Question 1 of 10
Which of the following is an internal function of a business's accounting
department?
O A. Coordinating accounts receivable
O B. Administering employee payroll
C. Coordinating accounts payable
OD. Managing credit and collections accounts

Answer:

B. Administering employee payroll

Explanation:

I took the test

Administering employee payroll is an internal function of a business's accounting department. Hence, option B is correct.

Keeping track of hours worked, determining compensation, and sending checks or direct deposits to employees' bank accounts are all part of the payroll process, which is the procedure for paying employees of a corporation.

Payroll is the process of compensating the employees for the work they perform. It involves calculating their pay, deducting taxes and employee benefit costs, and making money to them, typically via direct deposit. With payroll processing software, these processes can be automated by both small and large businesses.

Salary is the annual remuneration that each employee is contractually required to receive.

Thus, option B is correct.

For more details about employee payroll, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/28257212

#SPJ6

Is the historian, Arthur Schlesinger, the one who wrote about the powers in government, the SR. or Jr. ? I need to know this for an assignment I'm doing that doesn't say which he is.

What does grave injustice mean?​

Pls only put the answer nothing other than that

Does that solve you question

There were more than__________ people injured in alcohol-related crashes in Florida

William sued a reckless driver who collided with his car. He would likely be
awarded punitive damages in which of the following situations?
A. Plaintiffs with similar cases had been awarded punitive damages.
B. The plaintiff's damages did not reach the required minimum.
C. The driver did not show remorse or apologize.
D. The driver was uninsured and not paying attention.

Activity 1: The Takings Clause - Read the following excerpt from the Fifth Amendment and define the terms below IN YOUR OWN WORDS. Then, brainstorm ideas of things that could be considered “public use” (at least 3).

No person shall … be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

“due process of law”
“Taking”
eminent domain
“public use”
“just compensation”
Examples of things that could be considered “public use”





Activity 2: Read the excerpts below and summarize.

What Does the Fifth Amendment Guarantee?
“Among other things, the Fifth Amendment guarantees that people have the right to their lives, liberty, and property. The government is not allowed to take those things without a reason or without following due process. Due process means that the government must act fairly and obey
legal procedures when it tries to take property. The just compensation clause of the Fifth Amendment means the federal government must pay for any private property it takes for public use.”

Summarize: what does the Fifth Amendment guarantee?

What Is a Taking?
“Although the Constitution protects private property, the government can sometimes seize or restrict the use of that property. It can take property in the name of the public good. This is called a taking.”

Summarize: what is a taking?

What Is Eminent Domain?
“The Founders realized they must reconcile [consider both] the need to sometimes take property for government use and individuals’ rights to use their own property. Sometimes the government needs land to build a road, school, post office, or military base. Historically, most takings happened through eminent domain. Eminent domain refers to the government’s right to take private property for public use. In the 1800s, eminent domain was used to claim land for railroads. In the twentieth century, it was used to remove residents from land along planned interstate highway routes. Even in cases of eminent domain, the government must provide
just compensation.”

Summarize: what is eminent domain?

What Is Just Compensation?
“Individuals can sue the government to be reimbursed [paid back] for the lost value of their property. They are asking for just compensation. It is often difficult to determine the amount
of just compensation. Today, the Supreme Court generally uses the fair market value standard, defining just compensation as “what a willing buyer would pay in cash to a willing seller at the time of the taking.”

Summarize: what is just compensation?

Activity 3: Read the three scenarios on handout C and answer the questions as they relate to EACH scenario.



Is the situation described a “taking” of property?
In the situation described, can the government claim Eminent Domain?
If so, what would be the best way to determine just compensation?
Scenario 1






Scenario 2






Scenario 3







Activity 4: Read handout D and answer the questions below.

In which case did the government attempt to take physical property?
In which case did the Court rule that a “taking” had occurred, even though no land was actually taken?
In which case did the Supreme Court interpret “public use” as “public benefit? Is there a difference?
How does the Kelo ruling differ from the other property rulings? Why do you think it has been a very controversial decision?
Is redevelopment through eminent domain the only way to revitalize a neighborhood? Is it the best way? What other methods can you think of?

Due to the stiffer penalties imposed for
"possession with intent" offenses, many states
forbid the inference of intent to deliver merely
on the basis of:

A.possession of a controlled substance.

B.eyewitness testimony.

C. undercover officers' testimony.

D.possession of both a substance and
paraphernalia.