13 Points! Please help ASAP^^
Please match the word to the correct definition.

Question 1 options:

is a person that is accused of committing a crime or a person against whom some type of civil relief is being sought in a civil case.


legal reasons, stated in court session, in written and/ or verbal form, based on statutes, regulations, case precedents, and reasoning applied to the facts of the particular situation.


means to be in accordance with the rules, laws, and rights presented in a governing document called a constitution


the official power (of a court) to be able to hear cases and make legal decisions and judgements


The highest ranking or senior member of the court, they preside over the court in its public sessions when the court is hearing arguments of a case and during its private conferences when discussing and deciding cases.


the person who is accusing another person, or a group of some wrongdoing and is bring the suit to court.


the highest judicial court in a state or a country. Is the highest court in the US


comes from the Latin word for city, because in earlier history people identified themselves as belong to cities. It is a legal status that gives you a right to live, work, pay taxes, and vote


anything that a person (or a business) has legal title over. They can be tangible or intangible and ownership give the owner enforceable rights


means to be in violation of one or more of the rules, laws, and/ or rights presented in a governing document called a constitution


a conclusion reached after an evaluation of the facts and the precedent, and law. It is also called a ruling, an opinion, or a judgement.

1.
Property

2.
Citizenship

3.
Supreme Court

4.
Jurisdiction

5.
Plaintiff

6.
Defendant

7.
Chief Justice

8.
Arguments

9.
Decision

10.
Constitutional

11.
Unconstitutional

Answer:

Appellate brief

An appellate brief is a written legal argument presented to an appellate court. Its purpose is to persuade the higher court to uphold or reverse the trial court’s decision. Briefs of this kind are therefore geared to presenting the issues involved in the case from the perspective of one side only.

Appellate briefs from both sides can be very valuable to anyone assessing the legal issues raised in a case. Unfortunately, they are rarely published. The U.S. Supreme Court is the only court for which briefs are regularly available in published form. The Landmark Briefs series (REF. LAW KF 101.9 .K8) includes the full texts of briefs relating to a very few of the many cases heard by this court. In addition, summaries of the briefs filed on behalf of the plaintiff or defendant for all cases reported are included in the U.S. Supreme Court Reports. Lawyer’s Ed., 2nd. series (REF. LAW KF 101 .A42).

Student brief

A student brief is a short summary and analysis of the case prepared for use in classroom discussion. It is a set of notes, presented in a systematic way, in order to sort out the parties, identify the issues, ascertain what was decided, and analyze the reasoning behind decisions made by the courts.

Although student briefs always include the same items of information, the form in which these items are set out can vary. Before committing yourself to a particular form for briefing cases, check with your instructor to ensure that the form you have chosen is acceptable.

The parties and how to keep track of them

Beginning students often have difficulty identifying relationships between the parties involved in court cases. The following definitions may help:

Plaintiffs sue defendants in civil suits in trial courts.

The government (state or federal) prosecutes defendants in criminal cases in trial courts.

The losing party in a criminal prosecution or a civil action may ask a higher (appellate) court to review the case on the ground that the trial court judge made a mistake. If the law gives the loser the right to a higher court review, his or her lawyers will appeal. If the loser does not have this right, his or her lawyers may ask the court for a writ of certiorari. Under this procedure, the appellate court is being asked to exercise its lawful discretion in granting the cases a hearing for review.

For example, a defendant convicted in a federal district court has the right to appeal this decision in the Court of Appeals of the circuit and this court cannot refuse to hear it. The party losing in this appellate court can request that the case be reviewed by the Supreme Court, but, unless certain special circumstances apply, has no right to a hearing.

These two procedures, appeals and petitions for certiorari, are sometimes loosely grouped together as “appeals.” However, there is, as shown, a difference between them, and you should know it.

A person who seeks a writ of certiorari, that is, a ruling by a higher court that it hear the case, is known as a petitioner. The person who must respond to the petition, that is, the winner in the lower court, is called the respondent.

A person who files a formal appeal demanding appellate review as a matter of right is known as the appellant. His or her opponent is the appellee.

The name of the party initiating the action in court, at any level on the judicial ladder, always appears first in the legal papers. For example, Arlo Tatum and others sued in Federal District Court for an injunction against Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird and others to stop the Army from spying on them. Tatum and his friends became plaintiffs and the case was then known as Tatum v. Laird. The Tatum group lost in the District Court and appealed to the Court of Appeals, where they were referred to as the appellants, and the defendants became the appellees. Thus the case was still known at Tatum v. Laird.

When Tatum and his fellow appellants won in the Court of Appeals, Laird and his fellow appellees decided to seek review by the Supreme Court. They successfully petitioned for a writ of certiorari from the Supreme Court directing the Court of Appeals to send up the record of the case (trial court transcript, motion papers, and assorted legal documents) to the Supreme Court.

At this point the name of the case changed to Laird v. Tatum: Laird and associates were now the petitioners, and Tatum and his fellows were the respondents. Several church groups and a group of former intelligence agents obtained permission to file briefs (written arguments) on behalf of the respondents to help persuade the Court to arrive at a decision favorable to them. Each of these groups was termed an amicus curiae, or “friend of the court.”

In criminal cases, switches in the titles of cases are common, because most reach the appellate courts as a result of an appeal by a convicted defendant. Thus, the case ofArizona v. Miranda later became Miranda v. Arizona.

Student briefs

Explanation:

Dan is responsible for maintaining various cryptographical algorithms related to communication. Which government department is likely to fund his agency? A. DOE B. DHS C. DoD D. NASA

Why was Nelson Mandela such an inspiration for black people in South Africa ?

Which was not a result of the industrial revolution?

American History Section 1BC / Module 8.
2. What made the Tehran Conference so difficult?
A. Stalin had completely different war aims than FDR or Churchill.
B. Churchill dropped out, angry at the fighting between the other two.
C. Each of the three leaders had his own goals that conflicted with the others'.
D. FDR was so tired out by the trip that he could not lead well.

A group of Washington residents has gathered petition signatures for a charter to establish a new city. What steps do
they need to take next?
A. They must decide on a form of government and describe the boundaries.
B. They must state the name of the city and get it approved in an election.
C. They must get the petition approved in an election and by the legislature.
D. They must describe the boundaries and give people a chance to opt out.

The answer is not letter B

What was the initial results of the presidential election in 2000?

Which event caused an American declaration of war against Spain?

What was the largest Contiguous empire in history? ​

1.) What was the Kansas-Nebraska Act? Write one or two sentences.



2.) How did the north feel about it? (POV) Write one or two sentences.



3.) How did the south feel about it? (POV) Write one or two sentences.



4. ) Who wrote the bill?



5.) Why was this such an important law ? Write one or two sentences

Which section of the nation was economically dominated after the civil war?

Describe Sam Houston’s role in the events leading to Texas secession.

I need help with 7 and 8 please help

What was one cause of the War of 1812?
O A. Britain did not recognize the United States as a country.
B. Britain and Germany attacked the United States.
O C. Britain tried to limit American trade with France.
O D. Britain supported Napoleon Bonaparte, France's leader.
SUBMIT

Which two of the following statements are correct?
Some restrictions may be placed on Americans’ constitutional rights.
All the amendments to the Constitution are collectively known as the Bill of Rights.
Americans have the right to say or write anything they want.
The Constitution protects individual rights through the Bill of Rights.

can anyone help me please with that



In this short essay explain and discuss European Motives for Exploration in the Age of Discovery. ??​

Drag each label to the correct location on the chart.
Complete the chart by identifying the characteristics of the First Amendment and journalism standards.

What is significant about Promontory Summit, Utah?

It is the beginning of the South Pass through the Rocky Mountains.

It is the end of the Transcontinental Railroad in the west.

It is where President Washington made his last speech.

It is where the last spike was driven to complete the Transcontinental Railroad.

How did reconstruction change in the 20th century?

What percentage of people coming to America were women?

what factors led to the outbreak of World War II​

Civil rights grew over time, with integration happening in stages. Which event stemmed from rights granted in 1941 and paved the vay for school desegregation in 1954? Truman desegregates the United States Armed Forces. B) Truman abolished segregation in restaurants and movie theaters. Truman granted voting rights to black men eighteen years of age or older. D) Truman ended discrimination on buses, trains, and all public transportation. Activate Windows​

Rivers and mountains are examples of __________ boundaries.

Why do you think support for independence took some time to gain momentum?



I'll give you brainlest

What were two parts of early colony government

Who were the Boxers and what did they want?
Answer:​

answer if you want or need points

Which statement about venue shopping is true?

Who is the leader of the House of Representatives?

Which action by the US in the early 1960s deepened conflict in Vietnam?

restoring the former emperor to power
ignoring the concept of domino theory
supplying military advisers and weapons
not intervening after the assassination of the president