Please help me if you know. Please give me an answer

Answer:

114cm

Step-by-step explanation:

When you're in a situation like this, you use ratios!

If the father's height is 5cm, and actually 185cm, the ratio of photo height and actual height is 1:57.

When we use this, the father is 57 times taller than him inside the photo, so since the daughter (in photo) is 2 cm, her height should be 2*57 cm.

2*57 = 114, which concludes to 114 cm.

:)

a) To find the probability that the mouse weighs less than 332 grams is calculated using the z-score formula which is: z= (x-μ)/σ where, x=332μ=409σ=24z= (332−409)/24z=−3.21

Hence, P (x < 332) = P (z < -3.21)

The probability that the mouse weighs less than 332 grams is approximately equal to 0.0007. Therefore, the answer is 0.0007 (rounded to four decimal places).

b) To find the probability that the mouse weighs more than 480 grams is calculated using the z-score formula which is: z= (x-μ)/σwhere,x=480μ=409σ=24z= (480−409)/24z=2.96

Hence, P (x > 480) = P (z > 2.96)

The probability that the mouse weighs more than 480 grams is approximately equal to 0.0015. Therefore, the answer is 0.0015 (rounded to four decimal places).

c) To find the probability that the mouse weighs between 332 and 480 grams is calculated using the z-score formula which is: P (332 < x < 480) = P (-3.21 < z < 2.96)

Hence, the probability that the mouse weighs between 332 and 480 grams is approximately equal to 0.9980. Therefore, the answer is 0.9980 (rounded to four decimal places).

d) The probability of a randomly chosen mouse weighing less than 332 grams is found to be P (x < 332) = 0.0007 which is less than 5%. Therefore, it is unlikely that a randomly chosen mouse would weigh less than 332 grams. Hence, the answer is "Yes, the likelihood is less than 5%".

e) To find the cutoff for the heaviest 6% of this type of mouse can be done by using the Z-table, that gives the z-score for any given probability. For the heaviest 6%, we need to find the z-score corresponding to a probability of 0.94 (100% - 6%). Hence, the Z-score for 0.94 probability is 1.55. Cutoff weight = μ + Z-score * σ= 409 + 1.55 * 24 = 447.2 ≈ 447 (rounded to the nearest whole gram). Therefore, the answer is 447 (rounded to the nearest whole gram).

To know more about probability refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/29660226

#SPJ11

Answer:

48

Step-by-step explanation:

60 students X 80%=48

20% is 12 students

40% is 24 students

60% is 36 students

so on and so forth.

Answer:

48.

Step-by-step explanation:

.80 x 60 = 48

The estimated simple linear regression equation is y = 46.2 + 589.2x, with a coefficient of determination (r^2) of 0.7523.

The coefficient of determination (r^2) measures the proportion of the total variation in the dependent variable (y) that can be explained by the independent variable (x) in a linear regression model. In this case, the coefficient of determination is 0.7523, indicating that approximately 75.23% of the variation in the dependent variable (y) can be explained by the independent variable (x) using the given regression equation. This means that the linear relationship between x and y accounts for 75.23% of the variability observed in y. The remaining 24.77% of the variation is attributed to other factors not included in the model. A higher value of r^2 indicates a stronger relationship between the variables.

To know more about the coefficient here: brainly.com/question/1594145 #SPJ11

We would need 337,500 pounds of sand to completely fill the cube with sides measuring 15 feet across if it were a perfect cube.

The volume of a cube is calculated by taking the length of one side and raising it to the power of 3. In this case, the cube has sides that measure 15 feet each, so the volume can be calculated as:

Volume of cube = (Length of one side)^3 = (15 feet)^3 = 3,375 cubic feet

To fill the cube with sand, we would need to add enough sand to completely fill this volume. The weight of the sand we need can be calculated using its density. The density of sand varies depending on the type of sand, but a common density for dry sand is around 100 pounds per cubic foot.

Therefore, the weight of sand needed to fill the cube would be:

Weight of sand = (Volume of cube) x (Density of sand) = 3,375 cubic feet x 100 pounds per cubic foot = 337,500 pounds

It is worth noting that the real cube sculpture at the University of Michigan is not a perfect cube and is not filled with sand.

For such more questions on cube

https://brainly.com/question/1972490

#SPJ8

Answer:

Need to add picture

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

you will need to wait 3 hours and 30 mins

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Hello There!!

Step-by-step explanation:

It is 3 hours and 30 minutes which is 210 minutes altogether.

hope this helps,have a great day!!

~Pinky~

Option C is correct: A one-unit increase in x1 will lead to a 0.5906 unit increase in y, when x2 is held constant. A one-unit increase in x2 will lead to a 0.498 unit increase in y, when x1 is held constant.

The estimated regression equation for a model involving two independent variables and 10 observations follows. Here SST = 6,724.125,

SSE = 507.75,

Sb1 = 0.0813, and

Sb2 = 0.0567.

ŷ = 29.1270 +0.5906x1 + 0.4980x2

Interpretation of Regression Coefficients:

Below are the explanations of the regression coefficients in the estimated regression equation:

1. The regression coefficient for x1 is 0.5906. A one-unit increase in x1 will lead to a 0.5906 unit increase in y, when x2 is held constant.

2. The regression coefficient for x2 is 0.4980. A one-unit increase in x2 will lead to a 0.498 unit increase in y, when x1 is held constant.

Therefore, Option C is correct: A one-unit increase in x1 will lead to a 0.5906 unit increase in y, when x2 is held constant. A one-unit increase in x2 will lead to a 0.498 unit increase in y, when x1 is held constant.

Learn more about Regression Coefficients here:

https://brainly.com/question/30437943

#SPJ11

The entry to record the payment of salaries and wages on July 2 is a debit to Salaries and Wages Payable and a credit to Cash.

1. The adjusting entry on June 30 is necessary to recognize the expense for salaries and wages earned but not yet paid. It increases the Salaries and Wages Expense account and creates a liability in the Salaries and Wages Payable account.

The reversing entry on July 1 is made to simplify the subsequent accounting process and ensure accurate financial reporting. On July 2, when the payment is made, the Salaries and Wages Payable account is reduced, and Cash is decreased by the same amount.

2. Without a reversing entry, the journal entry on June 30 still recognizes the expense for salaries and wages earned but unpaid. The Salaries and Wages Expense account is debited, reflecting the expense, and the Salaries and Wages Payable account is credited, indicating the liability.

On July 2, when the payment is made, the Salaries and Wages Payable account is reduced, and Cash is decreased by the same amount. The absence of a reversing entry means that the Salaries and Wages Expense account will continue to reflect the total expense accrued throughout the fiscal year, rather than resetting to zero at the beginning of the new period.

Learn more about debit here:

https://brainly.com/question/29608520

#SPJ11

If a translation of the figure above is plotted 7 units to the right and 2 units up, the (12,3) point A' will be located on the new figure.

The process of changing the location of the image on the coordinate system will be known as the translation. Here the image is translated as;

The given coordinate of the point is:- (7, 2)

Then it is represented by a change in the function graph, according to operations such as multiplication or sum/subtraction either in it’s range(involving values of y) or in it’s domain(involving values of x  because we  just count 7 units to the right and then 2 units up.

Hence If a translation of the figure above is plotted 7 units to the right and 2 units up, the (12,3) point A' will be located on the new figure.

To know more about translation follow

brainly.com/question/12861087

#SPJ1

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

No soil bag weighs A or B and D is too much unless she has many acres.

Answer  The guy Above  is right

Answer:

12.61 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

The distance of lighthouse B from lighthouse A, the distance from lighthouse A to the boat and the distance of lighthouse B from the boat all form a triangle. Since lighthouse B is west of lighthouse A, and at a distance of 9 miles form lighthouse A, light house A is at a bearing of North 90° East of lighthouse B. The distance from lighthouse A to the boat is 6 miles, and the bearing of the boat from lighthouse B is North 64° East.

So, the angle between the distance from lighthouse B to the boat and lighthouse B to lighthouse A is 90° - 64° = 26°

Since we have two sides and an angle, we use the sine rule

a/sinA = b/sinB where a = 6, A = 26°, b = 9, B = unknown

So, sinB = bsinA/a

= 9sin26/6

= 3(0.4384)/2

= 1.3151/2

= 0.6576

B = sin⁻¹(0.6576)

= 41.11°

≅ 41.1°

We now find the third angle in the triangle, C(the angle facing the distance from lighthouse B to the boat) from

26° + 41.1° + C = 180° (sum of angles in a triangle)

67.1° + C = 180°

C = 180° - 67.1° = 112.9°

Using the sine rule again to find the third side, c(the distance from lighthouse B to the boat), we have

a/sinA = c/sinC

c = asinC/sinA

= 6sin112.9°/sin26°

= 6(0.9212)/0.4384

= 5.5271/0.4384

= 12.61 miles

Answer:

hi

Step-by-step explanation:

Yes, there is evidence to suggest that the population mean life span in Hawaii is less than 77 years.

The hypothesis test in question aims to determine if there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the population mean life span in Hawaii is less than 77 years.

The null hypothesis (H₀) assumes that the mean life span is equal to 77 years, while the alternative hypothesis (H₁) suggests that the mean life span is less than 77 years.

To conduct the hypothesis test, a significance level (α) of 5% is chosen, which corresponds to a 95% confidence level.

Since the question asks whether the population mean is less than 77 years, this is a left-tailed test.

Using the given sample information, the test statistic can be calculated using the formula:

t = (x - µ) / (s / √n), where x is the sample mean (71.4), µ is the population mean (77), s is the sample standard deviation (20.65), and n is the sample size (20).

By plugging in the values, the test statistic is calculated to be t = (71.4 - 77) / (20.65 / √20) ≈ -1.64.

To determine whether the test statistic falls in the critical region, the critical value for a left-tailed test at α = 0.05 is obtained from the t-distribution table or calculator.

With 19 degrees of freedom, the critical value is approximately -1.73.

Since the test statistic (-1.64) is not less than the critical value (-1.73), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

This means that there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean life span in Hawaii is less than 77 years at a 5% level of significance.

Learn more about hypothesis test

brainly.com/question/17099835

#SPJ11

Answer:

An expression for this would be 3y as length * breadth is the area of a rectangle.

Answer:

The selection of the schools is done by random sampling, the remaining schools are considered as the control and stratified sampling for the selection of students for analysis is considered

Step-by-step explanation:

Based on the scenario, the following key highlights are presented:

This indicates that the selection of the schools is done by random sampling, the remaining schools are considered as the control and stratified sampling for the selection of students for analysis is considered.

Answer:

30 blue pins

Step-by-step explanation:

30% is the same as 30 out of 100, so this can be written in this fraction: [tex]\frac{30}{100}[/tex]

now, you should multiply this fraction by the total number of pins she ordered:

100 x [tex]\frac{30}{100}[/tex]

to solve this, you can simplify by dividing 100 by 100, this equals 1

30 times 1 is 30

there are 30 blue pins

Answer:

30 hair pins were blue

Step-by-step explanation:

100 x 0.3 =  30

Answer:

x = 35

m<PQR = 70

Step-by-step explanation:

This is an isoceles triangle so the base angles are the same and they all add up to 180 so:

2x + 2x + 40 = 180

4x + 40 = 180

4x = 140

x = 35

m<PQR:

2x

2(35)

70

Step-by-step explanation:

X=40/8

X=5 Answer

hope it helps

Answer:

X= 5

Step-by-step explanation:

NOTE: DIVIDE 8 IN BOTH SIDE

8X/8 = X

40/8 = 5

SO X = 5

Please mark as brainliest

Have a great day, be safe and healthy  

Thank u  

XD

Answer:

40 + 25 = 65

49 + 63 = 112

63 + 15 = 78

7×16 =112

26 × 3 =78

5×13=65

so the answer is

40 + 25 -------- 5 × 13

49 + 63 -------- 7 × 16

63 + 15 --------- 26 × 3

i hope this help you

Answer:

0.4c

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that :

Price of mp3 is reduced by 60%

Let initial price of mp3 = c

Discount on price = 60% = 0.6

Discounted price = initial price - discount on price

Discounted price = c - 0.6c

Discounted price = 0.4c

Answer:

1 1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

1 1/2 + 3 1/2 = 5

6 1/2 - 5 =1 1/2

Answer:

b = -8

Step-by-step explanation:

Attachment.....added.

Hope it helps :)

Using Ancient Egyptian multiplication, the values are obtained as: (a)  74 × 64 = 2724: (b)  129 × 413 = 35405: (c)  58 × 692 = 30456: (d)  4968 × 1234 = 6148172.

Ancient Egyptian multiplication, also known as Egyptian multiplication or the method of multiplication through doubling and halving, is a method used by ancient Egyptians to multiply two numbers.

It involves breaking down one of the numbers into a sum of powers of two and then adding the corresponding multiples of the other number. Here's how you can compute the given multiplications using ancient Egyptian multiplication:

(a) 74 × 64:

We start with the number 1 and keep doubling it until we reach a number greater than or equal to 74. We then create a column for each power of 2 that was used, and write the corresponding multiple of 64 in each column. Finally, we add the numbers in the columns corresponding to the powers of 2 that make up 74.

1  ×  64 =  64

2  ×  64 = 128

4  ×  64 = 256

8  ×  64 = 512

16 ×  64 = 1024

32 ×  64 = 2048

Adding the numbers corresponding to powers of 2 that make up 74:

64 + 0 + 0 + 512 + 0 + 2048 = 2724

Therefore, 74 × 64 = 2724.

(b) 129 × 413:

1  ×  413 =  413

2  ×  413 =  826

4  ×  413 = 1652

8  ×  413 = 3304

16 ×  413 = 6608

32 ×  413 = 13216

64 ×  413 = 26432

Adding the numbers corresponding to powers of 2 that make up 129:

413 + 0 + 1652 + 0 + 6608 + 0 + 26432 = 35405

Therefore, 129 × 413 = 35405.

(c) 58 × 692:

1  ×  692 =  692

2  ×  692 = 1384

4  ×  692 = 2768

8  ×  692 = 5536

16 ×  692 = 11072

32 ×  692 = 22144

Adding the numbers corresponding to powers of 2 that make up 58:

692 + 1384 + 0 + 5536 + 0 + 22144 = 30456

Therefore, 58 × 692 = 30456.

(d) 4968 × 1234:

1   ×  1234 =   1234

2   ×  1234 =   2468

4   ×  1234 =   4936

8   ×  1234 =   9868

16  ×  1234 =  19668

32  ×  1234 =  39468

64  ×  1234 =  78936

128 ×  1234 = 157872

256 ×  1234 = 315744

512 ×  1234 = 631488

1024 × 1234 = 1262976

Adding the numbers corresponding to powers of 2 that make up 4968:

1234 + 2468 + 4936 + 0 + 19668 + 39468 + 78936 + 157872 + 315744 + 0 + 1262976 = 6148172

Therefore, 4968 × 1234 = 6148172.

Using the ancient Egyptian multiplication method, we have computed the products for the given multiplications.

To learn more about multiplication method visit:

brainly.com/question/30339990

#SPJ11

The formula of the iteration function for Newton's method is given by g(x) = x - f(x) / f'(x).

The graph of g(x) and g'(x) shows convergence of Newton's method on [-1, 0] as a Fixed-Point Iteration technique. Applying Newton's method to find an approximation of the root of the equation x + e^(-0.812x) = 0 in [-1, 0], with an initial approximation of p0 = -1, gives an approximation of p_n = -0.567143. The standard output table for this method is: TLP_nP_n-1RE(P_nP_n-1) 0-1.00000000000.1559875219 1-0.4801700174-1.00000000000.4801700174 2-0.5889524214-0.4801700174 0.1087824049 3-0.5671941668-0.5889524214 0.0217582546 4-0.5671432850-0.5671941668 0.0000508818. The conclusion is that the Newton's method converges to a root of the equation x + e^(-0.812x) = 0 in [-1, 0] with a tolerance of 10^-5.

Know more about iteration here:

https://brainly.com/question/31377097

#SPJ11

Answer:

-53

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

a. ∆ABC ~ ∆A'B'C'

b. Enlargement

c. Scale factor = 4

Step-by-step explanation:

a. <A corresponds to <A'

<B corresponds to <B'

<C corresponds to <C',

Therefore, the similarity statement would be: ∆ABC ~ ∆A'B'C'

b. The image of the dilation is an enlargement of the original figure because the side lengths of ∆A'B'C are larger than the corresponding side lengths of ∆ABC.

c. Scale factor = the ratio of the corresponding sides

Thus:

Scale factor = A'B'/AB = B'C'/BC = A'C'/AC

Scale factor = 24/6 = 48/12 = 60/15 = 4

Scale factor = 4

Answer is : 9692

cxcvbnm