PLZ HELP
Which area on the map shows where Buddhism is widely practiced today?

Area A


Area B

Answer:

Well, the social policy is very communist while the economic policy is very socialist. They would address the same problems in many different ways such as a food shortage, the social policy would want to spread more welfare while the economic policy would want to spread more capitalism.

Explanation:

I am a college major in history it is fine if you copy and paste, I wrote this myself!!

Mark me brainliest!!!

Answer:

A reason a country would want to take another is because if they have no money they will go bankrupt, and with no money they're economic level will lower, which will cause economic problems,and lead them to yake over another country to take their goods and sell some property

Explanation:

Answer:

Because the country was rich in natural resources, like oil and coal.

Explanation:

Just look at those oil-rich countries like Qatar. Doesn't it seem like they're spoiled with the riches of fossil fuels? They are. If a country had the means to take over that without causing global discontent, then they would. The question is what will happen to those seemingly rich countries when their only source of income runs out, or people finally realize that it's a very environmentally unfriendly resource. Because when that happens, many a high and mighty country will become worth nothing to invade overnight.

Answer:

bc its a primal instinct to be greedy and want power and ppl r just horrible unless we learn to come together than we will fall

Answer:

Hudson river

Explanation:

Answer:

they have the same view of point

Answer:

Roman empire fell for many reasons, Invasions by Barbarian tribes, Economic troubles, and many more.

Explanation:

Invasions by Barbarian tribes -

Rome had tangled with Germanic tribes for hundreds of years, however by the 300s “barbarian” teams just like the Goths had encroached on the far side the Empire’s borders.

Economic Troubles -

Even as Rome was under fire from outside forces, it absolutely was conjointly crumbling from inside because of a severe money crisis. Constant wars and overspending had considerably lightened imperial coffers, and oppressive taxation and inflation had widened the gap between wealthy and poor.

Answer:

blah

Explanation:

Answer: i say Russia

Explanation:because of the fact that they have high  numbers of damage on that list

Answer:

Isaiah 53:4-6 (5)

Explanation: Essay

Jesus said the volume of the book is written of Me. He also, after He was raised from the dead, that evening, He met two men on the road to Emmaus. It was then that the bible tells us that, beginning with Moses and the prophets, He explained to them the things concerning Himself in all the scriptures, Lk 24:27. That excites me! So I have focused my attention on the Old Testament, to find Jesus on every page; and usually as you find Jesus, you also find out God's plan and how it relates to us, the Church.  So I read the first verse in Hosea chapter 6, and I agree that He has healed us and I agree that He has bandaged us, but what does it mean that He has torn us or that He has wounded us? This just didn’t sit right with me. I don’t believe that God beats us up or causes or allows bad things to happen to us to teach us a lesson. Our God is a righteous God. And I understand that there has to be a judgement for sin. Sin cannot go unpunished. This is why Jesus came and paid the price for our sin on the cross. All the judgement and wrath of our sin was placed upon Him, “the chastisement of our peace was upon Him”, Isaiah 53:5. So when I come across a scripture like Hosea 6:1, that alludes to God beating us up, I always take a deeper look and usually find that there is a treasure buried there; as is the case in this verse.  Now with Old Testament events and prophecy, you must always look at it in two ways; the present sense and the foreshadowing implications of the future sense. The events and prophecy of the entire Old Testament was put in place for the one goal- to reconcile man with God. This was the plan before the foundation of the world. Before God even created man, He knew man would sin and He knew He would have to send His Son to us to be the reconciliation for that sin. Everything in the Old Testament points toward Jesus and is His plan for the reconciliation of man with God.  Now, in Hosea 6, Hosea is prophesying over Israel, because Nebuchadnezzar is going to bring Israel into exile, that is the present, practical look at this verse, but I am convinced that everything God does, He does on purpose and can be related as a type or foreshadowing on something yet future. So when the text says He has torn us and He has wounded us it made me pause. If you look at the text in the Septuagint translation, you will find that the word “torn” is a present tense verb in the indicative mood. This means that it is something that happened in the past and continues to have effects up to and including the present time. This Greek word is harpazo, which is the same word for the rapture or the catching away of the saints. Also, when you look closely, you will find that the word “us” isn’t even in the original text. The translators added this, but it really isn’t there. So now this starts to take on a whole new meaning. It wasn’t Israel who was torn away but someone else. Now if you study the word “wounded” this is a future tense verb. The translators wrote this as “has wounded”, but it should have been written “will be wounded” and again the “us” doesn’t even exist. Now let’s read this with this new information.  “Come let us return to the Lord, for He has been snatched away, but He will heal us. He will be wounded and He will bandage us”.  This now makes perfect sense. Hosea is talking about Jesus! Because of man’s sin, God could no longer fellowship with man. Sin was creating a barrier and it was as if God was snatched away from man. But He will heal us. He did this on the cross. From Hosea’s point of view, the cross was still future. We, as Christians look back at the cross and believe it happened. Sin, now, no longer is a barrier between God and man. Jesus was wounded for our transgressions and bruised for our iniquities and because of this He has bandaged us. Repaired and healed us with the Father. Reconciliation between God and man is why Jesus came and died on the cross. Jesus came to heal us. So when Isaiah 53:5 says “by His stripes we were healed”, now I look at this as our reconciliation with the Father. Jesus healed me of my sin and now I can have a personal relationship with Him because the barrier of sin has been removed.  I also believe healing in a physical sense is still available today, but I don’t think physical healing was the main purpose of Isaiah 53 and Hosea 6. Reconciliation with the Father was the main purpose and physical healing is a type and foreshadowing of that healing.  There is absolutely nothing wrong with believing that Jesus has healed our physical bodies. In fact God wants us to be made whole without sickness and disease. Also, there is nothing wrong with believing God for financial stability and the comfort of this physical world. But we have to be careful not to make the healing of our physical bodies and the comfort of this world the ultimate prize. Jesus is the prize and our focus should never turn from Him.

Answer:

A. The king must stop imposing new taxes.

is answer

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Buying Stocks On The Margin

Answer: the increased consumer savings

Explanation: consumer items were causing people to use credit and ruined the stock because people couldnt pay back the credit

Answer:

American electoral politics has been dominated by two major political parties since shortly after the founding of the republic. Since the 1850s, they have been the Democratic Party and the Republican Party.

Explanation:

Answer:

4. A surge of national pride and confidence

Explanation:

One of the effects of the War of 1812 on the United States was that there was a feeling of great pride among the citizens and government for defeating such a large force.

This war was fought between America and her allies, the United Kingdom of Britain and Ireland and their colonies in Northern America and their allies.

Answer:

A surge of national pride and confidence and military hero’s who went on to become national leaders

Explanation:

I just did the test

Answer:

1. By signing treaties with the locals and formulating military and trading partnerships

2. Divide and Rule policy

Explanation:

British secure its hold on India, By signing an agreement with the locals and formulating military and trading partnerships.

This helped them penetrate India through ordinary trade, as these local leaders assist the British in painting their subjects along with the British policies.

2. Colonial policies that led to the beginning of Indian Nationalism is through the British divide and rule policies. This policy incites a different sense of nationalism or staying alone among major categories of people, particularly between Muslims and Hindus.

Britain secure its hold on India by the policies like subsidiary Alliance, Doctrine of lapse, and divide and rule. Colonial Policies led to poverty and backwardness of India which made the demand for freedom prevalent.

Britain secure its hold on India based on the policy of Subsidiary Alliance and Doctrine of Lapse. According to Former, the Regional power comes into alliance with the British against any external threat, while later suggest the subordination of the Regional power through the policy of Doctrine of lapse meaning the Regional Power has no heir to govern the state, hence it comes under british rule.

These policies along with divide and rule, made India poverty stricken, with no political, and economical rights, Indians became more angry. Hence, it leads to Indian Nationalism.

Learn More about British Raj here:

https://brainly.com/question/779907

Answer:

Explanation:

I think it is the belief that the earth rotated on an axis and that major advances in calculus

Answer:

C is the answer

Explanation:

Answer:

mlk was stabbed while autographing books what shape was his scar

Explanation:

This happened on the news.

Answer: thanked God he was still alive.

Explanation:

Answer:

B

Explanation:

No, because it is common knowledge.

Answer:

A Because people may know that milk helps you but they don't know I want ways that helps you

Answer: Compare & Contrast your welcome :3

Explanation:

Compare and contrast is the text structure that the author uses in "Bomb Craters.

When material is ejected from the surface of the ground by an explosive event at, immediately above, or below the surface, an explosion crater is created.

A crater created by an underground explosion, shown in stylized cross-section.

Through the displacement and ejection of ground material during an explosive event, craters are created. Usually, it is formed like a bowl. The three mechanisms that lead to the crater's formation are high-pressure gas, shock waves, and:

The ground has undergone plastic deformation. material (ejecta) that the explosion has thrown up from the ground. the ground's surface splintering. The crater partially fills back in as a result of two processes: Ejecta falling back. crater wall and lip landslides and erosion.

a comparison of the five processes' respective importance

Learn more about Explosion crater, from :

brainly.com/question/31063143

#SPJ2

Answer:

When the river Nile flooded, water, mud and silt from the river was washed up over the river banks creating a fertile growing area. During the period of the flood the Egyptian farmers spent time mending and making tools and looking after the animals. Many farmers also worked for the pharaoh during this time building pyramids and temples.

Explanation:

Answer:

Correct answer is C . the power to command the armed forces

Explanation:

A is not correct, as this is the power that lies in the hands of Congress.

B is not correct, as no one, including the president has this type of authority.

C is correct as one of the main powers that the president has is to command army during the conflict.

The Exodus (Hebrew: יציאת מצרים, Yeẓi’at Miẓrayim: lit. 'Departure from Egypt') is the founding myth of the Israelites. It tells of their departure from Egypt, the revelations at biblical Mount Sinai, and their wanderings in the wilderness up to the borders of Canaan. Its message is that the Israelites were delivered from slavery by Yahweh their god, and therefore belong to him by covenant.

The consensus of modern scholars is that the Bible does not give an accurate account of the origins of the Israelites, who appear instead to have formed as an entity in the central highlands of Canaan in the late second millennium BCE from the indigenous Canaanite culture. Most modern scholars believe that the story of the Exodus has some historical core, but the Bible was never intended primarily as a historical document, and contains little that is accurate or reliable.

The story of the Exodus is spread over four of the biblical books of the Torah or Pentateuch, namely Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. There is a widespread agreement that the composition of the Torah took place in the Middle Persian Period (5th century BCE), although some traditions behind it are older since allusions to the story are made by 8th-century BCE prophets such as Amos and Hosea.

The biblical Exodus is central in Judaism, with it being recounted daily in Jewish prayers and celebrated in festivals such as Passover. Early Christians saw the Exodus as a typological prefiguration of resurrection and salvation by Jesus. The story has also resonated with non-Jewish groups, such as the early American settlers fleeing persecution in Europe, and African Americans striving for freedom and civil rights.

Answer:

C. When the official falsely accuses a senator of breaking the law.

Explanation:

Answer:

picture to small

Explanation:

barely can see questions

Answer:

What is that?

Explanation:

Answer:

i fw it .

Explanation:

Answer:

Carnegie led the expansion of the American steel industry in the late 19th century and became one of the richest Americans in history.

Explanation: