How fast can the 145 A current through a 0.170 H inductor be shut off if the induced emf cannot exceed 78.0 V?

The 4.00 mm measurement is the most precise, but without knowing the true or accepted value, it is impossible to determine which measurement is the most accurate.

Precision refers to how close repeated measurements are to each other, while accuracy refers to how close a measured value is to the true or accepted value.

A 4.00 mm measurement has the highest level of precision, as it includes two decimal places, meaning it is accurate to 0.01 mm. However, its accuracy would depend on what the true or accepted value is, which is not provided in the question.

A 4.00 m measurement has the lowest level of precision, as it only includes two significant figures, meaning it is accurate to 0.01 m. However, it may be more accurate than the other measurements if the true or accepted value is closer to 4.00 m than to the other values.

A 40.00 m measurement has the same level of precision as the 4.00 cm measurement, but it is more accurate than the other measurements as it is closer to the true or accepted value of 40.00 m.

Learn more about measurements at

https://brainly.com/question/27233632

#SPJ1

1.01 x 10-6 m/sec is the speed of advance of the glacier in m/s

1 foot = .3048 meters

105 ft = 105(.3048) = 32.004 m

(365.25 days)(24 hrs/day)(60 min/hr)(60 sec/min)

= 31,557,600 sec/yr

m/sec = 32.004/31557600 = 1.0141455624 x 10-6 m/sec

Round to 1.01 x 10-6 m/sec

Hubbard Glacier in Alaska has been slowly thickening and moving towards Disenchantment Bay since observations began in 1895. The progress contrasts with several neighbouring thinning and receding glaciers in Alaska and elsewhere in the world.

Hubbard Glacier's base ice is around 400 years old since it takes that long for ice to travel the glacier's entire length. Frequently, icebergs the size of a ten-story structure are calved off by the glacier.

Sea levels are rising as a result of glaciers, such those that cover Greenland, melting as a result of climate change.  

learn more about Hubbard Glacier

https://brainly.com/question/14485726

#SPJ1

To solve this problem, we need to use Einstein's famous equation, E=mc^2, which relates energy and mass. Mass is a E= mc2 answer is 4.86×10^54 kg.

Consumers are an important part of food chains and food webs in ecosystems, as they help to transfer energy and nutrients between different levels of the food chain. Without consumers, the energy stored in plants and other producers would not be available to other organisms in the ecosystem, which could have significant impacts on the overall health and functioning of the ecosystem.

An ecosystem refers to a community of living organisms and their physical environment interacting as a system. It can be a small area, such as a pond or a forest, or a larger area, such as a desert or an ocean.

To know more about consumer visit :

https://brainly.com/question/15869639

#SPJ1

Answer:

The Canis Major Dwarf galaxy is currently being absorbed by the Milky Way galaxy. The gravitational pull of the Milky Way is slowly pulling the Canis Major Dwarf galaxy apart and incorporating its stars into the Milky Way. This process is expected to continue for several billion years until the Canis Major Dwarf galaxy is completely assimilated by the Milky Way.

The orbital period of an exoplanet using a light curve is calculated using the length of time between each dip in the light curve, represented by a line that drops below the normal light intensity.

Planet | Mass of parent star (relative to sun) | Orbital Period (days) | Distance from parent star (AU) | Distance from parent star (km)

Kepler-5b | 1.37 Ms | 3.55 | 0.05064 | 7,580,000

Kepler-6b | 1.21 Ms | 3.23 | 0.04559 | 6,820,000

Kepler-7b | 1.36 Ms | 4.89 | 0.06250 | 9,350,000

Kepler-8b | 1.21 Ms | 3.52 | 0.04828 | 7,220,000

Kepler-9b | 1.04 Ms | 384.84 | 1.046 | 156,500,000

Read more about Kepler's third law here:

https://brainly.com/question/16705471

#SPJ1

Answer:

0.163 rad/s^2

Explanation:

Let's start by calculating the gravitational potential energy of each pulley:

[tex]U = mgh[/tex]

For pulleys 1 and 2, the height difference is the same and is equal to the difference in radius:

[tex]h = R_o_u_t - R_i_n = 18in - 9in = 9in[/tex]

Using the given masses and converting to units of pounds, we can calculate the potential energy of pulleys 1 and 2:

[tex]U_1 = m_1gh = 210 lb * 9.81 m/s^2*9 in. / 12 in./ft = 144.2lb*ft[/tex]

[tex]U_2 = m_2gh = 210 lb * 9.81 m/s^2 * 9 in. / 12 in./ft = 144.2 lb*ft[/tex]

For pulleys 3, 4, and 5, the height difference is different for each pulley, and is equal to the difference in height between the top and bottom masses:

[tex]h_3 = 2 (R_o_u_t - R_i_n) = 2(18 in. - 9 in.) = 18 in.[/tex]

[tex]h_4 = 3 (R_o_u_t - R_i_n) = 3 (18 in. - 9 in.) = 27 in.[/tex]

[tex]h_5 = 4 (R_o_u_t - R_i_n) = 4 (18 in. - 9 in.) = 36 in.[/tex]

Using the given masses and converting to units of pounds, we can calculate the potential energy of pulleys 3, 4, and 5:

[tex]U_3 = m_3 g h_3 = 510 lb *9.81 m/s^2 * 18 in. / 12 in./ft = 748.5 lb*ft[/tex]

[tex]U_4 = m_4 g h_4 = 350 lb * 9.81 m/s^2 * 27 in. / 12 in./ft = 687.3 lb*ft[/tex]

[tex]U_5 = m_5 g h_5 = 130 lb * 9.81 m/s^2 * 36 in. / 12 in./ft = 382.8 lb*ft[/tex]

The total potential energy of the system is the sum of the potential energies of all pulleys:

[tex]U_t_o_t_a_l = U_1 + U_2 + U_3 + U_4 + U_5 \\= 210.0 lb*ft + 210.0 lb*ft + 748.5 lb*ft + 687.3 lb*ft + 382.8 lb*ft \\= 2238.6 lb*ft[/tex]

At the start, all pulleys are at rest, so the total kinetic energy of the system is zero. As the system moves, the potential energy is converted into kinetic energy, which is proportional to the angular velocity and the moment of inertia of each pulley:

[tex]K = \frac{1}{2} Iw^2[/tex]

The total kinetic energy of the system is the sum of the kinetic energies of all pulleys:

[tex]K_t_o_t_a_l = \frac{1}{2} I_1 w_1^2 + (1/2) I_2 w_2^2 + \frac{1}{2} I_3 w_3^2 + \frac{1}{2} I_4 w_4^2 +\frac{1}{2} I_5 w_5^2[/tex]

Since the system starts at rest, the total initial energy is equal to the total potential energy of the system:

[tex]E_i = U_t_o_t_a_l = 2238.6 lb*ft[/tex]

As the system moves, the total energy remains constant, so the final energy is also equal to the total potential energy:

[tex]E_f = U_t_o_t_a_l = 2238.6 lb*ft[/tex]

We can now use the conservation of energy principle to relate the initial and final energies to the kinetic energies of each pulley, and hence to their angular accelerations:

[tex]E_i = E_f + K_1 + K_2 + K_3 + K_4 + K_5[/tex]

Substituting the expressions for the kinetic energy and simplifying, we obtain:

[tex]w_1 = w_2 = w_3 = w_4 = w_5 = \sqrt{2g (\frac{U_t_o_t_a_l}{5I})} = 1.023 rad/s[/tex]

Finally, the angular acceleration of each pulley is given by:

[tex]\alpha_1 = \alpha _2 =\alpha _3 = \alpha_4 = \alpha_5 = \frac{w}{t} =\frac{w}{2\pi} = 0.163 rad/s^2[/tex]

Therefore, the angular acceleration of each pulley is 0.163 rad/s^2.

The work done on the bike and girl is -954.67 Joules.

To find the work done on the bike and the girl, we can use the work-energy principle, which states that the work done on an object is equal to its change in kinetic energy.

The initial kinetic energy of the bike and girl is given by:

KEi = 1/2 * m * v²

where m is the mass and v is the velocity

KEi = 1/2 * 26 kg * (6.64 m/s)²

KEi = 954.67 J

The final kinetic energy of the bike and girl is zero, since they come to a stop. Therefore, the change in kinetic energy is:

ΔKE = KEf - KEi = -KEi

The work done on the bike and girl is equal to the negative of the initial kinetic energy:

W = -KEi

W = -954.67 J

To know more about work done, here

brainly.com/question/31506558

#SPJ1

The coefficient of kinetic friction that would allow the block to return to equilibrium and stop is given by (kx)/mg.

Let's analyze the motion of the block in order to determine the coefficient of kinetic friction that would allow the block to return to equilibrium and stop.

First, let's consider the forces acting on the block when it is pulled from equilibrium and released. Initially, when the block is pulled a distance x from equilibrium, the only force acting on it is the force exerted by the spring, which is given by Hooke's Law:

F_spring = -kx

where;

When the block is released, it will experience an acceleration due to the force exerted by the spring. As it moves towards equilibrium, the spring force will decrease until it becomes zero when the block reaches the equilibrium position. At this point, the only force acting on the block will be the kinetic friction force, which opposes the motion of the block.

The equation of motion for the block can be given by Newton's second law:

F_net = ma

where;

Since the only force acting on the block is the kinetic friction force when it reaches equilibrium, we can equate the net force with the kinetic friction force:

F_friction = ma

where;

Now, let's express the kinetic friction force in terms of the coefficient of kinetic friction μ_k and the normal force N. The normal force is the force exerted by the surface on the block and is equal in magnitude to the weight of the block, which is given by:

N = mg

where;

The kinetic friction force can be expressed as:

F_friction = μ_kN

Substituting the expression for N, we get:

F_friction = μ_kmg

Now, equating this with ma, we have:

μ_kmg = ma

Canceling the mass from both sides, we get:

μ_kg = a

Now, we can substitute the expression for acceleration a with the acceleration due to the spring force using Hooke's Law:

μ_kg = (kx)/m

Finally, solving for the coefficient of kinetic friction μ_k, we get:

μ_k = (kx)/mg

Learn more about coefficient of friction here: https://brainly.com/question/20241845

#SPJ1

The half-life of this substance, which decreases 1/20 of original in one hour is 13.9 minutes.

The number of radioactive nuclei in a sample follows an exponential decay model:

[tex]N(t) = N_0 e^{-\lambda t}[/tex],

where N(t) is the number of nuclei remaining after a time t, [tex]N_0[/tex] is the initial number of nuclei, and λ is the decay constant.

The time required for the number of nuclei to decrease to half of its initial value is called the half-life [tex]t_{1/2}[/tex] of the substance. We can use the given information to find the value of [tex]t_{1/2}[/tex]:

[tex]N(t) = \dfrac{1}{2} N_0 = N_0 e^{-\lambda t_{1/2}}[/tex]

Taking the natural logarithm of both sides, we get:

ln(1/2) = -λ[tex]t_{1/2}[/tex]

Solving for [tex]t_{1/2}[/tex], we obtain:

[tex]t_{1/2}[/tex] = ln(2)/λ

We are given that the number of radioactive nuclei decreases to 1/20 of the original number in one hour, which means that the fraction of nuclei remaining after one hour is:

[tex]\dfrac{N(1 hour)}{N_0} = \dfrac{1}{20}\\ = e^{-\lambda \times 1 hour}[/tex]

Solving for λ, we get:

λ = -ln(1/20)/1 hour

Substituting this value of λ into the expression for [tex]t_{1/2}[/tex], we get:

[tex]t_{1/2}[/tex] = ln(2)/(-ln(1/20)/1 hour) = 13.9 minutes

To know more about radioactive, here

brainly.com/question/1770619

#SPJ1

Once it was halfway to home plate, the ball would have dropped 1.75 meters vertically.

How quickly anything is traveling is determined by its speed. The amount of space covered in a given amount of time is a scalar quantity. Calculating speed involves dividing the distance traveled by the time needed to complete that distance.

The vertical displacement of the ball when it is halfway to home plate can be calculated using the equations of motion, assuming the pitch is delivered on a level field.

Gravitational acceleration is -9.81 m/s2 and the pitch's initial vertical velocity is zero. How long does it take for the pitch to go halfway to home plate?

t = d/v

t = 19 m / (32.0 m/s)

t = 0.594 s

The formula d = vit + 1/2at2 d = 0 + 1/2(-9.81 m/s2) *(0.594 s)2 d = -1.75 m can be used to determine the vertical displacement of the ball during this time.

The ball falls downhill vertically as expected, as indicated by the negative sign. Once it was halfway to home plate, the ball would have dropped 1.75 meters vertically.

To know more about speed, visit:

brainly.com/question/28224010

#SPJ1

The number of cans would be approximately 5 cans

The energy required to bring a certain amount of water to a boil can be calculated using the specific heat capacity of water, which is 4.184 J/g°C. The energy required to raise the temperature of one gram of water by one degree Celsius is 4.184 J.

To find out how many cans of water could be brought to a boil using the energy in one can of Coke, we need to calculate the total energy in one can of Coke, and then divide that by the energy required to bring one can of water to a boil.

First, let's convert the volume of the can from milliliters to liters:

355 mL = 0.355 L

The mass of the Coke in the can can be found using its density, which is approximately 1 g/mL:

mass = volume x density = 0.355 L x 1 g/mL = 0.355 kg

The energy in the can of Coke can be calculated using the number of food calories it contains:

energy = 140 food calories x 1000 cal/kcal x 4.184 J/cal = 585,760 J

To find out how many cans of water could be brought to a boil using this energy, we need to calculate the energy required to bring one can of water to a boil:

energy required = mass x specific heat capacity x temperature change

For one can of water, the mass is:

mass = volume x density = 0.355 L x 1000 g/L = 355 g

The temperature change required to bring the water to a boil from room temperature (20°C) is:

temperature change = boiling point of water - room temperature = 100°C - 20°C = 80°C

Therefore, the energy required to bring one can of water to a boil is:

energy required = 355 g x 4.184 J/g°C x 80°C = 118,782 J

Finally, we can find out how many cans of water could be brought to a boil using the energy in one can of Coke:

number of cans of water = energy in Coke / energy required per can of water

number of cans of water = 585,760 J / 118,782 J = 4.93

Read more on density here:https://brainly.com/question/1354972

#SPJ1

Answer:

(a) To find the tension in the cord when the stretch is 16.7 m, we need to first determine which spring constant applies to this stretch. Since 16.7 m is greater than 4.88 m, the spring constant for x ≥ 4.88 m applies, which is

�

2

=

111

�

/

�

k

2

=111N/m.

Next, we need to find the force exerted by the bungee cord at this stretch. The force F(x) exerted by a spring is given by:

F(x) = kx

where k is the spring constant and x is the stretch. Plugging in the values for k and x, we get:

F(16.7) = (111 N/m)(16.7 m) = 1853.7 N

Therefore, the tension in the cord when the stretch is 16.7 m is 1853.7 N.

(b) To find the work done against the elastic force of the bungee cord to stretch it 16.7 m, we need to integrate the force over the stretch. Since the spring constant changes at 4.88 m, we need to break up the integration into two parts.

For 0 ≤ x ≤ 4.88 m, the force is given by:

F(x) = k

1

x

where k

1

= 204 N/m. Integrating this expression over the stretch from 0 to 4.88 m, we get:

W

1

= ∫

4.88

0

k

1

x dx = (204 N/m) * (4.88 m)

2

/ 2 = 996.8 J

For 4.88 m ≤ x ≤ 16.7 m, the force is given by:

F(x) = k

2

x

where k

2

= 111 N/m. Integrating this expression over the stretch from 4.88 m to 16.7 m, we get:

W

2

= ∫

16.7

4.88

k

2

x dx = (111 N/m) * (16.7 m)

2

/ 2 - (111 N/m) * (4.88 m)

2

/ 2 = 1232.8 J

Therefore, the total work done against the elastic force of the bungee cord to stretch it 16.7 m is:

W = W

1

+ W

2

= 996.8 J + 1232.8 J = 2229.6 J

(a) To solve for the mass of the rod, we can use the formula for rotational kinetic energy:

KE = (1/2) * I * w^2

where KE is the rotational kinetic energy, I is the moment of inertia, and w is the angular velocity.

At the beginning, when the bug is at the axis of rotation, the rotational kinetic energy of the rod is:

KE1 = (1/2) * I * w^2 = (1/2) * (3.10×10−3 kg⋅m^2) * (0.37 rad/s)^2 = 0.036 J

When the bug reaches the other end of the rod, the rotational kinetic energy is:

KE2 = (1/2) * I * w^2 = (1/2) * (3.10×10−3 kg⋅m^2) * (0.132 m/s)^2 / (0.480 m)^2 = 3.62×10^-5 J

The change in kinetic energy is due to the work done by the bug as it crawls along the rod. The work done by the bug can be calculated as the product of the force it exerts on the rod and the distance it crawls:

W = F * d

The force the bug exerts on the rod can be calculated using Newton's second law for rotational motion:

τ = I * α

where τ is the torque, α is the angular acceleration, and I is the moment of inertia.

Since the rod is rotating with a constant angular velocity, its angular acceleration is zero, so the net torque on the rod must be zero. This means that the torque exerted by the bug on the rod must be equal and opposite to the torque due to the angular momentum of the rod:

τ_bug = τ_rod

F * d = I * w

F = I * w / d

Substituting the values given, we get:

F = (3.10×10−3 kg⋅m^2) * (0.37 rad/s) / (0.480 m) = 0.0237 N

Now we can use the work-energy principle to find the mass of the rod:

W = KE2 - KE1 = F * d = (1/2) * m * v^2

where m is the mass of the rod and v is the tangential velocity of the bug at the end of the rod.

Substituting the values given, we get:

(1/2) * m * (0.132 m/s)^2 = 3.62×10^-5 J - 0.036 J

Simplifying and solving for m, we get:

m = 0.221 kg

Therefore, the mass of the rod is 0.221 kg.

(b) To find the mass of the bug, we can use the same equation we used to calculate the force it exerted on the rod:

F = I * α / d

where α is the angular acceleration of the rod caused by the bug crawling along it.

Since the rod is a thin uniform rod, its moment of inertia can be calculated as:

I = (1/3) * m * L^2

where L is the length of the rod.

Substituting the values given, we get:

I = (1/3) * (0.221 kg) * (0.480 m)^2 = 0.0202 kg⋅m^2

Now we can calculate the angular acceleration caused by the bug crawling along the rod. Since the rod is rotating with a constant angular velocity, its angular acceleration is given by:

α

Fade

finish

α = (w_f^2 - w_i^2) / (2 * θ)

where w_i is the initial angular velocity of the rod, w_f is the final angular velocity of the rod after the bug has crawled to the end, and θ is the angle through which the bug crawls, which is equal to the length of the rod:

θ = L = 0.480 m

Substituting the values given, we get:

α = (0.132 m/s)^2 / (2 * 0.480 m) = 0.072 rad/s^2

Now we can calculate the force exerted by the bug on the rod:

F = I * α / d = (0.0202 kg⋅m^2) * (0.072 rad/s^2) / (0.480 m) = 0.00303 N

Finally, we can use Newton's second law to find the mass of the bug:

F = m * a

where a is the tangential acceleration of the bug, given by:

a = r * α

where r is the distance from the bug to the axis of rotation, which is equal to the length of the rod minus the distance the bug has crawled, or:

r = L - d = 0.480 m - 0.480 m = 0 m

Therefore, the tangential acceleration of the bug is zero, and its mass is:

m = F / a = 0.00303 N / 0 m/s^2 = undefined

This means that the force exerted by the bug on the rod is not enough to cause any tangential acceleration, and therefore the mass of the bug is negligible compared to the mass of the rod. We can assume that the bug has zero mass for practical purposes.

Okay, let's solve this step-by-step:

1) Given:

A → = 2.0 x ^ − 3.2 y ^

B → = − 1.2 x ^ + 2.9 y ^

Find: Angle between D → = A → − B → and positive x-axis

2) Subtract the vectors to find D →:

D → = 2.0 x ^ − 3.2 y ^ - (− 1.2 x ^ + 2.9 y ^ )

= 2.0 x ^ − 3.2 y ^ + 1.2 x ^ - 2.9 y ^

= 3.2 x ^ − 6.1 y ^

3) To find the angle, we use the inverse tangent ratio of y/x:

Angle = tan−1(−6.1/3.2) = -61.97°

4) Since the angle is in the 4th quadrant, it is measured clockwise from the positive x-axis. So the final angle is 180 - 61.97 = 118.03°

Therefore, the angle between the vector D → = A → − B → and the positive x-axis is 118.03°.

Let me know if you have any other questions!

Answer:

Positive zero error: When the jaws of the caliper are closed, the zero mark on the vernier scale is to the right of the zero mark on the main scale. This means that the caliper reads a value greater than the actual value, leading to a positive zero error.

Negative zero error: When the jaws of the caliper are closed, the zero mark on the vernier scale is to the left of the zero mark on the main scale. This means that the caliper reads a value less than the actual value, leading to a negative zero error.

(a) The work input on the machine is 10 J.

(b) The work output of the machine is 80 J.

(b) The Machanical advantage of the machine is 20.

Machine is any device that enables work to be done easily.

(a) To calculate the work input of the machine, we use the formula below

Formula:

Where:

From the question,

Given:

Substitute these values into equation 1

(b) Also, for work output, we use the formula below

Where:

Substitute these values into equation 2

(c) To calculate the mechanical advantage of the machine, we use the formula below

Given:

Substitute into equation 3

Lean more about machine here: https://brainly.com/question/31373165

#SPJ1

The PVC pipe should be cut to a length of 32.6 centimeters to produce a C5 note.

Pitch refers to the perceived highness or lowness of a sound, which is determined by its frequency. A higher frequency corresponds to a higher pitch, while a lower frequency corresponds to a lower pitch.

To determine the length of a flute made from PVC pipe that produces a desired pitch, we can use the formula:

L = (v/2f) * n

where L is the length of the pipe, v is the velocity of sound in air, f is the frequency of the desired pitch, and n is the number of open and closed nodes in the standing wave produced by the pipe.

For a pipe that is open on both ends (like a flute), n = 2. The velocity of sound in air is approximately 343 meters per second at room temperature.

To convert the desired frequency of C5 (523.25 Hz) to meters per second, we can use the formula:

v = f * λ

where λ is the wavelength of the sound wave. For C5, λ is approximately 0.65 meters (since the speed of sound in air is about 343 m/s, and the wavelength of C5 is 343 m/s divided by 523.25 Hz).

So, we can calculate the length of the PVC pipe needed for C5 as:

L = (v/2f) * n = (343/2*523.25) * 2 * 0.65 = 0.326 meters or 32.6 centimeters

Therefore, To create a C5 note, the PVC tubing should be cut to a length of about 32.6 centimeters.

To learn more about Frequency click:

brainly.com/question/1292129

#SPJ1

The radiative zone is deep inside the star but not hot enough to produce fusion. Heat is carried through it by radiation. Thus, option C is correct.

A stellar core is a dense and extremely hot region in the center of the star. In the region of the core, temperature, and pressure is responsible for the nuclear fusion takes place. The next inner layer is a radiative zone which is present outside of the core. The light emitted by nuclear fusion travels out to the next layer of the zone called a radiative zone.

The convection zone is made up of plasma and in the convective zone, the convection process takes place. The convective zone is unstable as the flux of matter travels from the hottest region to the coldest region. The corona forms the outermost layer of the star where fusion is not taking place.

Thus, the correct option is C) Radiative zone.

To learn more layers of the sun:

https://brainly.com/question/15891213

#SPJ1

Answer:

The formula to calculate average speed is:

average speed = total distance / total time

In this case, the distance covered is 500 meters and the time taken is 14.5 minutes. However, we need to convert the time to seconds to get the answer in meters per second.

14.5 minutes = 14.5 x 60 seconds = 870 seconds

So, the average speed is:

average speed = total distance / total time

average speed = 500 meters / 870 seconds

average speed = 0.57 meters per second

Therefore, the average speed of the runner is 0.57 meters per second.

We can use the laws of physics to solve this problem. The key here is to recognize that the initial kinetic energy of the car (due to its speed) is converted into potential energy as it goes up the ramp, and then back into kinetic energy as it falls back down.

Using conservation of energy, we can set the initial kinetic energy equal to the final potential energy at the maximum height:

(1/2) * m * v^2 = m * g * h

where m is the mass of the car, v is its initial speed (30 m/s), g is the acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s^2), and h is the maximum height.

Simplifying the equation and solving for h, we get:

h = (v^2 * sin^2(theta)) / (2 * g)

where theta is the angle of the ramp (37 degrees in this case).

Plugging in the known values, we get:

h = (30^2 * sin^2(37)) / (2 * 9.81) ≈ 79.1 meters

So the car will reach a height of approximately 79.1 meters off the ground.

To find the maximum height of the gorge that the car could clear, we need to look at the horizontal distance that the car travels while in the air. This distance is given by:

d = v * t

where t is the time that the car spends in the air. We can find t by setting the initial potential energy (at the maximum height) equal to the final kinetic energy (at the end of the jump):

m * g * h = (1/2) * m * (v_f^2)

where v_f is the final velocity of the car at the end of the jump (when it lands back on the ground). We can solve for v_f using:

v_f = sqrt(2gh)

where h is the maximum height (found earlier). Plugging this into the conservation of energy equation, we get:

t = sqrt(2h/g)

Now we can plug in the known values for v and theta to get:

d = 30 * sqrt(2h/g) * cos(theta)

Plugging in the values for h and theta, we get:

d = 30 * sqrt(2*79.1/9.81) * cos(37) ≈ 187.2 meters

So the maximum height of the gorge that the car could clear is approximately 187.2 meters.

The rich merchant can save himself by throwing some gold coins in one direction.

You finally remembered Newton's second law of motion, which states that the acceleration of an object is directly proportional to the net force applied to it and inversely proportional to its mass.

Newton's third rule of motion states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. When he tosses the gold coins in one direction, the flung coins cause a rebound force in the opposing direction. This recoil force will provide him with a little amount of velocity, which he may then employ to go in the opposite direction he tossed the coins. He can slowly make his way to the coast by continuing this method.

It is because the heavier hammer has more mass than the toy hammer, when the same force is applied to both hammers, the heavier hammer suffers less acceleration than the lighter hammer. This implies that the heavier hammer applies more power to the nail, making it easier to drive into the hard wood.

Find out more on Newtons laws here: https://brainly.com/question/14222453

#SPJ1

Answer: the lowest note that would be possible to blow on this brass pipe is approximately 1700 Hz

Explanation: f = c / (2L)

where c is the speed of sound in brass, which is around 340 m/s.

Changing over the length of the pipe to meters, we have:

L = 10 cm = 0.1 m

Stopping within the values, we get:

f = 340 / (2 x 0.1) = 1700 Hz

The current in the circuit when AP is 40.0 cm is 2.5 A.

We can use Ohm's law to calculate the current in the circuit:

V = IR

where V is the voltage, I is the current, and R is the resistance.

The resistance of the wire AX can be calculated as:

R = ρ ([tex]\frac{L}{A}[/tex])

where ρ is the resistivity of the wire material, L is the length of the wire, and A is the cross-sectional area of the wire.

Since the resistance per unit length of wire AX is given as 2 [tex]\frac{ohm}{m}[/tex] ,we can calculate the resistance of a 40 cm length of wire AX as:

R = (2 [tex]\frac{ohm}{m}[/tex]) × ([tex]\frac{40 cm}{100 \frac{cm}{m}}[/tex]) = 0.8 ohm

Using the voltmeter reading across R as 2.0V and the battery voltage as 4.0V, we can calculate the voltage across the wire AX as:

V = 4.0V - 2.0V = 2.0V

Therefore, we can calculate the current in the circuit as:

I = [tex]\frac{V}{R}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{2.0V }{0.8 ohm}[/tex] = 2.5 A

To know more about voltage-resistance problem, visit:

https://brainly.in/question/16222470

Answer:

Explanation:

the correct answer is option A: Decreasing the concentration would decrease the reaction rate.

The estimated distance between the intervening galaxies responsible for the two sets of lines is between 729 and 771 Mpc.

We can use the Hubble's law, which relates the recession velocity of a galaxy to its distance, to estimate the distance between the intervening galaxies responsible for the two sets of lines.

The Hubble's law is given by:

v = H0 × d

where v is the recession velocity of the galaxy, d is the distance to the galaxy, and H0 is the Hubble constant.

We are given that the quasar has a redshift of 0.20, which corresponds to a recession velocity of:

v = z × c

where z is the redshift and c is the speed of light. Substituting the given values, we get:

v = 0.20 × 3 × 10^5 km/s = 60,000 km/s

We are also given that the two sets of absorption lines are redshifted by 0.17 and 0.180, respectively. This means that the intervening galaxies responsible for the absorption lines are receding away from us at velocities of:

v1 = z1 × c = 0.17 × 3 × 10^5 km/s = 51,000 km/s

v2 = z2 × c = 0.180 × 3 × 10^5 km/s = 54,000 km/s

Using the Hubble's law, we can estimate the distances to the galaxies:

d1 = v1 / H0 = 51,000 km/s / 70 km/s/Mpc = 729 Mpc

d2 = v2 / H0 = 54,000 km/s / 70 km/s/Mpc = 771 Mpc

Learn more about Hubble law:https://brainly.com/question/13705068

#SPJ1

The estimated distance between the intervening galaxies responsible for the two sets of lines is between 729 and 771 Mpc.

We can use the Hubble's law, which relates the recession velocity of a galaxy to its distance, to estimate the distance between the intervening galaxies responsible for the two sets of lines.

The Hubble's law is given by:

v = H0 × d

where v is the recession velocity of the galaxy, d is the distance to the galaxy, and H0 is the Hubble constant.

We are given that the quasar has a redshift of 0.20, which corresponds to a recession velocity of:

v = z × c

where z is the redshift and c is the speed of light. Substituting the given values, we get:

v = 0.20 × 3 × 10^5 km/s = 60,000 km/s

We are also given that the two sets of absorption lines are redshifted by 0.17 and 0.180, respectively. This means that the intervening galaxies responsible for the absorption lines are receding away from us at velocities of:

v1 = z1 × c = 0.17 × 3 × 10^5 km/s = 51,000 km/s

v2 = z2 × c = 0.180 × 3 × 10^5 km/s = 54,000 km/s

Using the Hubble's law, we can estimate the distances to the galaxies:

d1 = v1 / H0 = 51,000 km/s / 70 km/s/Mpc = 729 Mpc

d2 = v2 / H0 = 54,000 km/s / 70 km/s/Mpc = 771 Mpc

Learn more about Hubble law:https://brainly.com/question/13705068

#SPJ1

The plates are charged to 1.593 10-9 C.

Calculation-

A parallel-plate capacitor's capacitance is determined by:

C = ∈0 A / d

where A is the area of the plates, d is the distance between them, and 0 is the electric constant, also referred to as the permittivity of empty space.

Inputting the values provided yields:

C = (8.85 × [tex]10^-12[/tex] F/m) * 1.5 × [tex]10^-4[/tex] [tex]m^2 / (1.00 × 10^-3 m) = 1.3275 × 10^-10 F[/tex]

Charges are placed on the plates by:

Q = CV

V stands for the voltage applied across the plates. Inputting the values provided yields:

[tex]Q = (1.3275 × 10^-10 F) * 12 V = 1.593 × 10^-9 C[/tex]

to know more about capacitors here:

brainly.com/question/17176550

#SPJ1

The following statement is NOT an example of a heteronormative society, Asking a heterosexual person "when did you know you were straight?" Option d is correct.

The other options all reflect the ways in which society assumes heterosexuality as the default or normal sexual orientation, thereby marginalizing those who identify as LGBTQIA+. For example, asking a homosexual person "when did you know you were gay?" assumes that being gay is a deviation from the norm and requires an explanation, while assuming a person is "straight" until they come "out" as homosexual reinforces the idea that heterosexuality is the norm.

Similarly, the portrayal of most couples in the media as heterosexual reinforces the idea that heterosexuality is the default. In contrast, asking a heterosexual person "when did you know you were straight?" does not reinforce heteronormativity, as it is a question that is less commonly asked and does not assume that being straight is the norm. Option d is correct.

To know more about heterosexual, here

https://brainly.com/question/30531204

#SPJ1