Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
You did not give the table but here are some differences between a developed nation and a developing nation.
First and foremost, we should note that a developed country is one that is highly industrialized, has a high GDP and has a high per capital income while a developing nation is one that has low industrialization, low GDP and low per capita income.
Secondly, a developed nation typically has a low unemployment rate while a developing nation has a high unemployment rate.
Thirdly, a developed nation has a low birth rate and a low infant mortality rate while a developing nation has a high birth rate and a high infant mortality rate.
Furthermore, a developed nation has a high standard of living and good infrastructural facilities such as good road network, constant power supply etc while a developing nation has a low standard of living and poor infrastructural facilities.
Lastly, the resources of a developed nation are effectively and efficiently used while a developing nation mismanages its resources.
1.
Using an amount of force that is beyond that which is reasonably necessary?
Answer:
Reasonable Force The amount of force necessary to protect oneself or one's property. Reasonable force is a term associated with defending one's person or property from a violent attack, theft, or other type of unlawful aggression. It may be used as a defense in a criminal trial or to defend oneself in a suit alleging tortious conduct.
What is a major disadvantage to the adversarial system? The judge delays court dates, so there is much expense in holding offenders in jail. There are always more than two sides to a trial. The lawyers have too great a time burden placed on them. Attorneys are often unequal in skills and expense.
Answer:
The right approach is Option B. A further explanation is given below.
Explanation:
Throughout the adversarial system, these are some of the drawbacks of attorneys are that it should be built on 2 different accurately evaluate. The prosecutor and perhaps the prosecutor, whom individual or group this same defendant as well as the complainant, regarding facts provided by both parties whether individuals consider having been important to everyone's particular instance. Perhaps this could even be claimed that seeing who could outmaneuver their rival instead of simply finding the facts appears something of a match.All the other three solutions aren't connected to the situation in question. But the option above is accurate.
Answer:
Attorneys are often unequal in skills and expense
Explanation:
I put the other answer and got it wrong on edg.
What is toxicology?
Toxicology is the study of the negative effects of
blank on living thing
Answer:
foreign fluids
Explanation:
coroners run a toxicology report when someone passes away to find any kind of drugs, alcohol or poisons in someone's system
Toxicology is the study of foreign fluids and not the study of the negative effects of blank on living things.
What is Toxicology?Toxicology is that branch of science that also helps in the understanding of the same. The most important thing is that Toxicology is that it talks about the harmful effects of the chemicals that are prevalent in society from time immemorial.
Toxicology thus talks about the various means and also the understandings based on the amount of poison that particular thing has got within itself. the other most important thing is that it has also talked about the understanding of the amount of harmfulness of the substance, particularly on some other substances.
Toxicology is thus defined by the amount of toxic or poison that is being generated.
Learn more about Toxicology here:
https://brainly.com/question/5020436
#SPJ2
What potential conflict of interest is presented by a lawmaker accepting an
honorarium from an organization?
A. It could make the organization more likely to agree with the
lawmaker's opinions.
B. It could cause people to protest against the organization.
C. It could cause the lawmaker to join the organization as a private
citizen.
D. It could influence the lawmaker's view of the organization when
voting on new laws.
Answer:
A term used to describe the situation in which a public official or fiduciary who, contrary to the obligation and absolute duty to act for the benefit of the public or a designated individual, exploits the relationship for personal benefit, typically pecuniary.
In certain relationships, individuals or the general public place their trust and confidence in someone to act in their best interests. When an individual has the responsibility to represent another person—whether as administrator, attorney, executor, government official, or trustee—a clash between professional obligations and personal interests arises if the individual tries to perform that duty while at the same time trying to achieve personal gain. The appearance of a conflict of interest is present if there is a potential for the personal interests of an individual to clash with fiduciary duties, such as when a client has his or her attorney commence an action against a company in which the attorney is the majority stockholder.
Incompatibility of professional duties and personal interests has led Congress and many state legislatures to enact statutes defining conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest and specifying the sanctions for violations. A member of a profession who has been involved in a conflict of interest might be subject to disciplinary proceedings before the body that granted permission to practice that profession.
Answer:
D. It could influence the lawmaker's view of the organization when voting on new laws
The purpose of the state of union address is to provide the opportunity for the
Answer:
The purpose of the State of the Union address is to provide the opportunity for the "President to address Congress and the nation about the legislative goals to be accomplished," since this is one of the few times that the President has the attention of the entire Congress.
Explanation: