informal character of the processes that often guide scientific research practices and inference.3 Research in well-established fields of scientific knowledge, guided by commonly accepted theoretical paradigms and experimental methods, involves few disagreements about what is recognized as sound scientific evidence. Even in a revolutionary scientific field like molecular biology, students and trainees have learned the basic principles governing judgments made in such standardized procedures as cloning a new gene and determining its sequence.

In evaluating practices that guide research endeavors, it is important to consider the individual character of scientific fields. Research fields that yield highly replicable results, such as ordinary organic chemical structures, are quite different from fields such as cellular immunology, which are in a much earlier stage of development and accumulate much erroneous or uninterpretable material before the pieces fit together coherently. When a research field is too new or too fragmented to support consensual paradigms or established methods, different scientific practices can emerge

Answer:

Either A or B

Explanation:

Once a scientist has finished with their experiment, Other scientists usually repeat the experiment to see if it's correct, and usually talk about it and see, if it's wrong, what could be done to fix it.