Help me pleaseee jesussss (10 points )

the answer is effect

Answer:

this a effect you can change the change the water

All transformations that map the pattern onto itself are; a horizontal translation and a reflection across a vertical line.

A translation is represented by a change in the function graph, according to operations such as multiplication or sum/subtraction either in it’s range(involving values of y) or in it’s domain(involving values of x).

All these translations have predetermined rules that we apply to the figures.

The congruence of a triangle can be obtain through Rotation; Translation; or Reflection.

For this particular strip pattern onto itself, can be obtained by a horizontal translation and a reflection across a vertical line

All transformations that map the pattern onto itself are; a horizontal translation and a reflection across a vertical line.

Learn more about reflection here;

https://brainly.com/question/28186407

#SPJ2

Answer:

5x-4x+1=2

5x-4x=2-1

x=1ans

Answer:

D. 1

Step-by-step explanation:

P .= 2L + 2W at W= 10, P= 44

44 = 2L + 2 (10)

44 = 2L + 20

44-20 = 2L

24 = 2L

L= 24/2

L= 12cm

Answer:

500$+500$=1000$

Step-by-step explanation:

for songs=50×10=500$

for movie=5×100=500$

total=500$+500$=1000$

50x+100y

hope it helps:)

Answer:

60/2.5 = 24 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

if you are satisfied with the results then plz make me genius

Answer:

The answer is 24 inches.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

1 inch = 2.5 cm

or, 1 cm = 1/2.5 inch............... eqn (i)

Now,

Wideness of envelope = 60 cm

= 60 (1/2.5) inches [From eqn (i)]

= 60/2.5 inches

= 24 inches Ans

Answer:

To prove that ΔABC ≅ ΔMQR using SAS, we show that two sides with the intersection angle are congruent.

From the diagram, it is shown that CA is congruent to RM.

From the first option, given that m∠A = 64° and AB = MQ = 31 cm, then we have CA = RM, AB = MQ, and CAB = RMQ (i.e. m∠A = m∠M = 64°).

This shows that the first option is correct.

From the second option, given that CB = MQ = 29 cm, then we have CA = RM, CB = MQ, but ACB is not congruent to RMQ.

Thus the second option in not correct.

From the third option, m∠Q = 56° and CB ≅ RQ, then we have CA = RM, CB = RQ, ACB = 60°, but we do not know the value of MRQ.

Thus the third option is not correct.

From the fourth option, m∠R = 60° and AB ≅ MQ, then we have CA = RM, AB = MQ, RMQ = 64°, but we do not know the value of CAB.

Thus the fourth option is not correct.

From the fifth option, AB = QR = 31 cm, then we have CA = RM, AB = QR, but we do not know the value of CAB or MRQ.

Thus, the fifth option is not correct.

Therefore, the additional information that could be used to prove ΔABC ≅ ΔMQR using SAS is m∠A = 64° and AB = MQ = 31 cm

The additional information could be used to prove ABC≅MQR using SAS will be m∠R = 60° and AB≅MQ. Option D is correct.

Triangles that are equivalent in terms of size and form are known as congruent triangles.

The conditions for ABC≅MQR are;

m∠R = 60°

AB≅MQ

Using the new data, it is possible to demonstrate that m∠R = 60° and AB is equal to the MQ will result in ABC≅MQR using SAS.

Hence option D is correct.

To learn more about the congruent triangle refer;

https://brainly.com/question/12413243

#SPJ2

Answer:

0.02

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

coefficient is the number next to the variable.

Answer:

11/16, 3/5, 7/10

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:I think it’s option 2, light blue

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

10 11/18

Step-by-step explanation:

5 42/54   4 45/54

9 87/54

10 33/54

10 11/18

pleas give me a brainliest if this helped

Answer:

The answer is [tex]10\frac{11}{18}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given fractions are:

[tex]5\frac{7}{9} + 4\frac{5}{6}[/tex]

The given fractions are mixed fractions whose sum has to be found. In order to do this, the mixed fractions are first converted into proper fractions then the LCM is taken to find the sum.

So,

Converting the fractions into proper fractions

[tex]=\frac{52}{9} + \frac{29}{6}[/tex]

Taking LCM

[tex]=\frac{104+87}{18}\\=\frac{191}{18}[/tex]

Converting into mixed fraction

[tex]=10\frac{11}{18}[/tex]

Hence,

The answer is [tex]10\frac{11}{18}[/tex]

Answer:

1.) 7 ft = 84 in   2.) 100 yd= 300 ft  3.) 96 oz= 6 lbs  4.) 32 fl oz= 4 c  5.) 48 oz            6.) 80,000 lbs

Step-by-step explanation:

You have to use conversation rates.

1. 84

2. 300

3. 6

4. 4

5. 48

6. 80,000

Step-by-step explanation: I hope this made your day ツ

Answer:

Reverse the x and y:

x = 3y + 4.  

Now subtract 4 from both sides:

x - 4 = 3y

Divide both sides by 3:

1/3 x - 4/3 = y

Answer: 1, 8, 64, 512

Step-by-step explanation:

1^3 = 1 * 1 * 1 = 1

2^3 = 2 * 2 * 2 = 8

4^3 = 4 * 4 * 4 = 64

8^3 = 8 * 8 * 8 = 512

Answer:

70 < x < 105 and 0 < y ≤ 60

Step-by-step explanation:

The constraints that represent this real-world problem are; 70 < x < 105 and 0 < y ≤ 60 where x is the temperature and y is the number of people on your trip.

Inequality is defined as the relation which makes a non-equal comparison between two given functions.

Given:

The Range of temperature is between 70 and 105 degrees.

So, x lies between these two temperatures so x must be greater than 70 degrees but less than 105 degrees.

Therefore, x > 70and x < 105.

On combining these two inequalities we get,

70 < x < 105

Now, number of people that can come for the trip is 60.

y represents the number of people for the trip. So, y can be at most 60.

Or, y ≤ 60 must be less than or equal to 60 and is given as:

Hence, the constraints are:

70 < x < 105 and 0 < y ≤ 60

The constraints that represent this real-world problem are; 70 < x < 105 and 0 < y ≤ 60 where x is the temperature and y is the number of people on your trip.

Learn more about inequality ;

brainly.com/question/14164153

#SPJ2

Answer:

Governor of State B: $120,340; Governor of State A: $169,320

Step-by-step explanation:

For the sake of this problem, let's set the salary of State B's governor as x. That would make the salary of State A's governor equal to x+48980. The following lists out how to solve this problem.

Governor B salary + Governor A salary = $48980

x+x+48980=289660

2x+48980=289660

2x=240680

x=120340

120340+48980=169320

Answer:

$700

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that,

The sales tax in the town where Amanda lives is 5%.

Amanda paid $35  in sales tax on a new stereo.

We need to find the price of the stereo. Let it is x. Using the formula for percentage as follows :

[tex]\%=\dfrac{\text{sales tax}}{\text{total}}\times 100\\\\5\%=\dfrac{35}{x}\times 100\%\\\\x=\dfrac{35\times 100\%}{5\%}\\\\=\$700[/tex]

So, the price of the stereo is $700. Hence, the correct option is(c).

Answer:

-41.4°C

Step-by-step explanation:

1.1 * 23 = 25.3

16.1 + 25.3 = 41.4

(I prefer working with positive numbers and just switch the sign at the end)

Hope this helped.

-Pepsi

The temperature at midnight was approximately -28.2°C, here the temperature dropped by 1.1°C each hour.

From midnight to 11:00 am, there are a total of 11 hours (since 11:00 am is 11 hours after midnight).

Given that the temperature dropped 1.1°C each hour, the total temperature drop is 1.1°C/hour × 11 hours = 12.1°C.

To find the temperature at midnight, we subtract the total temperature drop from the temperature at 11:00 am:

Temperature at midnight = Temperature at 11:00 am - Total temperature drop

= -16.1°C - 12.1°C

= -28.2°C

Therefore, the temperature at midnight was approximately -28.2°C.

Learn more about the temperature here:

https://brainly.com/question/28516935

#SPJ4

Answer:

multiplication

Step-by-step explanation:

5x8=40

Answer:

If you mean which equation with variables can be used it is s/5 = 8

Step-by-step explanation:

Complete question :

The table shows data collected on the relationship between time spent playing video games and time spent with family. The line of best fit for the data is ý = -0.36x + 94.5.

Video Games (Minutes) Time with Family (Minutes)

40 80

55 75

70 69

85 64

A) According to the line of best fit, the predicted number of minutes spent with family for someone who spent 36 minutes playing video games is 81.54.

B) Is it reasonable to use this line of best fit to make the above prediction?

Answer:

81. 54

4) The estimate, a predicted time of 81.54 minutes, is both reliable and reasonable.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that :

The equation of best fit is defined as :

ý = -0.36x + 94.5.

A.) Predicted number of minutes spent with family (y) for someone who spends 36 minutes playing games (x) will be :

x = 36

From the model :

ý = -0.36(36) + 94.5

y = - 12.96 + 94.5

y = 81.54

Hence.nunber of minutes spent with family = 81.54 minutes.

B.) The correlation Coefficient for the model is - 0.9993, which indicates a very strong negative relationship between both variables. Hence, using this fact, we can conclude that the prediction is reliable. From the data also, spending 36 minutes playing games means such individual will have more time than someone who plays games for 40 minutes, hence, the prediction is also reasonable.

Answer:

Concept: Graph Analysis

Answer:

There is no other way you can expand the brackets

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: slope = 3/4

y intercept = 2

equation : y= 3/4x+2

Step-by-step explanation: