Identify the null and alternative hypotheses to test each of the following situations. Complete parts a through c. a) An article from a business journal looked at 1120 CEOs from global companies and found that 35% had MBAs. Has the percentage changed? Let p be the proportion of CEOs with an MBA. H0 : P ___
VS
HA : P ___
(Type integers or decimals. Do not round.)

Answer:

The answer for<A=55°,<B=35°

If you provide more information or context to the problem, I can try to provide a more specific solution.

In general, the coefficients of a power series are the coefficients of the terms in the expansion of the function in powers of x. For example, if we have the power series:

f(x) = c0 + c1x + c2x^2 + c3x^3 + c4x^4 + ...

then the coefficients c0, c1, c2, c3, and c4 are the constants that multiply the powers of x in the expansion.

Similarly, the radius of convergence R is a property of a power series that determines the interval of values of x for which the series converges. The radius of convergence can be found using the ratio test or the root test, which are convergence tests for series. The ratio test involves taking the limit of the absolute value of the ratio of consecutive terms in the series, while the root test involves taking the limit of the nth root of the absolute value of the nth term of the series. The radius of convergence is equal to the reciprocal of the limit of the ratio or root test as n approaches infinity.

If you provide more information or context to the problem, I can try to provide a more specific solution.

To learn more about coefficients  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28975079

#SPJ11

The answer is A. It is the product of the initial population and the growth factor after h hours.

It is the ratio between the number of individuals added to a population in a given time interval and the number of individuals already present in the population.

This expression is a representation of the population of amoebas after h hours given the initial population size of 1,000 and a growth rate of 30% per hour.

This is calculated by multiplying the initial population size (1,000) by the growth factor (1 + 0.3) for each hour.

This equation can be represented by 1,000(1 + 0.3)h.

The growth factor (1 + 0.3) can be thought of as the increase in the size of the population each hour. Multiplying the initial population size (1,000) by the growth factor (1 + 0.3) for each hour gives us the population size after h hours. This is the product of the initial population and the growth factor after h hours, which is why option A is the correct answer.

For more questions related to growth factor

https://brainly.com/question/31437452

#SPJ1

Question:

Osama starts with a population of 1,000 amoebas that increases 30% in size every hour for a number of hours, h. The expression 1,000(1 + 0. 3)

I find the number of amoebas after h hours.

Which statement about this expression is true?

A. It is the product of the initial population and the growth factor after h hours.

B. It is the sum of the initial population and the percent increase.

C. It is the initial population raised to the growth factor after h hours.

D. It is the sum of the initial population and the growth factor after h hours.

The exact angular velocity in radians per unit time is approximately 2.41 radians/sec.

The angular velocity (ω) is defined as the change in the angle (θ) per unit time (t). In this case, we are given θ in degrees and t in seconds, so we need to convert θ to radians and then use the formula:

ω = Δθ / Δt

To convert θ from degrees to radians, we multiply by π/180:

θ = 690° × π/180 ≈ 12.05 radians

Now we can plug in the given values to find the angular velocity:

ω = Δθ / Δt = 12.05 radians / 5 sec ≈ 2.41 radians/sec

Therefore, the exact angular velocity in radians per unit time is approximately 2.41 radians/sec.

To learn more about angular visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14769426

#SPJ11

The probability is approximately 0.4313, or 43.13%.

Assuming that there are 365 days in a year (ignoring leap years), the probability that no two people out of a group of 25 have the same birthday can be found as follows:

First, consider the probability that the first person has a unique birthday, i.e., not the same as any of the previous birthdays. The probability of this happening is 365/365, since there are no previous birthdays to match.

Next, consider the probability that the second person has a unique birthday, given that the first person has a unique birthday. The probability of this happening is 364/365, since there are 364 remaining days for the second person to choose from, out of 365 total days.

Similarly, the probability that the third person has a unique birthday, given that the first two people have unique birthdays, is 363/365, since there are 363 remaining days to choose from out of 365 total days.

We can continue this process for all 25 people. Therefore, the probability that no two people out of a group of 25 have the same birthday can be calculated as:

P(no two people have the same birthday)=[tex]\frac{365}{365}[/tex] [tex]* \frac{364}{365} * \frac{363}{365} *.........* \frac{341}{365}[/tex]

This product can be calculated using a calculator or a spreadsheet. The result is approximately 0.4313, or 43.13%.

Therefore, the probability that no two people out of a group of 25 have the same birthday is approximately 0.4313, or 43.13%.

Learn more about probability

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The variable that is the explanatory or predictor variable is advertising expenditure since the organisation wants to forecast income from advertising spend. Option D is correct.

The company wants to understand the relationship between their spending on internet-based advertising and their revenue. To do this, they need to determine which variable is the explanatory (or predictor) variable and which variable is the response (or outcome) variable. The explanatory variable is the variable that is thought to have an effect on the response variable.

In this case, the company wants to predict their revenue based on their spending on advertising, so the amount spent on advertising is the explanatory variable. The response variable is the variable that is being measured or observed, which in this case is the revenue generated by the company. By analyzing the relationship between these two variables, the company can make informed decisions about how much to spend on advertising to maximize their revenue. Option D is correct.

To know more about the Advertising, here

https://brainly.com/question/16866160

#SPJ4

Answer:

35.17yd

Formula used = 2*pie+r

The formula for the nth term of the arithmetic sequence is:

aₙ = 91 + 3(n - 1)

Here are the steps to find the formula using the given information a₃ = 97 and a₆ = 106:

Step 1: Identify the common difference (d)
Since it's an arithmetic sequence, the difference between consecutive terms is constant. So, we can find the common difference (d) by subtracting a₃ from a₆ and dividing by the difference in their positions (6 - 3):

d = (a₆ - a₃) / (6 - 3)
d = (106 - 97) / 3
d = 9 / 3
d = 3

Step 2: Find the first term (a₁)
Now that we have the common difference (d), we can find the first term (a₁) by working backwards from a₃ using the formula:

aₙ = a₁ + (n - 1)d

Plugging in the values for a₃ and d, we have:

97 = a₁ + (3 - 1) * 3
97 = a₁ + 6

Subtract 6 from both sides:

a₁ = 91

Step 3: Write the formula for the nth term (aₙ)
Now that we have the first term (a₁) and the common difference (d), we can write the formula for the nth term of the arithmetic sequence:

aₙ = a₁ + (n - 1)d
aₙ = 91 + (n - 1) * 3

So, The formula for the nth term of the arithmetic sequence is:

aₙ = 91 + 3(n - 1)

To know more about arithmetic sequence, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/15412619

#SPJ11

So, the Wronskian of the given pair of functions [tex]e^2^t[/tex] and [tex]e^\frac{-3t}{2}[/tex] is -3.5[tex]e^\frac{t}{2}[/tex] .

To find the Wronskian of the given pair of functions, 1. [tex]e^2^t[/tex] and [tex]e^\frac{-3t}{2}[/tex], you can follow these steps:

Step 1: Write the given functions as y1(t) and y2(t):
y1(t) = [tex]e^2^t[/tex]
y2(t) =  [tex]e^\frac{-3t}{2}[/tex]

Step 2: Calculate the derivatives of the functions:
y1'(t) = 2 [tex]e^2^t[/tex]
y2'(t) = (-3/2) [tex]e^\frac{-3t}{2}[/tex]

Step 3: Calculate the Wronskian using the determinant formula:
W(y1, y2) = | y1(t)  y2(t)  |
                  | y1'(t) y2'(t)|

W(y1, y2) = | [tex]e^2^t[/tex]       [tex]e^\frac{-3t}{2}[/tex]   |
                  | 2 [tex]e^2^t[/tex]  (-3/2) [tex]e^\frac{-3t}{2}[/tex] |

Step 4: Evaluate the determinant:
W(y1, y2) = [tex]e^2^t[/tex]  * (-3/2) [tex]e^\frac{-3t}{2}[/tex]  -  [tex]e^\frac{-3t}{2}[/tex]  * 2 [tex]e^2^t[/tex]

Step 5: Simplify the expression:
W(y1, y2) = (-3/2) [tex]e^\frac{t}{2}[/tex]  - 2 [tex]e^\frac{t}{2}[/tex]
W(y1, y2) = -3.5 [tex]e^\frac{t}{2}[/tex]

To know more about derivatives click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/25324584#

#SPJ11

If A be a 5 × 4 matrix and let b and c be two vectors in [tex]R^5[/tex] and we are told that Ax = b is inconsistent, then the number of solutions for A * x = c could be unique, infinite, or none, based on the given information.

Since A is a 5x4 matrix and b and c are vectors in [tex]R^5[/tex], we know that A * x = b and A * x = c are systems of linear equations with x being a 4x1 vector.
We are given that A * x = b is inconsistent, which means it has no solutions. Now, let's analyze the system A * x = c.
1. If A * x = c has a unique solution, it would mean that there is a vector x for which the system A * x = b is inconsistent but A * x = c is consistent. This is possible.
2. If A * x = c has infinitely many solutions, it would mean that the system A * x = c has a free variable and there are infinitely many combinations of x that satisfy the equation. This is also possible.
3. If A * x = c has no solution (inconsistent), then both systems A * x = b and A * x = c would be inconsistent, which is also possible.
Therefore, the number of solutions for A * x = c could be unique, infinite, or none, based on the given information.

To learn more about matrix, refer:-

https://brainly.com/question/29132693

#SPJ11

Answer:

i think it’s about 6.17% but I’m not really sure

Step-by-step explanation:

you can round it to 6% too

if that’s not right, then i don't know sorry

Rounded to the nearest square inch, the area of triangle EFG is 651 in².

A triangle is a polygon with three sides and three angles. It is a simple closed figure that has three straight sides and three vertices. The sum of the angles in a triangle is always 180 degrees. Triangles can be classified based on their sides and angles. Triangles with all sides and angles equal are called equilateral triangles, triangles with two sides and two angles equal are called isosceles triangles, and triangles with no sides and no angles equal are called scalene triangles. Triangles can also be classified based on their angles, such as acute triangles (all angles less than 90 degrees), right triangles (one angle equal to 90 degrees), and obtuse triangles (one angle greater than 90 degrees). Triangles are important in mathematics, physics, and engineering, and are commonly used in construction and design.

To find the area of triangle EFG, we need to use the formula:

Area = 1/2 * base * height

where the base and height are perpendicular to each other.

Since we know the length of side EF (which is the base), we can use the Pythagorean theorem to find the height of the triangle. The Pythagorean theorem states that:

c² = a² + b²

where c is the length of the hypotenuse (in this case, EG), and a and b are the lengths of the other two sides (in this case, EF and FG).

So, we have:

EG² = EF² + FG²

52² = 30² + FG²

FG² = 52² - 30²

FG ≈ 43.27 in (rounded to the nearest hundredth)

Now that we know the base (EF) and the height (perpendicular to EF), we can calculate the area:

Area = 1/2 * EF * height

Area = 1/2 * 30 in * 43.27 in

Area ≈ 650.55 in²

Rounded to the nearest square inch, the area of triangle EFG is 651 in².

To know more about area visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29183952

#SPJ9

To answer your question, it is possible to make a process more capable by doing all of the following things EXCEPT:
B. Making the specification limits wider

While ensuring that the process is centered (A) and ensuring the process is in control (C) contribute to improved process capability, making the specification limits wider (B) does not inherently make the process more capable, as it might lead to reduced quality and increased variability.

Process capability is a measure of how well a process can consistently produce output that meets the specification limits. It is influenced by various factors, including the centering of the process (A), the stability and control of the process (C), and the variability of the process output.

Centering the process (A) involves aligning the process mean or target value with the midpoint of the specification limits. This helps to minimize the potential for producing output that falls outside the specification limits, thereby improving process capability.

Ensuring the process is in control (C) means that the process is stable and predictable, with common causes of variation being identified and addressed. This helps to reduce variability in the process output, which in turn improves process capability.

On the other hand, widening the specification limits (B) without addressing the underlying causes of process variability does not inherently make the process more capable. In fact, it can lead to reduced quality and increased variability, as it allows for a larger range of output to be considered acceptable, even if it falls further from the ideal target value. This can result in increased defects and non-conforming output, negatively impacting process capability.

To learn more about limits, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/8533149

#SPJ11

To answer your question, it is possible to make a process more capable by doing all of the following things EXCEPT:
B. Making the specification limits wider

While ensuring that the process is centered (A) and ensuring the process is in control (C) contribute to improved process capability, making the specification limits wider (B) does not inherently make the process more capable, as it might lead to reduced quality and increased variability.

Process capability is a measure of how well a process can consistently produce output that meets the specification limits. It is influenced by various factors, including the centering of the process (A), the stability and control of the process (C), and the variability of the process output.

Centering the process (A) involves aligning the process mean or target value with the midpoint of the specification limits. This helps to minimize the potential for producing output that falls outside the specification limits, thereby improving process capability.

Ensuring the process is in control (C) means that the process is stable and predictable, with common causes of variation being identified and addressed. This helps to reduce variability in the process output, which in turn improves process capability.

On the other hand, widening the specification limits (B) without addressing the underlying causes of process variability does not inherently make the process more capable. In fact, it can lead to reduced quality and increased variability, as it allows for a larger range of output to be considered acceptable, even if it falls further from the ideal target value. This can result in increased defects and non-conforming output, negatively impacting process capability.

To learn more about limits, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/8533149

#SPJ11

Total number of three-digit numbers = 6 + 5 + 5 + 5 = 21 numbers.

There are a total of 4 scenarios for forming three-digit numbers containing the digits 2 and 5, but none of the digits 0, 3, 7:

1. Numbers starting with 2 and having 5 in the middle (2_5): There are 6 possible choices for the last digit (1, 4, 6, 8, or 9), resulting in 6 numbers.

2. Numbers starting with 2 and having 5 as the last digit (2_5): There are 5 possible choices for the middle digit (1, 4, 6, 8, or 9), resulting in 5 numbers.

3. Numbers starting with 5 and having 2 in the middle (5_2): There are 5 possible choices for the last digit (1, 4, 6, 8, or 9), resulting in 5 numbers.

4. Numbers starting with 5 and having 2 as the last digit (5_2): There are 5 possible choices for the middle digit (1, 4, 6, 8, or 9), resulting in 5 numbers.

Know more about numbers here:

https://brainly.com/question/17429689

#SPJ11

The perimeter of the island is 28 miles. To find the perimeter of the island, we need to add up the lengths of all four sides.

Perimeter is a term used in geometry to refer to the total length of the boundary of a two-dimensional shape. It is measured in units of length, such as meters or feet.

Similarly, the perimeter of a rectangle is the sum of the lengths of all four sides, with opposite sides being equal in length.

P = 2(l + w)

where P is the perimeter, l is the length, and w is the width.

P = 4s.

In general, the perimeter of any polygon can be found by adding up the lengths of all its sides.

The island is 4 miles wide and 10 miles long, so its perimeter would be:

P = 2(4) + 2(10)

P = 8 + 20

P = 28

Therefore, the perimeter of the island is 28 miles.

To learn more about perimeter visit:

https://brainly.com/question/6465134

#SPJ4

The interest factor being referred to in the given table appears to be a compound interest factor.

The table contains a list of values corresponding to different time periods (end of year 6, 2, 3, 4, and 5) and their respective numerical values (1.06000, 1.12360, 1.19102, 1.26248, and 1.33823). These values represent the factor by which an initial amount would be multiplied in order to calculate the compound interest at the end of each time period. Compound interest refers to the interest that is calculated not only on the initial principal amount, but also on the accumulated interest from previous periods. Therefore, the table is showing the compound interest factor for different time periods.

The interest factors in the table are increasing, which means that the interest is compounding and accumulating over time. This suggests that the interest is being calculated based on a compound interest formula, such as the formula A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt), where A represents the final amount, P represents the principal amount, r represents the annual interest rate, n represents the number of times interest is compounded per year, and t represents the number of years. The values in the table are the result of applying this formula to different time periods with varying interest rates and compounding frequencies.

Therefore, based on the values and their increasing trend in the table, it can be concluded that the interest factor being referred to is a compound interest factor

Therefore, this table is related to compound interest.

To learn more about compound interest here:

brainly.com/question/29335425#

#SPJ11

Answer:

α ≈ 28.96°

Step-by-step explanation:

using the tangent ratio in the right triangle

tanα = [tex]\frac{opposite}{adjacent}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{\sqrt{15} }{7}[/tex] , then

α = [tex]tan^{-1}[/tex] ( [tex]\frac{\sqrt{15} }{7}[/tex] ) ≈ 28.96° ( to the nearest hundredth )

Dimensions of the corral with maximum area are;

x = 200 ft
y = 100 ft

We'll use the given terms and solve for x and y.

1. Write the equation for the perimeter of the corral.
The corral has three sides of the rectangle (2x + y) and half the circumference of the semicircle (0.5 × π ×  y). The total fencing is 600 ft.
Equation: 2x + y + 0.5 × π ×y = 600

2. Solve for y in terms of x.
y(1 + 0.5 × π) = 600 - 2x
y = (600 - 2x) / (1 + 0.5 × π)

3. Write the equation for the area of the corral.
The corral's area is the sum of the rectangle area (x × y) and the semicircle area (0.5 × π × (y/2)²).
Equation: A(x) = x × y + 0.5 × π × (y/2)²

4. Substitute y in the area equation.
A(x) = x × [(600 - 2x) / (1 + 0.5 × π)] + 0.5 × π × ([(600 - 2x) / (1 + 0.5 × π)]/2)²

5. Find the derivative of the area equation with respect to x.
A'(x) = dA/dx

6. Set the derivative equal to zero and solve for x.
A'(x) = 0

7. Calculate the corresponding y value using the equation in step 2.

After performing the above calculations, you'll find the dimensions of the corral with maximum area:

x = 200 ft
y = 100 ft

Learn more about maximum area.

brainly.com/question/11906003

#SPJ11

Domain = (-∞, -6]

Range = [2, ∞)

Domain = [-6, 1]

Range = [2, 3]

Domain = [1, ∞]

Range = [3, ∞]

We have,

The domain on the graph is the x-values and the range is the y-values corresponding to the x-values.

The graph of the function has three parts:

x - values:

1)

-∞ to x = -6

2)

x = -6 to x = 1

3)

x = 1 to ∞

y - values:

1)

y = 2 to ∞

2)

y = 2 to y = 3

3)

y = 3 to ∞

Now,

The domain is the x-values.

The range is the y-values.

Now,

Each part can be considered as having different functions.

So,

Domain = (-∞, -6]

Range = [2, ∞)

Domain = [-6, 1]

Range = [2, 3]

Domain = [1, ∞]

Range = [3, ∞]

Thus,

Domain = (-∞, -6]

Range = [2, ∞)

Domain = [-6, 1]

Range = [2, 3]

Domain = [1, ∞]

Range = [3, ∞]

Learn more about functions here:

https://brainly.com/question/28533782

#SPJ1

Sum of the cubes from k = 99 to k = 200 is 380,480,499.

You can use the formula for the sum of cubes of the first n natural numbers:

∑k³ = (n(n+1)/2)²

First, we need to find the sum of the cubes from 1 to 200:

n = 200
∑k³ = (200(200+1)/2)²
∑k³ = (200(201)/2)²
∑k³ = (20100)²
∑k³ = 404010000

Next, we find the sum of cubes from 1 to 98 (we subtract one as we want to start from 99):

n = 98
∑k³ = (98(98+1)/2)²
∑k³ = (98(99)/2)²
∑k³ = (4851)²
∑k³ = 23529501

Now, subtract the sum of cubes from 1 to 98 from the sum of cubes from 1 to 200:

∑²⁰⁰_k=99 k³ = 404010000 - 23529501
∑²⁰⁰_k=99 k³ = 380480499

So, the sum of the cubes from k = 99 to k = 200 is 380,480,499.

Learn more about Sum of the cubes.

brainly.com/question/21590574

#SPJ11

The function y = -4x² + 5x^(1/3) is both increasing and concave down on the interval ((5/24)^(3/5), ∞).

Interval notation: ((5/24)^(3/5), ∞)

To find the intervals where the function y = -4x² + 5x^(1/3) is both increasing and concave down, we need to take the first and second derivatives of the function.

First derivative:
y' = -8x + (5/3)x^(-2/3)

To find the critical points, we set y' = 0 and solve for x:
0 = -8x + (5/3)x^(-2/3)
8x = (5/3)x^(-2/3)
x = (5/24)^(3/5)

This critical point divides the x-axis into two intervals: (-∞, (5/24)^(3/5)) and ((5/24)^(3/5), ∞).

Second derivative:
y'' = -8x^(-4/3)

To determine concavity, we need to find where y'' is negative:
-8x^(-4/3) < 0
x^(-4/3) > 0
x > 0

So the function is concave down for all x > 0.

Therefore, the function y = -4x² + 5x^(1/3) is both increasing and concave down on the interval ((5/24)^(3/5), ∞).

Interval notation: ((5/24)^(3/5), ∞)

To learn more about function here:

brainly.com/question/13320130#

#SPJ11

The second x distribution based on samples of size n=81 has a greater probability of P(6 < x < 10) than the first x distribution based on samples of size n=49 due to its wider z-score interval.

Assuming that both samples are taken from the same population with mean μ = 8, we can use the central limit theorem to approximate the sampling distribution of the sample mean for each sample size.

The central limit theorem states that the sampling distribution of the sample mean approaches a normal distribution with mean μ and standard deviation σ/sqrt(n), where σ is the population standard deviation (which we don't know, so we'll assume it's unknown) and n is the sample size.

Since we don't know σ, we can use the sample standard deviation s as an estimate of σ, and the standard error of the mean is then s/sqrt(n).

For the sample of size n=49, we have

Mean: μ = 8

Standard deviation: s/sqrt(n) = unknown/sqrt(49) = unknown/7

Standard error of the mean: s/sqrt(n) = unknown/7

For the sample of size n=81, we have

Mean: μ = 8

Standard deviation: s/sqrt(n) = unknown/sqrt(81) = unknown/9

Standard error of the mean: s/sqrt(n) = unknown/9

To determine which distribution has a greater probability of x being between 6 and 10, we need to calculate the z-scores for these values for each sampling distribution.

For the sample of size n=49

z-score for x=6: (6 - 8) / (unknown/7) = -14unknown/7

z-score for x=10: (10 - 8) / (unknown/7) = 14unknown/7

For the sample of size n=81:

z-score for x=6: (6 - 8) / (unknown/9) = -18unknown/9

z-score for x=10: (10 - 8) / (unknown/9) = 18unknown/9

We want to compare the probability of z-scores falling between -14unknown/7 and 14unknown/7 for the first sampling distribution, and between -18unknown/9 and 18unknown/9 for the second sampling distribution.

Since the z-score interval is wider for the second sampling distribution, it will have a greater probability of x falling between 6 and 10.

Therefore, the second x distribution based on samples of size n=81 has a greater probability of P(6 < x < 10) than the first x distribution based on samples of size n=49.

Learn more about x distribution here

brainly.com/question/24130124

#SPJ4

The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:

Suppose an x distribution has mean μ = 8. Consider two corresponding x distributions, the first based on samples of size n = 49 and the second based on samples of size n = 81. For which x distribution is P(6 < x < 10) greater?

Check the picture below.

[tex](8+16)(8)=(12+x)(12)\implies 192=144+12x \\\\\\ 48=12x\implies \cfrac{48}{12}=x\implies 4=x[/tex]

The answer is: B' = {1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9} and C' = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}, and A n (B'UC) = {2, 4, 5, 7}. This can be answered by the concept of Sets.

The complement of set B (denoted as B') in the universal set U is the set of natural numbers less than 11 that are not in B. The complement of set C (denoted as C') in the universal set U is the set of natural numbers less than 11 that are not in C. The intersection of set A with the union of sets B' and C (denoted as A n (B'UC)) is the set of elements that are common to set A and the union of sets B' and C, where B' is the complement of set B and C' is the complement of set C.

The universal set U consists of natural numbers less than 11: U = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}.

Set B' is the complement of set B in the universal set U, which means it contains all the elements of U that are not in B: B' = {1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9}.

Set C' is the complement of set C in the universal set U, which means it contains all the elements of U that are not in C: C' = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}.

The union of sets B' and C is the set of all elements that are in either B' or C or in both: B'UC = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9}.

The intersection of set A with the union of sets B' and C is the set of elements that are common to set A and the union of sets B' and C: A n (B'UC) = {2, 4, 5, 7}.

Therefore, the main answer is: B' = {1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9} and C' = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}, and A n (B'UC) = {2, 4, 5, 7}

To learn more about Sets here:

brainly.com/question/31087724#

#SPJ11

The value of r is 0.953.

The correlation coefficient i.e., r is calculated by the formula,

r = nΣxy - (Σx)(Σy)/√(nΣx²-(Σx)²)(nΣy²-(Σy)²

where n = 5 is the sample size.

We create a table of required values,

x        y          x²          y²           xy

4        2         16           4             8  

5        9         25         81            45

8        10        64         100         80

9        12         81         144         108

13       23       169        529        299

∑ 39      56        355       858        540

Substitute the values in the formula,

r = (5 × 540 - (39)(56))/(√(5 × 355 - (39)²)(5 × 858 - (56)²))

r = (2700 - 2184)/(√(254)(1154)

r = 516/√(293116)

r = 516/541.4018

r = 0.953

Therefore, the value of r is 0.953.

Learn more about correlation coefficient click;

https://brainly.com/question/15577278

#SPJ1

The required answer is  If t: R2 → R2 rotates vectors about the origin through an angle φ.

If t rotates vectors about the origin through an angle φ, then it satisfies the properties of linearity: t(u+v) = t(u) + t(v) and t(cu) = ct(u) for any vectors u,v in r2 and scalar c. Therefore, t is a linear transformation.
True: If t: R2 → R2 rotates vectors about the origin through an angle φ, then t is a linear transformation.

Transformation of three phase electrical quantities to two phase quantities is a usual practice to simplify analysis of three phase electrical circuits. Polyphase  machines can be represented by an equivalent two phase model provided the rotating polyphases winding in rotor and the stationary polyphase windings in stator can be expressed in a fictitious two axes coils. The process f replacing one set of variables to another related set of variable is called winding transformation or simply transformation or linear transformation. The term linear transformation means that the transformation from old to new set of variable and vice versa is governed by linear equations. The equations relating old variables and new variables are called transformation equation and the following general form:

This is because the rotation of vectors satisfies the properties of a linear transformation, which are:
1. Additivity: t(u + v) = t(u) + t(v) for all vectors u and v in R2.
2. Homogeneity: t(αu) = αt(u) for all vectors u in R2 and all scalars α.

There are at least a countable infinity of rotation vectors corresponding to any rotation. Furthermore, all rotations by 2πM are the same as no rotation at all, so, for a given integer M, all rotation vectors of length 2πM, in all directions, constitute a two-parameter uncountable infinity of rotation vectors encoding the same rotation as the zero vector.

The axis–angle representation is equivalent to the more concise rotation vector, also called the Euler vector. In this case, both the rotation axis and the angle are represented by a vector codirectional with the rotation axis whose length is the rotation angle θ,
Rotating vectors about the origin through an angle φ preserves these properties, making t a linear transformation.

To know more about linear transformation. Click on the link.

https://brainly.com/question/30514241

#SPJ11

The probability that both of the selected letters are same letters is 1/10 or 0.1.

First, we need to determine the total number of ways to select two letters from the word "examination".

The word "examination" has 11 letters. Therefore, there are 11 ways to choose the first letter, and 10 ways to choose the second letter (since we cannot choose the same letter again).

So, the total number of ways to select two letters from "examination" is 11 * 10 = 110.

Next, we need to determine the number of ways to select two same letters.

We can choose any of the 11 letters, and the second letter must be the same as the first letter.

So, there are 11 ways to choose the same pair of letters.

Therefore, the probability of selecting two same letters is:

11 / 110 = 1 / 10

So, the probability that both of the selected letters are same letters is 1/10 or 0.1.

Read more about probability at

https://brainly.com/question/251701

#SPJ1

The answer is A) The value 12 represents the number of tiles in the first row of the design.

An expression that consists of a number, a variable, and an exponent. The variable is usually a letter such as x or n, and the exponent is a number that indicates how many times the variable is multiplied by itself.

This answer is correct because 12 x 2⁻¹ is an exponential expression, which means that it is used to represent a pattern of repeated multiplication of the same number.

In this case, the number is 2, and the exponent is -1.

This means that the value of 12 is the number of tiles in the first row of the design, 2 times the number of tiles in the first row of the design, 4 times the number of tiles in the first row of the design, and so on. Therefore, the value of 12 represents the number of tiles in the first row of the design.

The other answer choices are incorrect because they do not take into account the exponential nature of the expression.

The value of 12 does not represent the number of tiles in the last row of the design, nor does it represent the number of tiles in the first row of the design.

For more questions related to variable

https://brainly.com/question/112703

#SPJ1