Estimate the area under the graph of f(x) = 5 cos(x) from x = 0 to x = π/2 using four approximating rectangles and right endpoints. (Round your answers to four decimal places.)
R4 =

Answer:

110.45 inches cubed

Step-by-step explanation:

5in x 4.7in x 4.7in

The holomorphic function f whose real part is u(x, y) = e^-2xy sin(x² - y²) is given by f(z) = e^(-z²)sin(z²).

This function is holomorphic because it satisfies the Cauchy-Riemann equations. The Cauchy-Riemann equations relate the partial derivatives of the real and imaginary parts of a holomorphic function with respect to the variables x and y.

In this case, the real part of f is u(x, y) = e^-2xy sin(x² - y²), and the imaginary part of f is v(x, y) = e^-2xy cos(x² - y²). By computing the partial derivatives of u and v with respect to x and y and checking that they satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations, we can verify that f is indeed holomorphic.

Know more about holomorphic function here:

https://brainly.com/question/30858417

#SPJ11

Answer:

My brain...

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

i believe its A on plato

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

the scale is 2 so you need to figure out 3y + 5 = 14

The MGF of Y using the fact that Y = μ + oZ where Z ~ N(0, 1) is e^(tμ + t²/2).

The MGF of Y is given by,

E[exp(tY)] = E[exp(t(μ+Z))]

We know that if X is a normal random variable, X~N(μ, σ²) with μ as the mean and σ² as the variance.

The MGF of X is given by,

MGF_X(t) = E[e^(tx)] = e^(μt + (σ²t²)/2)

Here, Y ~ N(μ, 2) we have Y = μ + oZ where Z ~ N(0, 1)

MGF_Y(t) = E[exp(tY)] = E[exp(t(μ+Z))]MGF_

Y(t) = E[e^(tμ+tZ)]MGF_

Y(t) = e^(tμ) E[e^(tZ)]

We know that the MGF of Z is already derived in the lecture 1,

It is MGF_Z(t) = e^(t²/2)MGF_

Y(t) = e^(tμ) e^(t²/2)MGF_

Y(t) = e^(tμ + t²/2)

To know more about variance, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32259787

#SPJ11

Given information is that Y~ N(μ, 2), let's find the MGF of Y using the fact that Y = μ + oZ where Z~ N(0, 1).

The MGF of Y becomes:

MGF of [tex]Y = e^{t} \mu+ MGF\ of\ o \times e^{((t^2)/2)}[/tex]

Hence, the MGF of Y is [tex]e^{t}\mu + MGF\ of\ o \times e^{((t^2)/2)}[/tex].

The MGF of Y is as follows:

MGF of Y = MGF of μ + MGF of oZ

The MGF of Y = MGF of μ + MGF of oMGF of Z

Since the mean of Y is μ, we can substitute the above equation with the following:

[tex]MGF\ of\ Y = e^{t}\mu + MGF\ of\ oMGF\ of\ Z[/tex]

Now let's find the MGF of Z: We know that the MGF of Z is given by;

MGF of [tex]Z = e^{((t^2)/2)}[/tex]

Therefore, the MGF of Y becomes: MGF of [tex]Y = e^{t}\mu + MGF\ of\ o \times e^{((t^2)/2)}[/tex]

Hence, the MGF of Y is [tex]e^{t}\mu + MGF\ of\ o \times e^{((t^2)/2)}[/tex].

To know more about mean visit

https://brainly.com/question/15662511

#SPJ11

Answer:

Length = x + 3 meters

Step-by-step explanation:

Expression for the area of the rectangle = [tex]x^2 - 9 = (x + 3)(x - 3) m[/tex]

Expression for width of rectangle = ([tex]x - 3[/tex]) m

Area of a rectangle = [tex]Length \times Width[/tex]

⇒ Expression for length of rectangle = [tex]\frac{Area}{Width} = \frac{(x + 3)(x - 3)}{(x - 3)} = (x + 3) m[/tex]

Answer:

Marcy paid $4.15

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

Represent hotdogs with x and chips with y.

So, we have:

Jamal

[tex]3x + 2y = 4.85[/tex]

Kenny

[tex]5x + 6y = 9.55[/tex]

See attachment for complete question

Required

Determine the amount for 2x and 3y

From Jamal's and Kenny's orders we have:

[tex]3x + 2y = 4.85[/tex] --- (1)

[tex]5x + 6y = 9.55[/tex] --- (2)

Multiply (1) by 3

[tex]3 * [3x + 2y = 4.85][/tex]

[tex]9x + 6y = 14.55[/tex] --- (3)

Subtract (2) and (3)

[tex]9x - 5x + 6y - 6y = 14.55 - 9.55[/tex]

[tex]9x - 5x = 5[/tex]

[tex]4x = 5[/tex]

Solve for x

[tex]x = \frac{5}{4}[/tex]

[tex]x = 1.25[/tex]

Substitute [tex]x = 1.25[/tex] in [tex]3x + 2y = 4.85[/tex]

[tex]3 * 1.25 + 2y = 4.85[/tex]

[tex]3.75 + 2y = 4.85[/tex]

Solve for y

[tex]y = \frac{4.85 - 3.75}{2}[/tex]

[tex]y = \frac{1.10}{2}[/tex]

[tex]y = 0.55[/tex]

So, the cost of 2x and 3y is:

[tex]Cost = 2x + 3y[/tex]

[tex]Cost = 2*1.25 + 3*0.55[/tex]

[tex]Cost = \$4.15[/tex]

Answer:

1 1/4 cups

Step-by-step explanation:

3 3/4 cups = 3.75

1/3 = .33333

3.75 x .33333 = 1.25

1.25 = 1 1/4 cups

The estimate of the number of gallons of oil in the tank at t = 14 hours is 100.8 gallons. The correct answer is option C.

To estimate the number of gallons of oil in the tank at t = 14 hours using a trapezoidal approximation,

we need to calculate the total change in oil volume over the given time period.

The trapezoidal approximation involves dividing the time interval into subintervals and approximating the change in volume as the sum of trapezoidal areas.

Let's calculate the approximate volume of oil at t = 14 hours using the given data and the trapezoidal approximation: Interval 1 (2 to 5 hours):

Average rate = (R(2) + R(5)) / 2 = (8.2 + 7.8) / 2 = 16 / 2 = 8 gallons per hour.

Volume change =

[tex]Average rate \times time = 8 \times (5 - 2)[/tex]

= 24 gallons.

Interval 2 (5 to 10 hours):

Average rate = (R(5) + R(10)) / 2 = (7.8 + 8.6) / 2 = 16.4 / 2 = 8.2 gallons per hour

Volume change =

[tex]Average rate \times time = 8.2 \times (10 - 5) [/tex]

= 41 gallons

Interval 3 (10 to 14 hours):

Average rate = (R(10) + R(14)) / 2 = (8.6 + 9.3) / 2 = 17.9 / 2 = 8.95 gallons per hour

Volume change =

[tex]Average rate \times time = 8.95 \times (14 - 10)[/tex]

= 35.8 gallons.

Total volume change = Interval 1 + Interval 2 + Interval 3 = 24 + 41 + 35.8 = 100.8 gallons.

Learn more about gallons here:

https://brainly.com/question/1287581

#SPJ4

By reading off the graph as shown in the question, we can see that the time that is required is 20 minutes.

The half life is the time that it taken for only half or 50% of the isotopes that were originally present in the sample to remain. We know that the half life does differ by the kind of sample that is used.

In this case, we want to determine  how long does it take a sample of francium-223 to decay by 50%. This could easily be done from the graph of the decay as shown in the question.

Learn more about half life:https://brainly.com/question/24710827

#SPJ1

Answer:

[tex]y=2x-3[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

This is just algebraic manipulation. In order to solve for y, you need to isolate it. Start this by moving the 2x from the left side of the equation. You can do this by subtracting 2x from both sides and you should end up with:

[tex]-y=-2x+3[/tex]

After this, you still have a negative y, which means you just need to divide both sides of the equation by -1 to get rid of the negative. That should reverse the signs of all the variables in the equation, making it look like:

[tex]y=2x-3[/tex]

Answer:

x = 18

y = 27

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x = 18

y = 27

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

area = 84 in²

Step-by-step explanation:

area = (9x12) - (6x8x0.5) = 84 in²

Answer:

72.25663

Step-by-step explanation:

C=2πr=2·π·11.5≈72.25663

The first three nonzero terms of two linearly independent solutions about x = 0 can be obtained by Taylor expanding the solutions in terms of the exponent r and truncating the series to the desired order.

To determine if x = 0 is a regular singular point of the differential equation xy'' + y = 0, we substitute y = x^r into the equation and solve for the exponent r. Differentiating y twice with respect to x, we have y'' = r(r - 1)x^(r - 2). Substituting these expressions into the differential equation, we get [tex]x(x^r)(r(r - 1)x^(r - 2)) + x^r = 0[/tex]. Simplifying, we obtain r(r - 1) + 1 = 0, which yields r^2 - r + 1 = 0. Solving this quadratic equation, we find that the exponents at the singular point x = 0 are complex and given by r = (1 ± i√3)/2.

To find the first three nonzero terms of two linearly independent solutions about x = 0, we can use the Taylor series expansion. Let's consider the solution y1(x) corresponding to the exponent r = (1 + i√3)/2. Expanding y1(x) as a series around x = 0, we have y1(x) =[tex]x^r = x^((1 +[/tex]i√3)/2) = x^(1/2) *[tex]x^(i√3/2[/tex]). Using the binomial series expansion and Euler's formula, we can write [tex]x^(1/2) and x^(i√3/2)[/tex] as infinite series.

Learn more about binomial series here:

https://brainly.com/question/29592813

#SPJ11

The equation of the median PM in triangle PQR with vertices P(2, 3), Q(-3, 7), and R(-1, -3) is y = (1/3)x + 7/3.

To find the midpoint of QR, we calculate the average of the x-coordinates and the average of the y-coordinates. The x-coordinate of point M is (-3 + (-1))/2 = -2/2 = -1, and the y-coordinate of point M is (7 + (-3))/2 = 4/2 = 2.

Therefore, the coordinates of point M are (-1, 2). Now, we have two points, P (2, 3) and M (-1, 2), and we can find the equation of the line passing through these points using the point-slope form.

The slope of the line passing through P and M is (2 - 3)/(-1 - 2) = -1/-3 = 1/3. Using the point-slope form, we have:

y - 3 = (1/3)(x - 2)

Expanding and rearranging the equation, we get:

y = (1/3)x + 7/3

Therefore, the equation of the median PM in triangle PQR is y = (1/3)x + 7/3.

To learn more about the Point-slope form, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/26704343

#SPJ11

The proof shows that if we assume the premises are true and the conclusion is false, it leads to a contradiction. Therefore, the argument is valid. The modus ponens and conjunction are used.

To construct a proof for the given argument, we'll use a proof by contradiction. We'll assume the premises are true and the conclusion is false, then we'll derive a contradiction. If a contradiction is reached, it means the original assumption was false, and thus the argument is valid.

Argument:

H ⊃ I

J ⊃ K

~K

H ∨ J

Conclusion: I

Proof by contradiction:

H ⊃ I (Premise)

J ⊃ K (Premise)

~K (Premise)

H ∨ J (Premise)

~I (Assumption for proof by contradiction)

H (Disjunction elimination from 4)

I (Modus ponens using 1 and 6)

~J (Assumption for proof by contradiction)

K (Modus ponens using 2 and 8)

~K ∧ K (Conjunction introduction of 3 and 9)

Contradiction: ~I ∧ I (Conjunction introduction of 5 and 7)

Conclusion: I (Proof by contradiction)

The proof shows that if we assume the premises are true and the conclusion is false, it leads to a contradiction. Therefore, the argument is valid.

To know more about Conjunction:

https://brainly.com/question/23393962

#SPJ4

If 19,000=19% Then 100,000=100%

100,000-900=99,100

Answer: $99,100 was his salary last year

Answer:

35.6 feets

Step-by-step explanation:

To obtain tree height :

(Height of stick / shadow of stick = height of tree / shadow of tree)

Height of stick = 2 feets

Shadow of stick = 0.8 feets

Shadow of tree = 14.24 feets

Height of tree = h

(2 / 0.8 = h /14.24)

Cross multiply

0.8h = 14.24 * 2

0.8h = 28.48

h = 28.48 / 0.8

h = 35.6 feets

The value of [v]B1 is [[1][0]][[0][0]]

Suppose [v]B2 is as follows:

[v]B2 = [[11][14]]

[13][14]]

[7][6]]

[10]]

If the ordered bases are B1 = {a, b} and B2 = {c, d}, we want to find [v]B1.

To find [v]B1, we need to express the columns of [v]B2 in terms of the basis vectors of B1.

The first column of [v]B2 is [11, 13, 7, 10]. We want to express this column in terms of the basis vectors of B1: [a, b].

To do this, we set up the following equation:

[11][13][7][10] = [a][b]

Solving this equation, we find that:

11a + 13b = 11

13a + 14b = 13

7a + 6b = 7

10a = 10

From the last equation, we can see that a = 1.

Substituting this value of a into the first three equations, we can solve for b:

11 + 13b = 11

13 + 14b = 13

7 + 6b = 7

Simplifying these equations, we find that b = 0.

Therefore, [v]B1 is as follows:

[v]B1 = [[1][0]]

[0][0]]

To know more about value refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30145972

#SPJ11

a) The correlation coefficient (r) is approximately 0.300, indicating a weak positive linear relationship between the ages of Best Actresses and Best Actors.

b) Based on the correlation coefficient (r), there is a weak positive linear correlation between the ages of Best Actresses and Best Actors, suggesting that as the ages of Best Actresses increase, the ages of Best Actors also tend to increase, but the relationship is not very strong.

To find the correlation coefficient (r), we can use the given ages of Best Actresses and Best Actors. The correlation coefficient measures the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables. Using a calculator or statistical software, we calculate the correlation coefficient to be approximately 0.300.

Based on the correlation coefficient (r) of approximately 0.300, there is a weak positive linear correlation between the ages of Best Actresses and Best Actors. This means that there is a tendency for the ages of Best Actresses and Best Actors to increase together, but the relationship is not very strong. The correlation coefficient ranges from -1 to +1, where 0 indicates no linear correlation, 1 indicates a strong positive linear correlation, and -1 indicates a strong negative linear correlation. In this case, the value of 0.300 suggests a weak positive linear relationship, indicating that as the ages of Best Actresses increase, the ages of Best Actors also tend to increase, albeit not strongly.

Learn more about Correlation

brainly.com/question/28898177

#SPJ11

Answer:

Hi! The answer to your question is D. {(0,0),(0,1),(1,2)(1,3)}

Step-by-step explanation:

☆*: .｡..｡.:*☆☆*: .｡..｡.:*☆☆*: .｡..｡.:*☆☆*: .｡..｡.:*☆

☁Brainliest is greatly appreciated!☁

Hope this helps!!

- Brooklynn Deka

Answer: C.

Step-by-step explanation: To find the volume of something, you multiply the length, width, and height together. Since they have already multiplied the length and width together to form the base, multiply 7 by 12 (base times height) to get 84 cubic inches.

The complex number Z = (20 + 120i) can be expressed in polar form as Z = 2√370(cos(1.405) + isin(1.405)).

To express the complex number Z = (20 + 120i) in polar form, we need to find its magnitude (r) and argument (θ).

The magnitude of a complex number Z = a + bi is given by the formula:

|r| = √(a^2 + b^2)

In this case, a = 20 and b = 120.

Therefore, the magnitude of Z is:

|r| = √(20^2 + 120^2) = √(400 + 14400) = √14800 = 2√370.

The argument (θ) of a complex number Z = a + bi is given by the formula:

θ = arctan(b/a)

In this case, a = 20 and b = 120. Therefore, the argument of Z is:

θ = arctan(120/20) = arctan(6) ≈ 1.405 radians.

Now we can express Z in polar form as Z = r(cosθ + isinθ), where r is the magnitude and θ is the argument:

Z = 2√370(cos(1.405) + isin(1.405)).

To know more about polar form refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/11741181#

#SPJ11

Answer:

9

plz mark as brainliest

Answer:

9

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\sqrt{81} =9[/tex]

9 x 9 = 81

To determine whether the function f(z) = 1/(z^2 + 1) has an antiderivative on a given domain, we need to check if the function is analytic on that domain.

(a) For the domain G = C\{i, -i}, the function f(z) = 1/(z^2 + 1) is analytic on G. This is because it is a rational function and does not have any singularities (poles) within the domain. Hence, it has an antiderivative on G.

(b) For the domain G = {z Re(z) > 0}, the function f(z) = 1/(z^2 + 1) does not have an antiderivative on G. This is because the function has singularities at z = i and z = -i, which lie on the imaginary axis. Since the domain excludes these points, f(z) is not analytic on G and does not have an antiderivative on G.In summary, the function f(z) = 1/(z^2 + 1) has an antiderivative on the domain G = C\{i, -i} but does not have an antiderivative on the domain G = {z Re(z) > 0}.

Learn more about antiderivatives here: brainly.com/question/30764807

#SPJ11